Connaissances Et Motivations Des Medecins Dans La Prescription Des Examens D’imagerie Devant Une Urgence Abdominale Non Traumatique Au Togo: A Propos D’une Enquete Realisee Aupres Des Medecins

  • A. Amadou Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Campus.
  • KA. Agbangba Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Campus.
  • G. Watara Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Campus.
  • L. Sonhaye Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Campus.
  • B. Tchangaï Service de Chirurgie Générale du CHU Sylvanus Olympio.
  • M. Tchaou Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Sylvanus Olympio
  • V. Adjenou Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Campus.
  • K. N’dakena Service de Radiologie et Imagerie du CHU Campus.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate physicians' knowledge of prescribing imaging modalities in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Materials and method: A transversal and analytical study, consisting of the filling of a questionnaire distributed to general physicians. The survey card included, among others, the first-line imaging modality and the most effective on four abdominal emergencies found in Togo. Results: Regarding acute appendicitis, 73% of physicians estimated the imaging needed. For 92%, ultrasound was the firstline imaging technique because of its availability according to 40%. For 87%, the scan was the most effective exam. In peritonitis, 69% of physicians considered imaging important. For 98% Conventional Chest and Abdominal Radiography was the first-line examination because 52% of physicians said it was the most available. 89% thought the CT scan was the most effective. In the case of bowel obstruction, 89% of physicians found the necessary imaging. For 96%, the first-line examination was the Conventional Chest and Abdominal Radiography because of its availability according to 51% of doctors. All physicians felt that the CT scan was the most effective examination. Concerning acute cholecystitis, 95% considered imaging very important. For 95%, ultrasound was the first-line examination. Its prescription was motivated by its availability according to 50% of doctors. 96% felt that CT was the most effective examination. Conclusion: From our study, it appears that in abdominal emergencies, imaging examinations necessary for diagnosis are prescribed according to their availability and cost, not according to their effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Published
2017-02-28
How to Cite
Amadou, A., Agbangba, K., Watara, G., Sonhaye, L., Tchangaï, B., Tchaou, M., Adjenou, V., & N’dakena, K. (2017). Connaissances Et Motivations Des Medecins Dans La Prescription Des Examens D’imagerie Devant Une Urgence Abdominale Non Traumatique Au Togo: A Propos D’une Enquete Realisee Aupres Des Medecins. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(6), 480. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n6p480