Perpetuating Evidence in Civil Law Proceedings

Zurab Morchadze

doi:10.19044/esj.2022.v18n5p109

Zurab Morchadze Grigol Robakidze University, Batumi, Georgia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n5p109

Keywords: Perpetuating, evidence, case, lost, lawsuit, decision

Abstract

The civil law process is based on the principles of adversarial proceedings and disposition, and having complete information on these principles is crucial for the parties to the process. For example, even in an apparently "profitable" case, a party who did not take care of applying the perpetuating measures may not win anything, because at the time of enforcement of the ruling it may appear that the defendant has long since alienated her/his property, or if the party has not taken care of the request for evidence and the perpetuation of evidence in a timely manner, serious difficulties may arise in the consideration of the case and as a result, lose the case. Evidence is facts obtained from sources provided by law on the basis of which the parties defend their interests. The burden of proof at trial is shared equally between the parties. The parties try to prove their veracity in order to get the appropriate result. Therefore, the main purpose of the article is to focus on the importance of the perpetuation of evidence. The first chapter deals with the essence perpetuating evidence, the second chapter deals with the judge's ruling according to which s/he can load the evidence with obligation even before the lawsuit is filed, the third chapter is devoted to the evaluation of evidence by the court and the judge's inner conviction. The fourth chapter deals with the rule of appeal, which is one of the problematic issues of this paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Arkhoshashvili L., Perpetuating the evidence in accordance with civil procedure law, University of Grigol Robakidze, file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/147-Article%20Text-418-1-10-20130705.pdf 17.02.2021.
2. Arkhoshashvili L., Problematic issues existing in practice relating to the defendant's procedural means of protection against the claim, Tbilisi, University of Grigol Robakidze, 2016; (4).
3. Basilaia P., #1(24)10 Results of not filling the response (objection), Justice and Law #1(24); (17).
4. Boeling H., Chanturia L., Judicia decision – making methodology on the Georgian cases, 2019.
5. Civil procedure code of Belarus, 1998;
6. Civil Procedure of Foreign Countries, edited by Davtyan A. G. M., 2008;(26).
7. Civil procedure code of Uzbekistan Repulic, 1995.
8. Civil Procedure in Cross-Cultural Dialogue: Eurasia Context, Conference Book, Edited by Dmitry Maleshin, Moscow 2012, 352, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2280682;(352).
9. Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia - Case - ას-258-516-08 2008;
10. Eberrhard schilken-ivilprozessreccht, 2010; (229).
11. Gagua I., The burden of proof in Georgian civil procedural law, Tbilisi, 2013; (22).
12. Herman T., Evidence law, Tbilisi, 2016.
13. Ignatenko V.V., Estimated concepts in the legislation on administrative responsibility. Dis. . . cand. legal Sciences. Sverdlovsk,1989;(344).
14. Kazhashvili G., The role of the perpetuate the evidence and the role of the guarantee of the perpetuate in the proceedings, 2016 (77,78,81).
15. Kazhashvili G., Procedural perpetuating as a precondition for making an enforceable decision, Dissertaion, Tbilisi, 2018 (19-20).
16. Kurdadze Sh., - Performance of process peculiarities in civil law, Collection of scientific papers, Tbilisi, 2012.
17. Kurdadze Sh., Khunashvili N., Civil procedure law of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2012;(238,239).
18. Law of Georgia, Civil procedure code, Consolidated version, https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/29962?publication=144, 17/02/2021.
19. LiLuashvili T., Khrustali V., Commentary on the code of civil procedure, Second revised edition, Tbilisi, 2007; (224).
20. Liluashvili T., Liluashvili G., Khrustali V., Dzlierishvili Z., Civil procedure law, Tbilisi, 2014;(94,229,230).
21. Recommendations on civil, administrative and criminal matters developed as a result of regular meetings of judges in the Supreme Court of Georgia. Uniform practice of the Supreme Court of Georgia relating the civil and administrative cases, publication of the Supreme Court of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2006.
22. Spencer A.B., The Preservation Obligation: Regulating and Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation in Federal Court, 79 Fordham L. Rev. 2005 (2011), 2009, http://ir.lawnet.fordham. edu/fl r/vol79/iss5/7.
23. Todria T., Dissertation, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Significance of the factual circumstances in the Court of Cassation, Tbilisi University Press, 2010;(16).
24. Treushnikov M.K., Judicial evidence, M.,1999;(161).
25. Treushnikov M.K., prof., doctor of juridical sciences – Chrestomathy on civil procedure / moscow – 1996;(94).
26. Yudelson K.S., Problems of proof in Sov. Civil process, M,1951;(115).