Participatory Project Monitoring and Evaluation and Performance of Mango Farming Projects in Makueni County, Kenya
Abstract
This paper focuses on showing the necessity of crafting a feasible project monitoring and evaluation policy which would be an indispensable appraisal tool for assessing the performance of mango projects. It is extracted from the PhD thesis, which aimed to establish the influence of participatory monitoring and evaluation of mango farming projects in Makueni County, Kenya. A pragmatic research paradigm, a descriptive study plan, and a multistage sampling technique were used in the study. A sample of 375 respondents using the Krejcie and Morgan tabulation formula was selected from a population of 12,622 mango farmers. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used as tools for quantitative data analysis, while the content analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. The null hypothesis that there was no significant relationship between the participatory monitoring and evaluation of the project and the performance of the mango farming projects was tested using the correlation and the F-test. The results presented a statistically significant correlation at 95% confidence level with DF (2,367) F=4.756, t=2.269 at level of significance, P=0.000<0.05, r=0.0879 and R square=0.0773. The null hypothesis was therefore rejected, illustrating a significant relationship between the participatory project M&E and the performance of the Mango projects. Based on the results, the study identified a pressing need to use participatory project monitoring and evaluation to address performance issues across the mango value chain. Partnership Support between national and county governments was necessary to engage key experts in the field of agricultural extension, in order to engage mango farmers in improving mango performance.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation in Sherry R. "A Ladder of Citizen Participation," Journal of the American Institute of Planners (JAIP), Vol. 35, No. 4, July 1969, pp. 216-22.
3. Antwi, M.A. & Oladele, O.I. (2013). Determinants of Performance of Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) Projects in the Ngaka Modiri Molema District, South Africa, Journal of Human Ecology, 42:2, 155-162, DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2013.11906589.
4. Baita, H.U., Manga, A.A., & Mustapha, Y. (2010). Evaluation of Different Morphotypes of Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) For Use as Rootstock in Seedlings Production. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 79–82, Bajopas Volume 3 Number 1 June 2010.
5. Bonan, J., Pareglio, S., & Rotondi, V. (2015). The Role Of Impact Evaluation Of Agricultural Development Projects Author (S):, Source: Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, Anno 123, No. 4 (Ottobre-Dicembre 2015), pp. 369-380 Published by: Vita e Pensiero – Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26151496.
6. Brecht, J.K., Mitcham, E., Sargent, S. & Kader, A. (2009). Monitoring and Evaluation of the Mango Supply Chain to Improve Mango Quality: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, July 2009.
7. Chinn & Kramer (1999). Theoretical Framework vs. Conceptual Framework, StudyMode.com, http://www.studymode.com/essays/Theoritical-Framework-Vs-Conceptual-Framework-825118.html.
8. Crawford, P. & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the aid project implementation Institute for Sustainable Futures, Received 22 May 2001; received in revised form 12 October 2001; accepted 4 October 2002. International Journal of Project Management 21 (2003) 363–373.
9. Dubin Simon (1976). https://books. Google.co.ke/books? Id=JUKTMx8ZeKsC&pg=PA9&dq =meaning+of+theoretical+and+conceptual+framework+by+Dublin+in+1976&source.
10. FAO (2017). Increasing the Yield of Mango with Selective Harvest, Food and Agriculture of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/3/CA2574EN/ca2574en.pdf.
11. Farmbizafrica (2018). Mango juice factory to benefit 12,000 Makueni mango farmers. http://farmbizafrica.com/markets/2010-mango-juice-factory-to-benefit-12-000-makueni-farmers.
12. Freshplaza (2019). Kenya: Enhance value addition mango farming. https://www.freshplaza.com/article/9066388/kenya-enhance-value-addition-mango-farming/
13. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
http://www.scirp.org/vtj3fa45qm1ean45vvffcz55)/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1209107
14. Fisher, R.A. (1935). The design of experiments. Oliver & Boyd, London, UK. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1939-04964-000.
15. Gakuu, C.M., Kidombo, H.J., & Keiyoro, P.N. (2018). Fundamentals Research Methods: Concepts, Practice and Applications.
16. Goldratt, E.M. (1990). What is this Thing Called Theory of Constraints (1990) ISBN 0-88427-166-8.
17. Golini, R., Corti, B., & Landoni, P. (2017). More efficient project execution and evaluation with logical framework and project cycle management: evidence from international development projects, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35:2, 128-138, DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1239495.
18. Grieshbach, J. (2011). Mango growing in Kenya. ISRAF, Nairobi, Kenya.
19. Hughes, F.M.R., Adams, W.M., Butchart, S.H.M., Field, R.H., Kelvin, S.H., & Warrington, S. (2016). The challenges of integrating biodiversity and ecosystem services Monitoring and Evaluation at a landscape-scale wetland restoration project in the UK, Source: Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Sep 2016) Published by: Resilience Alliance Inc. Stable URL:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269982.
20. Ihesiene, U.C. (2014). A Survey-Based Study of Project Management Problems in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 10(25). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n25p%p.
21. Jisheng, Y. (2013). "Tombstone: The Great Chinese Famine, 1958–1962". Book Review. New York Times. Dec, 2012. 3 March 2013. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/books/review/tombstone-the-great-chinese-famine-1958-1962-by-yang-jisheng.html.
22. Kevin, Z.C., Claire, H., & Fan, S., (2014). "Steadying the ladder: China's agricultural and rural development engagement in Africa", China Agricultural Economic Review, Vol. 6 Issue: 1, pp.2-20, https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-04-2013-0055.
23. KNBS (2019). https://knoema.com/atlas/sources/KNBS.
24. Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610, https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.
25. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago Uni. Chicago Press.
26. Kyalo, D.N., Mulwa, A.S. & Nyonje, R.O. (2015). Monitoring and Evaluation of Projects and Programmes: A Hand Book for Students and Practitioners. Nairobi: Aura Books-ISBN 9966- 035-13-4; 2nd Ed. 2015.
27. Lauricella, M., Emanuele, S., Calvaruso, G., Giuliano, M., & D’Anneo, A. (2017). Multifaceted Health Benefits of Mangifera indica L. (Mango): The Inestimable Value of Orchards Recently Planted in Sicilian Rural Areas, Nutrients. 2017 May; 9(5): 525. Published online 2017 May 20. Doi: 10.3390/nu9050525, PMCID: PMC5452255.
28. Lorenzo-Santiago, M.A., Juárez-López, A.L., Rosas-Acevedo, J.L., Rendón-Villalobos, J.R., Toribio-Jiménez, J. & García-Hernández, E. (2018). Management and Final Disposal of Mango Waste in the State of Guerrero, Mexico: A Brief Review Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 10, No. 12; 2018 ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760, Published by Canadian Centre of Science and Education.
29. Maddaloni, D.F. & Davis, K. (2017). Project manager's perception of the local communities' stakeholder in megaprojects: an empirical investigation in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, ISSN (print) 0263-7863 (Epub Ahead of Print).
30. Malley, Z.J., Hart, A., Buck, L., Mwambene, P.L., Katambara, Z., Mng’ong’o, M., & Chambi, C. (2017). Integrated agricultural landscape management: Case study of inclusive innovation processes, monitoring and evaluation in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania, Outlook on Agriculture 2017, SAGE: Vol. 46(2) 146–153 ª The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0030727017709393 journals.sagepub.com/home/oag.
31. Mele, P.V., Nguyen, T.T.C. & Huis, A.V. (2001). Farmers' knowledge, perceptions and practices in mango pest management in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, International Journal of Pest Management, 47:1, 7-16, DOI: 10.1080/09670870150215559, 2001, 47(1) 7± 16, ISSN0967-0874print/ISSN1366-5863online.
32. Muhammad, W., Iqbal, N., Saeed, S., Javed, M. & Khalid, K.M. (2013). Monitoring and Varietal Preference of Mango Midge, Procontarinia mangicola (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 45(5), pp. 1273-1278, 2013.
33. Muthini, D.W. (2015). Thesis by Davis Nguthi Muthini on Assessment of Mango Farmers’ Choice of Marketing Channels in Makueni, Kenya. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
34. Murei, L. C., Kidombo, H., & Gakuu, C. (2018). Influence Of Monitoring and Evaluation Human Resources Capacity on Performance of Horticulture Projects In Nakuru County, Kenya. IJRDO-Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research ISSN: 2456-2971.
35. Nankinga, C.M., Isabirye, B.E., Muyinza, H., Rwomushana, I., Stevenson, P.C., Mayamba, A., Aool, W. & Akol, A.M. (2014). Fruit fly infestation in mango: A threat to the Horticultural sector in Uganda. National Agricultural Research Organization, Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 15 (1): 1-14 ISSN 1026-0919.
36. PMI’s PMBOK (1996). Project Management Institute’s, Project Management Book of Knowledge.
37. Purushottam, B. (2015). Challenges facing mango cultivators of India and the feasible solutions. International Journal of Management and Development Studies 4(3): 250-255 (2015)
ISSN (Online): 2320-0685. ISSN (Print): 2321-1423.
38. Shava, E. & Thakhathi, D.R. (2016). Elvin Shava & Dovhani Reckson Thakhathi (2016) Challenges in the Implementation of Community Development Projects in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, Journal of Human Ecology, 56:3, 363-373, DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2016.11907073 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2016.11907073.
39. Siddique, K., Ahad, M.Z., & Din, W.U. (2019). Management and Evaluation of Communication and Coordination Practices among Multi Stakeholders in Complex Engineering Projects in Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 15(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n3p354.
40. Simiyu, N.R., Ngugi, L., & Minja, D. (2018). The Influence of Project Planning and Implementation on the Performance of Agricultural Projects by Community Based Organizations in Bungoma County, Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management; ISSN (Paper) 2222-1905 ISSN (Online) 2222-2839, Vol 10, No 28 (2018), Simiyu https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/44532.
41. Tahir, M. & Naeem, H. (2017). The Impact of Switch Leadership on Project Success: Empirical Evidence from UAE. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(22), 241.
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n22p241.
42. Torraco, R.J. (2004). Theory-Building Research Methods, Torraco R. J., https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AyMZt9AodEEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA351&dq=Torraco+R.+J.+ (2004), +Theory- Building+ Research +Methods. & OT.
43. Usman, M., Soomro, T. R., & Brohi, M. N. (2014). EMBEDDING PROJECT MANAGEMENT INTO XP, SCRUM AND RUP. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 10(15).
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n15p%p.
44. Verschoor, A.J., Rooyen, J.V., & D'Haese, L. (2005). New agricultural development criteria: a proposal for project design and implementation, Development Southern Africa, 22:4, 501-514, DOI: 10.1080/03768350500322677.
45. Warburton, R.D.H. & Cioffi, D.F. (2014). Project management theory: deriving a project's cost and schedule for its network structure, Project Management Institute Research and Education Conference, PA: Project Management Institute.
https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/updating-project-management-theory-1917.
Copyright (c) 2022 Charles Kyale Kisumbi, Angeline Sabina Mulwa, John Mwaura Mbugua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.