Enhancing Primary Schoolchildren’s Autonomy and Interest towards Reading through Inquiry-based Activities and Digital Applications (A Case of Georgian Private School)
Abstract
Over the last century language teaching methods have undergone fundamental changes. A different set of approaches has appeared in response to the ineffectiveness of traditional teaching methods. As traditional approaches are not designed to pursue students’ interests and do not encourage them to cooperate in self-directed learning, there is an urgent need to develop more effective teaching and learning approaches for 21st-century learners. Nowadays, teacher-centered education gives the way to more student-centered approaches, where the main goal of learning is to nourish interest in students and give them an opportunity to inquire and master learning in a more meaningful way. As technology-assisted education has become an indispensable and challenging part of student-centered education, it has become absolutely vital for teachers to enhance the integration of technology into their classrooms. Inquiry-based English language teaching through digital applications is among the most contemporary teaching approaches, which perfectly corresponds to the 21st-century demands while enhancing autonomy and fostering students’ reading interest. Considering the urgency of integrating contemporary teaching methods in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) class, the objective of the presented study has been shaped to outline the impact of inquiry-based English language teaching through digital applications on primary learners’ autonomy and interest development in one of the Georgian private schools. A quantitative method was applied to the present study in order to compare pre and post-experimental questionnaire results and measure primary schoolchildren’s autonomy level, curiosity, and interest in reading through digital applications before and after the experiment. The learning processes of the experimental and control groups were compared. The obtained data has been analyzed using SPSS to compare the survey results. The quantitative study has revealed that the 21st-century generation positively responds to contemporary teaching methods and inquiry-based teaching through digital applications has proved to be effective. Based on the research findings, eBooks and digital applications are reasonable resources to be utilized in EFL reading lessons as learning only with the help of traditional books appears to be boring for students. Based on the study results, it is obvious that working on electronic texts through inquiry-based approaches has assisted students in completely changing their negative attitudes toward reading and increased engagement and autonomy. Consequently, because of the decreasing interest in reading through traditional books, there is a need of promoting more student-centered teaching practices and increase technology integration in the teaching and learning process.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Abrams, E., Southerland, S., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (2007). Inquiry in the Classroom: Realities and Opportunities. North Carolina: IAP- Information Age Publishing.
3. Alameddine, M.M., Ahwal, H.W. (2016). Inquiry-based teaching in literature classrooms. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 332-337.
4. 4. Bayram, Z., Oskay, O.O., Erdem, E., Ozgur, S.D., & Sen, S. (2013). Effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 988-996. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.112.
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London, Rutledge.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design (International Student Edition): Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE Publications.
7. Cutter, M. (2015). Using Technology with English Language Learners in the Classroom. Master’s Thesis, New York: St. John Fisher College.
8. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179
9. Genesee, F. (1994). Integrating Language and Content: Lessons from Immersion. UC Berkeley: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
10. Hoven, D. (1999). A model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 73-90.
11. Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084
12. Ilter, B. G. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4), 136-158.
13. International Baccalaureate Organization. (2020). Personal inquiries in the PYP. United Kingdom.
14. Johnson, S. A., & Cuevas, J. (2016). The effects of inquiry project-based learning on student reading motivation and student perceptions of inquiry learning processes. Georgia Educational Researcher, 13(1), 51-85. DOI: 10.20429/ger.2016.130102.
15. Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniote, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
16. Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15–22. DOI:10.1598/RT.64.1.2
17. Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
18. Lee, H. Y. (2014). Inquiry-based teaching in second and foreign language pedagogy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6), 1236-1244. DOI:10.4304/jltr.5.6.1236-1244.
19. Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2011). Mining students’ inquiry actions for understanding of complex systems. Computers & Education, 56(3), 556-573. DOI:1016/j.compedu.2010.09.015
20. Maxwell, D. O., Lambeth, D. T., & Cox, J. T. (2015). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16 (1), 1-31.
21. Mohammed, M. I. (2015). The perceptions of students and teachers about the benefits of and barriers to technology aided EFL. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 13, 85-99.
22. Murdoch, K. (2006). Inquiry learning: journeys through the thinking processes. Teacher Learning Network, 13(2), 32–34.
23. Rejeki, S. (2017). Inquiry-based language learning (IBLL): Theoretical and practical views in English classroom. English Franca, 1(02), 135-148.
24. Shamsudin, N. M., Abdullah, N., & Yaamat, N. (2013). Strategies of teaching science using an inquiry based science education (IBSE) by novice Chemistry teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 583-592. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.129
25. Sotiriou, S. A., Lazoudis, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Inquiry-based learning and E-learning: how to serve high and low achievers. Smart Learning Environments. 7(29), 24-27.
26. Tabari, I. G., & Tabari, A. G. (2014). Application of computer and technology in EFL syllabus design. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 376-381. DOI:10.4304/jltr.5.2.376-381
27. Yoon, T. (2013). Beyond the traditional reading class: The application of an e-Book in EFL English classroom. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(1), 17-26. DOI:10.5861/ijrsll.2012.93
Copyright (c) 2022 Irina Chikovani, Ekaterine Pipia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
