National Dialogue of Ethiopia: is it on the right track?

  • Dehinasew Shemelis Andualem PhD candidate in Peace and Development College of Social Sciences and Humanities Institute of Peace and Development studies Haramaya University, Ethiopia
Keywords: National Dialogue, Ethiopia, Principles, Process, the Right Track


National dialogues are nationally owned political processes made when there happen profound political crisis that the existing government of a given country cannot solve. Ethiopia too is on the process of conducting national dialogue. This paper analyses the ongoing process of the dialogue against national dialogue principles that the United States Institute of Peace, Berghof Foundation, and others use to predict the success or the failure of a national dialogue. The data were collected from secondary sources such as books, televisions channels, websites, and so on. Then the collected data were qualitatively analyzed to evaluate the process of the dialogue. After analyzing the views of political elites, and other concerned citizens of the country towards the actual process of Ethiopia’s national dialogue in terms of the principles used as yardsticks, the paper concludes that the ongoing process of the planned national dialogue of Ethiopia is not on the right way to achieve the desired goal.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Ariye. E., C. (2015). A bystander to genocide: revisiting UN failure in the Balkans and Rwanda. European Scientific Journal,11(11):325-333.
2. Berghof Foundation. (2017). National Dialogue Handbook: A Guide for Practitioners. Burlin: Berghof Foundation Operations GmbH press.
3. Berghof Foundation, 2022. Working towards an Ethiopian national dialogue.
(Accessed on March 10,2022).
4. Blunck, M.,Vimalarajah, L.,Wils,O., Burg, C.,V., Lanz, D., and Mubashir,M. (2017). National dialogue handbook: A guide for practitioners. Berlin: Berghof Foundation. ).
5. Buayalew, Y. (2022, March 25). The first congress of the council of Amhara National Regional State. Bahir Dar:Amhara Media Corporation.
6. Edjeta, B. (2022, 12 March, ). Ethiopia’s stillborn National Dialogue. Ethiopia Insight. (Accessed on May 15, 2022). (
7. Ekubamichael, M. (2022, February 22). News: National Dialogue Commission ‘failed before formation’ – Balderas Party. Addis Standard, p. 2. (Accessed on March 10,2022).
8. Ethiopian National Dialogue Commission Establishment [Draft] Proclamation. (2021). (Accessed on March 9, 2022). (
9. Gedamu, Y. (2022, January 27). Ethiopia’s new national dialogue can unify the divided nation. Aljazeera,P.1. (Accessed on March 10, 2022). (
10. Gemechu, M, M. (2022, January 27). Ethiopia’s new ‘national dialogue’ cannot deliver inclusive peace. Aljazeera, P. 1. (Accessed on March 10).
11. Haider, H. (2019). National Dialogues: Lessons Learned and Success Factors, Helpdesk report. (Accessed on March 15, 2022). (
12. Harlander, J. (2016). Supporting a national dialogue: Dilemmas & options for third parties. Mediation practice series. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.
13. IFSS (Institute for Security studies). (2020). Ethiopia can learn from its neighbours about national dialogue. (Accessed on March 15, 2022). (
14. Inclusive Peace.(nd). National Dialogues. (Accessed on March 20, 2022).
15. Kraetzschmar, H. ( 2015, October 9). How the Tunisian national dialogue saved a country from collapse. Reuters, p.1. (Accessed on March 15, 2022).
16. Kungu, D., M., Omari, R., and Kipsang, S. (2015). A journey into the indigenous conflict management mechanisms among the Abakuria community, Kenya: “the beauty and the beast”. European scientific Journal, 11(16):202-217
17. Legesse Tulu . (2022, January 15). Live Africa. YouTube, CGTN Africa. (Accessed on March 10,2022).
18. Mulatu, G. (2022, March 21). Fana Woktawi. Addis Ababa, Fana Television.
19. NH (the New Humanitarian). (2022). Ethiopia launches a national dialogue, but divisions run deep. (Accessed on May 14, 2022). (,opposition%20parties%20were%20not%20consulted.).
20. Odivilas, H., A. (2016). Functionality of Service-oriented Institutions Vis-à-vis Rural Development Situation in Eastern Samar, Philippines. European Scientific Journal,12 (17):50-61
21. Ozkan, E., and Cetin, H. C. (2016). The Realist and Liberal Positions on the Role of International Organizations in Maintaining World Order. European Scientific Journal, 12(17):85-96
22. USIOP (United States Institute of Peace). (2015). National Dialogues: A Tool for Conflict Transformation? (Accessed on March 12, 2022). (
23. Woldegiorgis, D. (2022, January 16). A National Dialogue for Transition in Ethiopia. Borkena. Page 2. (Accessed on March 5, 2022).
( See (
How to Cite
Andualem, D. S. (2022). National Dialogue of Ethiopia: is it on the right track?. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 18(20), 71.
ESJ Humanities