THE MISUNDERSTANDING OF OUTCOME MONITORING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON INSTRUMENTAL LEADERSHIP

  • Elia Pizzolitto University G. D’Annunzio – Chieti-Pescara – Italy Department of Business Economics
Keywords: instrumental leadership, output, performance, monitoring, complexity

Abstract

In this paper, through a systematic literature review, I argue that the scientific study of instrumental leadership has been the object of a misunderstanding of its fourth dimension, that is, outcome monitoring. The general conceptualization of this dimension, which interprets outcome monitoring as an activity consisting of performance supervision and feedback provision, is highly reductive. Outcome monitoring allows instrumental leaders to modify their style and behavior depending on followers’ performance and environmental conditions. After the descriptive analysis, the article presents a content analysis performed using a grounded approach. The study conducts the design of a thematic map that highlights the complex nature of instrumental leadership’s outcome monitoring, linking performance and context in a self-empowering circuit, in which instrumental leaders, through outcome monitoring, modify the contextual conditions and their actions, strategies, and behavior. Finally, I present some recommendations for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agostino, D., Arena, M., & Arnaboldi, M. (2013). Leading change in public organisations: the role of mediators. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-12-2011-0123
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2002). An analysis of the full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 3–34). JAI Press.
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2004, June). On instrumental leadership: beyond transactions and transformations. UNL Gallup Leadership Institute Summit, Omaha, USA.
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2013). Addendum: A Re-Analysis of the Full-Range Leadership Theory – The Way Forward. In Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition (Monographs in Leadership and Management, Vol. 5) (pp. 35–37). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005007
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005
Antonakis, J., House, R. J., & Simonton, D. K. (2017). Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000221
Beach, D. (2004). The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: the role and influence of the Council Secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 408–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/rjpp13501760410001100279
Bryman, A., Stephens, M., & Campo, C. (1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90025-9
Benedetti Chammas, C., & Hernandez, J. M. D. C. (2019). Comparing transformational and instrumental leadership. Innovation & Management Review, 16(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0064
Feng, C., Patel, P. C., & Sivakumar, K. (2020). Chief global officers, geographical sales dispersion, and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 121, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.011
Gerlach, F., Hundeling, M., & Rosing, K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: a longitudinal study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-07-2019-0321
Greene, C. N., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1980). Leader-group interactions: A longitudinal field investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.50
Kahn, L. S. (1984). Group Process and Sex Differences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1984.tb00636.x
Kramer, M. W., Day, E. A., Nguyen, C., Hoelscher, C. S., & Cooper, O. D. (2018). Leadership in an interorganizational collaboration: A qualitative study of a statewide interagency taskforce. Human Relations, 72(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718763886
Landeweerd, J. A., & Boumans, N. P. G. (1994). The effect of work dimensions and need for autonomy on nurses’ work satisfaction and health. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00563.x
Li, M., & Patel, P. C. (2019). Jack of all, master of all? CEO generalist experience and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(3), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.006
Mannheim, B. F., Rim, Y., & Grinberg, G. (1967). Instrumental Status of Supervisors as Related to Workers’ Perceptions and Expectations. Human Relations, 20(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676702000405
McKee, R. A., Lee, Y. T., Atwater, L., & Antonakis, J. (2018). Effects of personality and gender on self-other agreement in ratings of leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(2), 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12209
Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, J. F., & Locander, W. B. (2008). Critical Role of Leadership on Ethical Climate and Salesperson Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9839-4
Rowold, J. (2014). Instrumental Leadership: Extending the Transformational-Transactional Leadership Paradigm. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 28(3), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221402800304
Schriesheim, C. A., & DeNisi, A. S. (1981). Task dimensions as moderators of the effects of instrumental leadership: A two-sample replicated test of path-goal leadership theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(5), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.5.589
Schriesheim, J. F., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1980). A test of the path-goal theory of leadership and some suggested directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 33(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02356.x
Smeets, S., & Beach, D. (2019). Political and instrumental leadership in major EU reforms. The role and influence of the EU institutions in setting-up the Fiscal Compact. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1572211
Tung, F. C., & Yu, T. W. (2016). Does innovation leadership enhance creativity in high-tech industries? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(5), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-09-2014-0170
Turk, H. (1961). Instrumental Values and the Popularity of Instrumental Leaders. Social Forces, 39(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573217
van Vugt, M., & de Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587
Waldersee, R., & Eagleson, G. (2002). Shared leadership in the implementation of re‐orientations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(7), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730210445838

Other references

Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2016). Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102
Avolio, B. J. (2011). Full Range Leadership Development. SAGE Publications.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Developing Potential Across a Full Range of Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barker, R. A. (2001). The Nature of Leadership. Human Relations, 54(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701544004
Connelly, M. S., Gilbert, J. A., Zaccaro, S. J., Threlfall, K., Marks, M. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00043-0
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications.
Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Gronn, P. (2008). Hybrid Leadership. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence (1st ed., pp. 35–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868539
Güntner, A. V., Klonek, F. E., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Follower behavior renders leader behavior endogenous: The simultaneity problem, estimation challenges, and solutions. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(6), 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101441
Hunt, J. G. (1991). Leadership: A New Synthesis (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Pizzolitto, E., & Verna, I. (2020). Vocational Identity Development and the Role of Human Resources Management. A Systematic Literature Review. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 16(34). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n34p80
Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). Advancing Theory with Review Articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12549
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
Published
2022-07-06
How to Cite
Pizzolitto, E. (2022). THE MISUNDERSTANDING OF OUTCOME MONITORING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON INSTRUMENTAL LEADERSHIP. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 7(1), 1. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/15528
Section
ESI Preprints