Possibility to Identify Projectiles and Other Components of the Cartridges by Consideration on Barrels and Projectiles Types

  • Giorgi Dzindzibadze Grigol Robakidze University, School of Law, Tbilisi, Georgia Workplace: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, Forensic-Criminalistics Department, Examination Division, Ballistic Expertise Section. Head of the First Subunit/Chief Expert
Keywords: Polygonal rifling, traditional rifling, smooth bore, barrel, bullet, identification

Abstract

There are basically three types of barrels - polygonal rifling, traditional (conventional) rifling, and smooth bore, accordingly, the internal shape of the barrels is different. Therefore, the projectiles passed in these barrels have different marks of form, some more depicted, some less so. Identifying private signs is necessary for comparison. If such marks do not remain on the surface of the bullet, then it will be unusable for identification, because, the identification process should be based on a comparison of general and individual marks.

This issue has been explored and reflected in the article, in which case it is possible to conduct identification research on bullets. The article also analyzes what issues the expert should consider when identifying.

It is probably clear to everyone that it is impossible to conduct research of this scale on objects (shots, pellets, plastic containers) that do not have sufficient identification marks. Reasoned conclusion, which should be used in court as evidence, should be based on a combination of durable individual barrel channel marks with other bullets, or with a combination of durable individual barrel marks of the experimental weapon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bakhtadze, G. E., Golenev, V. S. (2019). A brief excursion into the history of the identification of smooth-bore firearms by marks on projectiles. Criminalistics and Forensic Science, 1(22), 77-91.
2. Balashov, D. N., Balashov, N. M., & Malikov S. V. (2005). Criminalistics. Moscow. In Russian.
3. Bertovsky, L. V. (2018). Criminalistics, a textbook for bachelors. Moscow. RG-Press. In Russian.
4. Burrard, G. (1962). The Identification of Firearms and Forensic Ballistics. New York. A. S. Barnes and Co.
5. Council Directive of 18 June 1991 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons. (1991). Official Journal of the European Communities, 9 (13), 51-58.
6. Criminalistics. (2018). Edited by Bertovsky, L. V. Moscow. In Russian.
7. Criminalistics. (2007). Edited by Filippov, A. G. Moscow. In Russian.
8. Criminalistics of the socialist countries. (1986). Edited by Koldin, V. Ya. Moscow. In Russian.
9. Gunther, J. D., & Gunther, Ch. O. (2015). The Identification of Firearms. New York, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.
10. Heard, B. j. (2013). Forensic Ballistics in Court. Chichester, West Sussex. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
11. Kiely, T. F. (2006). Forensic Evidence: Science and the Criminal Law. Second edition. Boca Raton, FL. Taylor & Francis Group.
12. Kiely, T. F. (2001). Forensic Evidence: Science and the Criminal Law. Boca Raton, FL. Corporate Blvd.
13. Orlov, Yu. K. (2016). Modern Problems of Proving and Use of Special Knowledge in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow. LLC Prospekt. In Russian.
14. Saferstein, R. (2020). Criminalistics. An Introduction to Forensic Science. Thirteenth Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.
15. Saferstein, R. (2018). Criminalistics, An Introduction to Forensic Science. 12th edition. Boston. Pearson Education.
16. Sedlacek, C. H. (2012). Alternative Individual Cartridge Case Identification Techniques. Lincoln, Nebraska. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
17. Seleznev, A. V., Sysoyev, E. V. (2012). Forensic Expertise. Tambov. Publishing house FGBOU VPO „TSTU“. In Russian.
18. Sinha, J. K., Kshettry, M. L. (1972). Pellet Identification. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 63, 134-136.
19. Thomas, G., Fadul, Jr., Hernandez, G., Wilson, E., Stoiloff, S., & Gulati Sn. (2013). An Empirical Study to Improve the Scientific Foundation of Forensic Firearm and Tool Mark Identification Utilizing Consecutively Manufactured Glock EBIS Barrels with The Same EBIS Pattern. Final Report. Submitted By: Miami-Dade Police Department Crime Laboratory. Award Number: 2010-DN-BX-K269. Retrieved from https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/244232.pdf
20. Thompson, R. M. (2010). Firearm identification in the forensic science laboratory. Alexandria. National District Attorneys Association.
21. Warlow, T. (2012). Firearms, the Law, and Forensic Ballistics. Third Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Published
2022-07-15
How to Cite
Dzindzibadze, G. (2022). Possibility to Identify Projectiles and Other Components of the Cartridges by Consideration on Barrels and Projectiles Types. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 7(1), 298. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/15565
Section
ESI Preprints