Discourse Framing of Nigeria’s Developmental Issues and Government’s Interventionist Policies in Selected Televised National Addresses of President Muhammadu Buhari (2015 -2021)

  • Babatunde Omowaiye Orungbeja Department of Mass Communication, Babcock University, Nigeria
  • Kolade Ajilore Department of Mass Communication, Babcock University, Nigeria
Keywords: National Address, Good Governance, Human Development, Ideology, Language

Abstract

Public addresses constitute potent platforms through which public figures review their policies and articulate their plans. They provide insights to the priorities of the government, elicit public sympathy and support for the government. Contrarily, there has been a seeming dissonance between the national addresses of President Muhammadu Buhari and the reality of the Nigerian citizenry. To this effect, this research purposed to conduct a critical discourse analysis of President Buhari’s national addresses against the backdrop of development in Nigeria between 2015 and 2021. The research explicated the interplay between the concepts of language and ideology in text, for the enactment of human development. The general population of this research comprised all the 27 televised speeches delivered by President Muhammadu Buhari in Nigeria from 2015-2021. The targeted population of 20 national addresses were adopted using a purposive sampling technique. The addresses are the Inaugural Day address of 2015, all New Year’s Day addresses, Democracy Day addresses and all Independence Day addresses. Coding sheet was used to gather data directly from the original full text discourses of the President, as presented to the citizenry. The research findings show that the President’s discourses framed national development issues as direct and key responsibilities of the government which require strategic, sincere and effective interventionist policies. They also revealed nine recurrent themes in the President’s discourses to depict the President’s intense focus on national development in tandem with his pre-election campaign slogan of Security, Economy and Anti-corruption (SEA). The research uncovered linguistic frames comprising pragmatic speech acts of locution, illocution and perlocution in the President’s discourses, to highly and frequently reiterate his ideologies in ensuring national growth and development. The findings also revealed that the President’s discourses framed and propagated ideologies, dissimilar to his military antecedents, for the advancement of his national development interventionist policies. The research concluded that the interplay among President Muhammadu Buhari’s ideology and human development policies in the text of his national addresses between 2015 and 2021, consciously construed his administration’s interventionist policies for the enactment of socio political development against the excruciating challenges in the Nigerian nation. Thus, this research recommended that political leaders should ensure that subsisting problems and those envisaged as the foundation of social order in their societies; the value systems appropriate for social justice, wealth creation and distribution, social efficiency with moral sensitivity and concern for the common good, as deduced from the knowledge of shared values with their citizenry, are pragmatically tackled not only in the discourses, but as well experientially. This research also recommended that politicians and their speech writers should effectively and positively adopt the use of discourse framing to promote societal progressive growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Agbo, I. I., Ngwoke, F. U., & Ijem, B. U. (2019). Transitivity Processes in President Buhari’s ‘My Covenant With Nigerians.’ English Language Teaching, 12(4), 7. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p7
2. Ajogwu, F. (SAN). (2016). Nigeria Vision 2020 and a Challenging Economic Situation: Is Good Governance a Panacea?
3. Beetz, J., Herzog, B., & Maesse, J. (2021). Researching ideology and discourse as knowledge, power and material practices. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 16(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2021.1895180
4. Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2017.01.010
5. Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: a systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
6. Brekhus, W. H. (2015). Culture and cognition: Patterns in the social construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons.
7. Brennen, B. S. (2017). Qualitative research methods for media studies (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
8. Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing political speeches. (2nd Editio). Macmillan International Higher Education.
9. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice, 1–226. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
10. Chimbarange, A., Takavarasha, P., & Kombe, F. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of President Mugabe ’ s 2002 address to the World Summit on sustainable development. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 277–288.
11. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 10, 103–126.
12. Clark, H. (2011). Poorest countries must have a say in shaping their future. Least Developed Countries High Level Interactive Thematic Debate on Good Governance at All Levels.
13. Clark, N. (2017). Explaining political knowledge: the role of procedural quality in an informed citizenry. Political Studies, 65(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716632258
14. Cotties Adetiba, T. & Rahim, A. (2016). “Good Corporate and Sustainable Socio-political Development in Nigeria: A Discourse.” Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(10).
15. Council of Europe. (2018). 12 Principles of Good Governance and European Label of Governance Excellence (ELoGE). https://www.coe.int/en/web/good-governance/12-principles-and-eloge
16. David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (2011). National unity in multi-ethnic Malaysia: A critical discourse analysis of Tun Dr. Mahathir’s political speeches. Language, Discourse and Society, 1(1), 11–31.
17. Deane, J. (2016). Media and governance. GSDRC professional development reading pack no. 39 (Vol. 39).
18. Dijk, T. A. van. (2016). Social Movements , Frames and Discourse. 1–28.
19. Dimaculangan, N. G., & Dimaculangan, M. C. D. (2018). Hegemony In Pnoy’s And Duterte’s 1st State Of Nation Address: A Critical Discourse Analysis Of Person Deixis. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 23(2), 152–180. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol23no2.8
20. Dunu, I., & Ugbo, G. (2014). The Nigerian journalists; knowledge, perception and use of the freedom of information (FOI) law in journalism practices. Journal of Media and Communication Studies. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2013.0377
21. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis the critical research of language, second edition. In Critical Discourse Analysis The Critical Research of Language, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
22. Filardo-Llamas, L., & Boyd, M. S. (2017). Critical discourse analysis and politics. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 312–327. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342
23. Folarin, B., Oyero, O. & Ofulue, C. I. (2018). Advanced theories in mass communication. In JLS 811 Advanced Theories In Mass Communication. NOUN Press.
24. Herrick, J. (2015). The history and theory of rhetoric. In The History and Theory of Rhetoric (Issue 2017). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315664019
25. Javadi, J., & Mohammadi, M. (2019). A comparative critical discourse analysis of hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s language use in US presidential campaign: A new analytical framework for reading journalistic texts. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(4), 2201–2213.
26. Jega, A. M. (2012). Improving elections in Nigeria : lessons from 2011 and looking to 2015. African Jornal Meeting Summary, 1–12.
27. Kamalu, I., & Agangan, R. (2011). Language, Discourse & Society. Language and Society, 1, 1(December), 32–54.
28. Kepplinger, H. M., Geiss, S., & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing Scandals: Cognitive and Emotional Media Effects. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01653.x
29. Khan, Z., Karman, U., & Umar, L. (2019). A Critical Discourse Analysis of President Musharraf’s Speechs: Legitimizing War on Terror. University Islamabad, Pakistan, 14(4), 233–241.
30. Kingdom, E. O., & Maekae, J. (2013). The role of education in national development: Nigerian experience. European Scientific Journal, 9(28), 312–320.
31. Lawal, T., & Oluwatoyin, A. (2011). problems affecting national development as well as strategies for achieving sustainable development in Nigeria. Public Administration, 3(November), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR11.012
32. lyoha, F. O., Gberevbie, D. E., Iruonagbe, C. T. &, & Egharevba, M. E. (2015). Cost of governance in Nigeria: in whose interest?. International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering., London, 9(1), 245–252.
33. McCall, E. (2011). Communication for Development Strengthening the effectiveness of the United Nations. In Communication for Development Strengthening the effectiveness of the United Nations (p. 142). United Nations Development Programme.
34. McCombs, M. (1997). New frontiers in agenda setting: Agendas of attributes and frames. Mass Communication Review.
35. McQuail, D. (2005). Mass Communication Theory (5th ed.). Sage.
36. Mirzaei, A., Eslami, Z. R., & Safari, F. (2017). Exploring rhetorical-discursive practices of Rouhani’s Presidential campaign andvVictory of his prudence-and-hope key: a discourse of persuasion. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-161-182
37. Moti, U. G. (2019). Development plans and visions as a strategy for sustainable development: the experience of Nigeria. May.
38. Nwabueze, C. (2005). Mass media and community mobilization for development: an analytical approach. International Journal of Communicution, 2.
39. Ogbaki, P. E. (2011). Nigeria and leadership and good governance: Igwebuike perspectives. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9(1), 111–148.
40. Ogunmuyiwa, H. O. (2015). Critical discourse analysis of corruption in presidential speeches. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(12), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss12.484
41. Oladipo, O. (2008). Thinking about philosophy: a general guide. Hope Publication.
42. Omenugha, K. A., Uzuegbunam, C. E., & Omenugha, O. N. (2014). Good governance and media ownership in Nigeria: dilemmatic practices, stoic challenges. Global Media Journal African Edition. https://doi.org/10.5789/7-2-133
43. Omona, J. (2010). Meeting the millennium development goals’ targets: Proposed UN global governance framework to confront challenges of the 21st Century. Journal of Social Development in Africa, 25(1), 129–159. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsda.v25i1.54282
44. Pieterse, J. N. (2010). Development theory deconstructions / reconstructions (Second). SAGE Publications, Inc.
45. Pritchard, J. (2014). Practice question. Nursing Older People. https://doi.org/10.7748/nop.26.8.16.s22
46. Reinert, E. S. (2001). Increasing poverty in a globalised world: Marshall plans and Morgenthau plans as mechanisms of polarisation of world incomes.
47. Ritchie, J. E., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. (J. & R. J. Lewis (ed.)). SAGE Publications Ltd.
48. Rubic-Remorosa, R. (2018). President Rodrigo Roa Duterte’s political speeches : a critical discourse analysis. 23(8), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2308027287
49. Sarah J. Tracy. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. In Radiologic technology (Vol. 82, Issue 2). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000002303002
50. Sarfo, E., & Krampa, E. A. (2013). Language at war: A critical discourse analysis of speeches of Bush and Obama on terrorism. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 3(2), 378–390.
51. Sebudubudu, D. (2010). The impact of good governance on development and poverty in Africa: Botswana -A relatively successful African initiative. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 4(7), 249–262.
52. Sipra, M. A., & Rashid, A. (2013). Critical discourse analysis of Martin Luther King’s apeech in socio-political perspective. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 4(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.4n.1p.27
53. Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
54. Ugwuanyi, G. O. (2014). The Economic Implications of National Development Plans : The Nigerian Experience ( 1946-2013 ). Developing Country Studies, 4(9), 171–180.
55. UNDP. (1990). Human Development Report 1990. Concept and Measurement of Human Development. In United Nations Development Programme.
56. UNDP. (2020). Human Development Report 2020, The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. Briefing note - Nigeria. 1–7.
57. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (n.d.). Good Governance and Human Rights.
58. van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
59. World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the law. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7
60. Yagnik, A. (2018). Communication for development and social change through creativity. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change (Issue February). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_102
61. https://africa.businessinsider.com/local/markets/nigeria-maintains-her-lead-as-the-largest-economy-in-africa-26th-largest-economy/t62z11j.
62. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-12890807
63. https://bluemington.com/national-development-meaning-scope/ 20 October, 2018.
64. https://www.electoralgeography.com/new/en/countries/n/nigeriahttps://www.france24.com/en/20150331-military-buhari-defeats-nigeria-goodluck-jonathan-presidential-vote
65. https://www.nationalpivot.com/2021/05/just-in-nigeria-is-at-point-of-no.html.
66. https://thenationonlineng.net/buhari-faults-clampdown-on-boko-haram-members/.Downloaded 19, June, 2022.
67. https://saharareporters.com/2021/03/24/6-things-buhari-criticised-2015-got-worse-under-him-president
Published
2022-11-30
How to Cite
Orungbeja, B. O., & Ajilore, K. (2022). Discourse Framing of Nigeria’s Developmental Issues and Government’s Interventionist Policies in Selected Televised National Addresses of President Muhammadu Buhari (2015 -2021). European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 11, 734. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/16169
Section
ESI Preprints