Division, Persecution and Rearrangement - The AKP’s Controversial Relationship with Turkish Civil Society

  • Seref Turkmen National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary Doctoral School of Public Administration Sciences
Keywords: Turkey, civil society, open society, authoritarian rule, freedom of association

Abstract

Throughout history, and especially in the Ottoman Empire, Turkish culture has attached great importance to foundations. In the past, mosques, schools, public baths, free kitchens, and hospitals alike, all operated in the form of foundations. After the proclamation of the republic in 1923, much of this structure was abolished by the state founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk because he believed that they were tied to the Muslim clergy by a thousand threads. In the initial period of the republic, Turkish civil society was slowly reorganized following Western examples. It lived its second heyday as a result of the introduction of the new constitution in 1982 and Turgut Ozal’s liberal economic policy, and his media market liberalization after 1983. After the Justice and Development Party came to power in 2002, the civil society in Turkey was significantly rearranged. Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s party favored some with a system of opportunities, and sued those who put the government in a politically awkward position. Building on some of the scandalous cases of the second half of 2010s, this article seeks to explain the current situation of Turkish civil society and the conflicts that characterize it. The article highlights the campaign against Amnesty International and the Open Society Foundation, which by November 2021 was only partially over. In the case of current events, in the absence of scientific sources, the writings of renowned Turkish journalists at world-famous news portals were used as a basis. However, in order to substantiate the theory, an abundant literature in Turkish and English was also used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Akinci, B. (2020). Covıd-19 pandemisi sonrasında sivil toplum kuruluşları: Artçı değişimlerin sivil toplum kuruluşlarının işlevsel rollerine yansımaları. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 7(55), 1809-1816
2. Altunisik, M. B. (2019). Turkey’s Humanitarian Diplomacy: The AKP Model. CMI Brief, 8, 1-5
3. Cicek, C. (2017). 2013–2015 Çözüm Süreci’nde Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları, Baris Vakfi, Istanbul
4. Diez, T., Agnantopoulos, A. & Kaliber, A. (2005). File: Turkey, Europeanization and Civil Society: Introduction. South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 1-15
5. Dogan, E. & Genc, H. D. (2021). Early-Responding Civil Society and a Late Coming State: Findings from Turkey during the Pandemic. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 12(1), 127–146
6. Doyle, J. L. (2018). Government co-option of civil society: exploring the AKP’s role within Turkish women’s CSOs. Democratization, 25(3), 445-479
7. Keyman, F., Tocci, N. & Werz, M. (eds.) (2017). Trends in Turkish Civil Society. Center for American Progress, Istanbul Policy Center and Istituto Affari Internazionali, Istanbul
8. Metin, O. (2011). Sosyal Politika Açısından AKP Dönemi: Sosyal Yardım Alanında Yaşananlar. Calisma ve Toplum, 28(1), 179-200
9. Sahin, O. & Akboga, S. (2019). Türkiye’de Devlet-Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları İlişkisi ve Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarına Katılım. International Journal of Political Science & Urban Studies - Uluslararası Siyaset Bilimi ve Kentsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 405-427
10. Turkut, E. (2020). Osman Kavala v Turkey: Unravelling the Matryoshka Dolls. European Human Rights Law Review, 3, 288-297
11. Yabanci, B. (2019). Turkey’s tamed civil society: Containment and appropriation under a competitive authoritarian regime. Journal of Civil Society, 15(4), 285-306
12. Yalcin, S. (2015). Civil Society in Turkey’s Shrinking Political Space. Turkish Policy Quaterly, 13(4), 82-90
13. Farooq, U. (2021). Turkish court extends detention of philanthropist Osman Kavala (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/8/turkish-court-extends-detention-of-philanthropist-osman-kavala) Downloaded: 1st November, 2021
14. Sayin, A. (2021). 10 büyükelçiliğin Osman Kavala açıklaması ve sonrasında yaşananlar, AKP ve MHP kulislerinde nasıl yorumlanıyor? (https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-59079381) Downloaded: 1st November, 2021
15. Simsek, B. (2020). Büyükada Davası'nda karar: Af Örgütü Türkiye Şubesi Onursal Başkanı Taner Kılıç dahil dört sanığa hapis cezası. (https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-53273093) Downloaded: 1st November, 2021
16. Tahincioglu, G. (2021). “Büyükada’da ajanlık” iddiaları yine boşa düştü: “Ne gizli toplantı yapmak ne de biber gazına karşı olmak hukuka aykırı” (https://t24.com.tr/haber/buyukada-da-ajanlik-iddialari-yine-bosa-dustu-ne-gizli-toplanti-yapmak-ne-de-biber-gazina-karsi-olmak-hukuka-aykiri,957876) Downloaded: 1st November, 2021
17. Tamkin, E. (2018). Turkey Wants to Veto Civil Society Organizations at the OSCE. (https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/04/20/turkey-wants-to-veto-civil-society-organizations-at-the-osce/) Downloaded: 1st November, 2021
18. Unker, P. (2020). Turkey tightens control over NGOs to 'combat terrorism' (https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-tightens-control-over-ngos-to-combat-terrorism/a-56088205) Downloaded: 1st November, 2021
Published
2023-02-28
How to Cite
Turkmen, S. (2023). Division, Persecution and Rearrangement - The AKP’s Controversial Relationship with Turkish Civil Society. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14, 498. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/16499
Section
ESI Preprints