The UN’s’ Development Goals, the AACSB, and the Political Economy of Illusion

  • Richard E. Wagner Emeritus Professor of Economics George Mason University, USA
Keywords: Fiscal illusion; Amilcare Puviani; Vilfredo Pareto; accreditation and AACSB; UN development goals; bureaucratic imperative; entangled political economy

Abstract

In 1903 the Italian economist Amilcare Puviani articulated a theory of fiscal illusion to promote better understanding of the course of political action. Puviani created his theory to explain the failure of political pronouncements to reflect the reality to which those pronouncements claimed to pertain. Several commentators have since amplified Puviani’s recognition that political action operates through fomenting illusion within the citizenry. In contemporary times, the United Nations has articulated 17 pleasant sounding goals for global development. Further, the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) amplifies the UN in insisting that business schools incorporate those development goals into their curricula. After describing the theory of fiscal illusion, this essay explains how the AACSB’s promotion of the UN’s development goals provides a case study of the bureaucratic imperative which both the AACSB and the UN reflect, and with that imperative illustrating the political economy of fiscal illusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Arendt, H. 1972. Crisis of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace. Backhaus, J.G. and Wagner, R.E. 2004a. Debt, Money, and Public Finance. In Handbook of Public Finance, ed. by Jürgen G. Backhaus and Richard E. Wagner. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 195-215.
2. Bachaus, J.G. and Wagner, R.E. 2005. Redistribution, Poor Relief, and the Welfare State. In Handbook of Public Finance, ed. by Jürgen G. Backhaus and Richard E. Wagner. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 385-405.
3. Beito, G.S. 2000. From mutual aid to the welfare state. Chapel Hill: University of North m Carolina Press.
4. Berman, H. 1983. Law and Revolution: The formation of the western legal tradition. Cambridge, M\A: Harvard University Press.
5. Buchanan, J.M. 1960. The Italian tradition in fiscal theory. In J.M. Buchanan, ed., Fiscal Theory and Political Economy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 24-74.
6. Devereaux, A. and Wagner, R.E. 2020. Contrasting Visions for Macroeconomic Theory: DSGE and OEE. American Economist 65: 28-50.
7. De Viti de Marco, A. 1888. Il carattere teorico dell’economia. Rome: Pasqualucci.
8. Ellul, J. 1967. The Political Illusion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
9. Epstein, R.A. 1995. Simple rules for a complex world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hahn, L.A. 1949. The Economics of Illusion: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy. New York: Squier Publishing.
10. Hutt, W.H. 1963. Keynesianisn--Retrospect and Prospect: A Critical Restatement of Basic Economic Principles. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
11. Jacobs, J. 1992. Systems of Survival. New York: Random House.
12. Klemperer, V. 1957. The Language of the Third Reich. New York: Continuum
13. Koppl, R. 2002. Big players and the economic theory of expectations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Koppl, R. 2018. Expert Failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. McGee, R.W. and Block, W.E. 2022. Is the AACSB requiring member schools to teach bad economics. Journal of Accounting Ethics and Public Policy 23: 383-403.
16. Micelli, T.J. 1998. Settlement Strategies. Journal of Legal Studies 20: 383-94.
17. Niskanen, W.A.1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Systems. Chicago: Aldine.
18. Pareto, V. 1916. Trattato di sociologica generale Florence: G. Barbéra. Translated into English as Mind and Society: A Treatise on General Sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935.
19. Pantaleoni, M. 1911. Considerazioni sulle properieta di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale degli Economisti Economisti 42: 9-29, 114-33.
20. Podemska-Mikluch, M. and Wagner, R.E. 2013. Dyads, tridats, and the theory of exchange. Review of Austrian Economics 26: 171-82.
21. Puviani, A. 1903. Teoria della illusione finanziaria. Palermo: Sandron.
22. Riker, W. The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.
23. Smith, A. and Yandle, B. 2014. Bootleggers and Baptists: How economic forces and moral persuasion interact to shape regulatory politics. Washington: Cato Institute.
24. Tullock, G. 1965. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington: Public Affairs Press.
25. Yandle, B. 1983. Bootleggers and Baptists: The education of a regulatory economist. Regulation (Cato Institute) May/June: 12-16.
26. Yazigi (Shamoun), D. and Wagner, R.E. 2014. Form vs. substance in selection through competition: Elections, markets, and political economy. Public Choice 159: 503-14.
27. Wagner, R.E. 2016. Politics as a Peculiar Business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28. Wagner, R.E. 2020. Macroeconomics as Systems Theory: Transcending the Micro- Macro Dichotomy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Wagner, R.E. 2022. Rethinking Public Choice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
30. Weaver, A.C. 1982, The Crisis in Social Security. Durham, NY: Duke University Press.
Published
2023-04-22
How to Cite
Wagner, R. E. (2023). The UN’s’ Development Goals, the AACSB, and the Political Economy of Illusion. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 16, 245. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/16674
Section
ESI Preprints