Advantage of Backwardness: The Effect of Industrialisation on European Modern Design Movement

  • Zhiyong Wang Chongqing Technology and Business University, China
Keywords: European modern design, social origin, historical sociology, comparative study, advantage of backwardness

Abstract

To answer specific questions of modern design history, historical analysis is needed, alongside chronicles and narrative, to promote deeper understanding. This paper, with the assistance of advantage of backwardness theory and the method characterised by historical sociology, focuses on the social origin of European modern design against the background of the industrial revolution. It aims to understand the link between technological change and the rise of modern design in Europe. The study starts with an explanation of the progress of industrialisation within those countries that were closely related to European modern design movement, and then investigates how this process diversely impacted the emergence of modern design in Europe through a comparative analysis on the interactive connection between industrialisation (as a case of technological change in modern times) and European modern design movement (as a cultural and social consequence of the change). This study particularly clarifies why the subsequent industrial countries, instead of the early industrial countries, had dramatically obtained the advantage to fully develop the modern design movement in Europe. It concludes that, in terms of technological change, advantage of backwardness played an important part in the origin of European modern design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Anderson, P. (2013a). Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.
2. Anderson, P. (2013b). Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: Verso.\
3. Baljon, C. (2002). History of history and canons of design. Design Studies, 23 (3), 333-343.
4. Banham, R. (1980). Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
5. Barraclough, G. (1991). Main Trends in History. New York and London: Holmes & Meier.
6. Bloch, M. (1964). The Historian’s Craft. New York: Vintage.
7. Burke, P. (2015). History and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
8. Cameron, R. & Neal, L. (2002). A Concise Economic History of the World: from Paleolithic Times to the Present. New York: Oxford university Press.
9. Collingwood, R. (1994). The Idea of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Cruickshank, D. eds. (1996). Sir Banister Fletcher’s A History of Architecture. Oxford: Architectural Press.
11. Delanty, G. & Esin, E. eds. (2003). Handbook of Historical Sociology. London: Sage Publications.
12. Dilnot, C. (1984). The state of design history, Part Ⅰ: Mapping the Field. Design Issue, 1 (1), 4-23.
13. Dilnot, C. (1984). The state of design history, Part Ⅱ: Problems and Possibilities. Design Issue, 1 (2), 3-20.
14. Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Fiedler, J. & Feierabend, P. eds. (2000). Bauhaus. Cologne: Könemann Verlagsgesellschft mbH.
16. Forty, A. (1992). Objects of Desire: Design and Society since 1750. London: Thames & Hudson.
17. Frampton, K. (2020). Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames & Hudson.
18. Frampton, K. (2007). The Evolution of 20th century Architecture: A Synoptic Account. Vienna: Springer.
19. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20. Kruft, H. (2013). Geschichte der Architekturtheorie. Munchen: Verlag C.H. Beck.
21. Margolin, V. (2007). Design for development: towards a history. Design Studies, 28 (2), 111-115.
22. Margolin, V. (2009). Design in history. Design Issue, 25 (2), 94-105.
23. Moore, B. (1993). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
24. Pevsner, N. (1985). The Sources of Modern Architecture and Design. London: Thames & Hudson.
25. Pevsner, N. (2005). Pioneers of Modern Design: from William Morris to Walter Gropius. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
26. Raizman, D. (2010). History of Modern Design. London: Laurence King Publishing.
27. Rickert, H. (1926). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen: Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
28. Riseboro, B. (1982). Modern Architecture and Design: An Alternative History. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29. Ruskin, J. (2012). The Seven Lamps of Architecture. New York: Dover Publications.
30. Skocpol, T. eds. (2012). Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Skocpol, T. (2015). State and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Sparke, P. (2019). An introduction to Design and Culture. London: Routledge.
33. Spengler, O. (1991). The Decline of the West. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Stavrianos, L. (1991). A Global History: From Prehistory to the 21st Century. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
35. Tullock, G. (1965). The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington: Public Affairs Press.
36. Veblen, T. (2003). Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
37. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
38. Weber, M. (2017). Methodology of Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.
39. Woodham, J. (1997). Twentieth-Century Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Published
2023-09-30
How to Cite
Wang, Z. (2023). Advantage of Backwardness: The Effect of Industrialisation on European Modern Design Movement. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 19(26), 1. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n26p1
Section
ESJ Humanities