Executing Quality Management Tools to Enhance Customer’s Journey at a Clothes Laundry Firm

Mohammed Alshahrani; Mahmoud Alabdali; Wafa Zaid; Rola Mohammod; Khalid S. M. Husain

doi:10.19044/esj.2023.v19n28p89

Mohammed Alshahrani Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Mahmoud Alabdali Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Wafa Zaid Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Rola Mohammod Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Khalid S. M. Husain Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n28p89

Keywords: Quality Management Tools, Customer Journey, Clothes Laundry Stores, ServQual, Customer Satisfaction, Customer Experience

Abstract

Purpose: This paper focuses on assessing and enhancing the customer’s journey at a laundry company in Saudi Arabia. This begins from the moment the customer arrives at the car park, including the process of receiving the services and subsequently making payment. Design, Methodology, Approach: A mixed-method approach was employed and qualitative data were gathered from focus group interviews and individual interviews. Quantitative data were gathered via the survey. Quality Management Tools were used to develop the action plan and offer conclusions and recommendations that would enhance the customer’s journey and improve satisfaction. Findings: Issues relating to service quality are categorized into five types: promotions, human resources, services, detergent products, and facilities. House of Quality represents the highest 15 prioritized solutions. These recommended solutions' relative weights range between 4 to 9%. The use of these tools highlights areas for improvement and the root causes of each issue. The voice of the customer and the voice of the employees are key sources to obtain valuable input. This research proffers step-by-step practical guideline for service organizations on how they can apply the quality management tools in their business, which will help them identify issues and continue improving. Its implications to academia merge the ServQual theory and QM in customer services and satisfactions. Originality/Value: This study will add value to the literature since there are limited studies employing the seven Quality Management Tools to enhance customer satisfaction and improve their journey. The Saudi laundry market specifically has a dearth of this type of study. The leadership of an organisation in the laundry sector is established through the implementation of tailored quality solutions, the prioritisation of customer satisfaction, and the enhancement of operational efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Alajhar, N. A., Almiqbel, E., Alamoudi, L., Mashat, R., & Husain, K. (2022). Implementing Quality Management Tools to Improve Customer’s Journey at Café. Open Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 2045-2090.‏
2. Al-Azzam, A. F. (2015). The impact of service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction: A field study of Arab bank in Irbid city, Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(15), 45-53.
3. Alwan, L. L. (2011). Application of “Matrix Diagrams Tools” for quality improvement in high education. Kufa Studies Center Journal, 1(23).
4. Amoako, G. K. (2022). Customer satisfaction: Role of customer service, innovation, and price in the laundry industry in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 23(1), 146-164.
5. Angell, L. C. & Klassen, R. D. (1999). Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 575-598.
6. Awasthi, A. & Chauhan, S. S. (2012). A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(2), 573-584.
7. Carnevalli, J. A. & Miguel, P. C. (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 737-754.
8. Cheng, Y. M. (2014). An exploration into cost-influencing factors on construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 850-860.
9. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons.
10. GIA. (2022). Global dry-cleaning and laundry services market to reach $75.1 billion by 2025. Retrieved from www.prnewswire.
11. Grand View Research (2021). Dry-cleaning & laundry services market size, share & trends analysis report by services (laundry, dry cleaning, duvet clean) by region, and segment forecasts, 2020-2027.
12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
13. Jones, E., Stanton, N. A., & Harrison, D. (2001). Applying structured methods to Eco-innovation: An evaluation of the Product Ideas Tree diagram. Design Studies, 22(6), 519-542.
14. Kwiecińska, B. (2015). Cause-and-effect analysis of ship fires using relations diagrams. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie.‏
15. Lemon, K. N. & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69-96.
16. Levesque, J. & Walker, H. F. (2007). The innovation process and quality tools. Quality Progress, 40(7), 18.
17. Lucero, A. (2015). Using affinity diagrams to evaluate interactive prototypes. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany, September 14-18, 2015, Proceedings, Part II 15 (pp. 231-248). Springer International Publishing
18. MacKenzie, I. S. (2012). Human-computer interaction: An empirical research perspective.
19. Mangiaracina, R. & Brugnoli, G. (1970). The e-commerce customer journey: A model to assess and compare the user experience of the e-commerce websites. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 14(3), 1-11.
20. Marinescu, N. I., Ghiculescu, D., Ghiculescu, D., & Gonczi, R. (2010). Relationship diagram and tree diagram applied at increasing flexibility of ultrasonic electro discharge machining technology. Revista de Tehnologii Neconventionale, 14(2), 24.
21. Madigan, J. M. (1993). Measures matrix chart: A holistic approach to understanding operations. Quality Management Journal, 1(1), 77-86
22. Micheaux, A. & Bosio, B. (2019). Customer journey mapping as a new way to teach data-driven marketing as a service. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(2), 127-140.‏
23. Mizuno, S. & Bodek, N. (2020). The Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC). Management for Quality Improvement, 1(1), 214-217.
24. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
25. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
26. Pramono, S. N., Ulkhaq, M. M., Rachmadina, D. P., Trianto, R., Rachmadani, A. P., Wijayanti, W. R., & Dewi, W. R. (2018). The use of quality management techniques: The application of the new seven tools. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 15(2), 105-112.‏
27. Popescu, D. & Gîrboveanu, S. (2017). The management tools used in the decision-making process. Management and Marketing Journal, 15(1), 151-162.
28. ReportLinker (2022). Laundry care in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from https://www.reportlinker.com/p0153680/Laundry-Care-in-Saudi-Arabia.html
29. Tanimoto, S. L. (2008). Enhancing state-space tree diagrams for collaborative problem solving. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference: 5th International Conference, Diagrams 2008, Herrsching, Germany, September 19-21, 2008. Proceedings 5 (pp. 156-164). Springer Berlin Heidelberg
30. Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
31. Tovar-Perilla, N. J., Bermeo-Andrade, H. P., Torres-Delgado, J. F., & Gómez, M. I. (2018). Methodology to support decision-making in prioritization improvement plans aimed at agricultural sector: Case study. Dyna, 85(204), 356-363.
32. Wati, W. R., Anakotta, R., & Sudibyo, D. (2020). The use of tree diagram technique in teaching vocabulary. INTERACTION: Journal Pendidikan Bahasa, 7(2), 63-71.
33. Widjaja, W. & Takahashi, M. (2016). Distributed interface for group affinity-diagram brainstorming. Concurrent Engineering, 24(4), 344-358.
34. Yee, R. W., Yeung, A. C., & Cheng, T. E. (2010). An empirical study of employee loyalty, service quality and firm performance in the service industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 109-120.