Behavioral Public Administration (BPA): The need for a New Field (Literature Review)
Abstract
Modern scientific literature agrees on the issue that it is impossible to perceive public administration as a separate field. Public administration as a field, by general definition, includes the implementation of public policy and the structure and work of various actors (state or non-state) involved in the implementation process. Due to the voluminous nature of the mentioned field, it is not appropriate to consider them separately, because the organizations involved in the process of public policy implementation are not self-generated structures but each organization relies on human resources. Therefore, in the agenda of the scientific space, together with the research in the field of public administration, there was a need to use the results of the research of behavioral science. The paper specifically deals with the issue of analyzing the necessity of behavioral public administration as a field, which is analyzed through a literature review. The sources used to analyze the mentioned issue include relevant scientific articles and books. The purpose of the study is to determine and analyze the connection between behavioral science and the field of public administration, and the effectiveness of their combination, which leads to the broader goal of the study, which should answer the question of the necessity and effectiveness of the existence of behavioral public administration as a field. The relevance of the research stems from the broad nature of the field of public administration, which puts on the agenda the need to combine the achievements of various adjacent fields.
Downloads
Metrics
References
2. Behavioral Science Research Institute . (2007, June 19). https://bsri.swu.ac.th/en/. Retrieved from About Behavioral Science Research Institute (BSRI): http://bsris.swu.ac.th/iprc/4th/7.pdf
3. Bertelli, A. M., & Riccucci, N. M. (2022). What Is Behavioral Public Administration Good for? Public Administration Review, 179-183.
4. Bhanot, S. P., & Linos, E. (2019). Behavioral Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future. Public Administration Review.
5. Congdon, W. J., & Shankar, M. (2015). the white house social & behavioral sciences team: lessons learned from year one. Behavioral Science & Policy, 77–86.
6. Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2016). Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology. Public Administration Review.
7. IWASA, F. T., & DE ALMEIDA, F. C. (2020). BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE BIASES ON PUBLIC ADMINSTRATION DECISIONS. São Paulo : XXIII SEMEAD.
8. Jilke, S. (2016). Microfoundations, Microfoundations: Addressing "Big Questions" through a Behavioral Approach toward Public Administration. Newark: Rutgers University-Newark.
9. Lau, A. (2019, June 7). Innovating Singapore: One lab's journey to change government for good. Retrieved from https://apolitical.co/home/: https://apolitical.co/solution-articles/en/innovating-singapore-one-labs-journey-to-change-government-for-good
10. Provan, K. G., & Milward, B. H. (2001). Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review, 414-423.
11. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York City: Macmillan.
Copyright (c) 2023 Gvantsa Dzidziguri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.