Inter-state Application at the EctHR as a Method to Benefit International Disputes

  • Zurab Aznaurashvili Assistant Professor, Grigol Robakidze University, Georgia
Keywords: Armed conflicts, European Convention, European Court, human rights

Abstract

According to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, every contracting state has the power to initiate inter-state applications against other states. The use of this procedure is rare due to political and diplomatic reasons; states primarily attempt to resolve disputes through diplomatic means. Despite this, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has extensive experience, and its decisions and judgments in inter-state conflicts have contributed to positive changes for the disputing parties.

The ECtHR consistently aligns with the main goals of the Council of Europe—rule of law, democracy, and human rights—and contributes to the improvement of relations between conflicting parties. This experience holds crucial importance for situations in conflict areas, and the court's case law benefits the relations between the conflicting parties.

Inter-state procedures can have a positive impact on the overall situation, and the outcomes can be significant for both parties involved in the conflict. In some conflicts, a legal clarification of facts and recommendations is necessary to initiate further actions and spur negotiations regarding these actions.

Therefore, it is evident that there is a clear need for methods within the legal framework and legal procedures to commence the process of improving the situation and pursuing the primary goal of the Council of Europe: achieving peace on the European continent..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. A. Drzemczewski, "The European Human Rights Convention: Protocol No. 11 – Entry into Force and First Year of Application", (2000) 21 Human Rights Law Journal 1.
2. D. Gomien, D. Harris and L. Zwaak, "Law and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter", Council of Europe, 1996.
3. M. Haas, "International Human Rights", Routledge, NY, the USA, 2008.
4. F.G. Jacobs, "The European Convention on Human Rights", Oxford University Press, Great Britain, 1975.
5. V. Mantouvalou and P. Voyatzis, "The CoE and the Protection of HRs: a System in need of Reform", Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law, Joseph and McBeth (Eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
6. A.H. Robertson and J.G. Merrills, "Human Rights in Europe: A Study of the European Convention of Human Rights", 3rd Edition, Manchester University Press, Manchester, the UK, 1993.
7. R.K.M. Smith, "Textbook on International Human Rights", 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, NY, 2007.
8. H.J. Steiner, P. Alston and R. Goodman, "International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals", 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, NY, the USA, 2008.

Cases:
9. Case Greece vs. United Kingdom, Application No. 17/6/56.
10. Case Greece vs. United Kingdom, Application No. 29/9/57.
11. Case United States vs. Melekh et.al., NY district court, 28.11.1960.
12. Case No.788/60 Austria vs. Italy, Decision of 11.1.61, Yearbook 4 p.116 (140).
13. Commission Report about the Greek Case in 5.11.69.
14. Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden vs. Greece, Application No. 44/48/70.
15. Denmark and others vs. Greece (Application No. 4448/70), Report of the Commission adopted on 4 October 1976.
16. Case Ireland vs. United Kingdom, Application No. 5310/71, Judgment of 18 January 1978, 25 Publ. Eur. Court H.R. 1, at 91 (1978).
17. Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden vs. Turkey, Applications 9940-9944/82, Commission decision of 6 December 1983 (1984), § 19, DR 35.
18. Loizidou v. Turkey judgment of 23 March 1995 (preliminary objections) (Series A no. 310).
19. Grand Chamber Decision as to the Admissibility of Application no. 48787/99 Ilie Ilaşcu and Others against Moldova and the Russian Federation.
20. Bankovic and Others vs. Belgium and Others, ECHR, Application no. 52207/99, Grand Chamber, 12 December 2001.
21. Case Denmark vs. Turkey (Application no. 34382/97), Judgment (Friendly settlement) 5 April 2000.
22. Cases Cyprus vs. Turkey (Applications 678/0/74, 69/50/75, 8/007/77 and 25781/94): Applications N° 6780/74 and N° 6950/75 Cyprus vs. Turkey, Decision of 26 May 1975 on the admissibility of the applications and Application No. 25781/94 – Judgment of May 10, 2001.
23. Deportation Case Admissibility Decision (Application no. 13255/07 GEORGIA vs. RUSSIA) lodged in 26 March 2007, considered admissible on 30 June 2008.
24. Second inter-state application GEORGIA vs. RUSSIA, case about the violation of human rights during the armed conflict in August 2008.
25. Application no. 15213/09 by Valeriy Dyanozovich Kulumbegov against Georgia lodged on 13 September 2008.
26. Application no. 20517/09 by Akhsartak Sergeyevich Bekoyev against Georgia lodged on 27 September 2008.
27. Case Abayeva and others v. Georgia (Applications nos. 52196/08, 52200/08, 49671/08, 46657/08 and 53894/08).
28. Pending application to the International Court of Justice about the Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia vs. Russian Federation).

Legal and Other Relevant Documents:
29. "European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms" signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, entered into force on 1953.
30. Agreement on the "Friendly Settlement of Application No. 34382/97 Denmark vs. Turkey".
31. Report of the UN Secretary-General concerning the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia, S/2002/88, 18.01.2002.
32. Human Rights Watch October 2007, "Russia’s Detention and Expulsion of Georgians" Volume 19 No. 5(D), p.3).
33. Information Note No. 94 on the case-law of the Court (ECHR), February 2007.
34. Annual Report to the General Assembly (A/62/306) by Special Rapporteur on Contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, sixty-second session, 24 August 2007.
35. Information Note No. 110 on the case-law of the Court (ECHR), July 2008.
36. Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (September 2009), http://www.ceiig.ch/Report.html (last visited in May 2010).
37. Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe Resolution 1633 (2008).
38. Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe Resolution 1647 (2009).
Published
2023-12-14
How to Cite
Aznaurashvili, Z. (2023). Inter-state Application at the EctHR as a Method to Benefit International Disputes. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 24, 574. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/17571
Section
ESI Preprints