Social Context of Civil Process for Sustainable Development
Abstract
A democratic society develops the concept of a social state, expressed in ensuring equal conditions for the participation of vulnerable persons in civil turnover. At the same time, humanity has agreed on a sustainable development plan, in which social sustainability is set as one of the main goals. Modern civil procedure law is mainly based on the codification of the 19th century, which in turn originates from the "Roman law" created precisely for the citizens of Rome. But since then, public relations have changed and modern technologies are constantly developing. The concept of a digital judge, smart contracts, and a blockchain system has already been developed. Therefore, it is necessary to update the civil procedure legislation to find out how it provides an equal platform for the participation of vulnerable persons in civil disputes. The purpose of this article is to discuss procedures for regulating civil disputes in a social context. As a result of identifying existing gaps, specific recommendations have been developed that will bring civil dispute resolution closer to sustainable development plans and ensure the participation of vulnerable persons in civil disputes on equal terms.
Downloads
Metrics
References
2. Eidenmüller, H. Wagner, G. (2021). Law by Algorithm, [Algorithmisches Recht.]. XII.
3. Kharitonashvili, J. (2021) Journal Association "SEPIKE" Edition 29, ECONOMICS THROUGH THE PRISM OF PLURALISM, 47. https://5b925ea6-3d4e-400b-b5f3-32dc681218ff.filesusr.com/ugd/b199e2_1629e175d01b454b9dfcbf05624499f4.pdf
4. Holland T., five elements of jurisprudence (5th ed. 1885) see in: Damaska,, a continental lawyer in an American Law Scholl: Trails and Tribulations of Adjustment” v. 116, U. Pennsylvania Law Review. 1968, 1365 p.
5. Clermont K. M., (2016). Civil Procedure's Five Big Ideas. Michigan State Law Review, 57.
6. Fabbi, A. (2013) PRIVATIZING’ CIVIL JUSTICE THROUGH PROCEDURAL AGREEMENTS: A COMPARATIVE LAW ANALYSIS, New York University, School of Law, 1.
7. Guarnieri, C., Pederzoli P. & Thomas Ch. A., (2002/1) The power of judges: a comparative study of courts and democracy European Secretariat for Scientific Publications, Oxford University Press. 160.
8. United Nations, Resolution A/RES/70/1 of September 25, 2015, https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1
9. Javakhishvili, I. History of the Georgian nation, 1908.
10. Chkonia Z., "Development of judicial organization and civil process in Georgia", (historical-legal analysis), Justice and Law, N3(42), 2014, 83.
11. Liluashvili T., Liluashvili G. & Khrustali V. Civil Procedural Law of Georgia, Part I, Tbilisi, 2014, 89.
12. Wisner, Blaikie, Cannon & Davis. (2003) At Risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, Second edition.
13. Oberhammer P. & Domej T., (005) European Traditions in Civil Procedure, edited by Van Rhee C.H., Intersentia Antwerpen – Oxford, 2, 121.
14. Klein, F. Pro Futuro (1891), https://diglib.uibk.ac.at/download/pdf/44?name=Pro%20futuro;
15. Van Rhee C.H., Uzelac A. (2012) The pursuit of truth in contemporary civil procedure: revival of accuracy or a new balance in favor of effectiveness? Truth and Efficiency in Civil Litigation. Fundamental Aspects of Fact-finding and Evidence-taking in a Comparative Context. 3.
16. Storme M. (2005) A Single civil procedure for Europe : A Cathedral builders’ dream, Ritsumeikan Law Review No. 22, 96-97.
17. ALI/UNIDROIT. (2005). on Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure Appendix: Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure (A Reporters’ Study), http://www.unidroit.org/. Rome.
18. ELI/UNIDROIT, Model European Rules of Civil Procedure, (2021)
19. OISD. Oxford University for Sustainable Development.
20. Cooper, J. A. (2001). AN INTRODUCTION TO CLASS ACTION PROCEDURE IN THE UNITED STATES.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nino Kharitonashvili
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
