Harmonizing Aesthetics and Psychological Well-being: An Indepth Exploration of the Integrative Impact of Dysport in Cosmetic Procedures
Abstract
This research endeavors to delve into the intricate interplay between aesthetic intelligence, aesthetic sensitivity, and psychological well-being within the framework of positive psychology. Recognizing the profound influence of environmental aesthetics on individuals' health and well-being, this study aims to illuminate the relationship between aesthetic intelligence and psychological well-being, with aesthetic sensitivity acting as a mediating factor. Employing a correlational research design, structural equation modeling was applied as the methodological approach. The research cohort comprised all students enrolled at Bu-Ali Sina University during the academic year 2018-2019. Employing cluster sampling, 384 students were selected based on the recommended sample size for structural equation modeling. The instruments employed in this study included the Ryff Well-being Scale (2), the Aesthetic Intelligence Scale developed by Rashid et al. (2017), and Abdulsalami's (2013) Aesthetic Sensitivity Scale. The findings derived from structural equations analysis revealed that both aesthetic intelligence and aesthetic sensitivity exerted a significant direct impact on psychological well-being. Furthermore, aesthetic intelligence demonstrated a direct and significant effect on aesthetic sensitivity. The exploration of indirect relationships indicated that aesthetic intelligence, acting through the mediation of aesthetic sensitivity, significantly influenced psychological well-being. Considering these outcomes, it can be inferred that individuals' awareness and appreciation of environmental beauty positively contribute to their psychological well-being. Consequently, the development of educational programs aimed at enhancing aesthetic capabilities in individuals holds the potential to elevate overall well-being.
Downloads
Metrics
References
2. Burns N, & Grove S. K. (2019). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice (5th ed.). MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.
3. Chatterjee, A. (2012). Neuroaesthetics: Growing pains of a new discipline. In A. P. Shimamura & S. E. Palmer (Eds.), Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience (pp. 299-317). Oxford University Press.
4. Duffy, R. A. (2018). An analysis of aesthetic sensitivity and creativity with other variables in grades four, six, eight, and ten. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(1), 26-30. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1979.10885199
5. Fancourt, D., Garnett, C., Spiro, N., West, R., & Müllensiefen, D. (2019). How do artistic creative activities regulate our emotions? Validation of the Emotion Regulation Strategies for Artistic Creative Activities Scale (ERS-ACA). PLoS One, 14(2), e0211362.
6. Ferguson, C. J., Coulson, M., & Barnett, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of pathological gaming prevalence and comorbidity with mental health, academic and social problems. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(12), 1573-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.005
7. Gardner, H. (2018). Effects of stimulus rearrangement on the development of sensitivity to painting styles. In G. Terry Suzanne, Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (Vol. 5, pp. 495-496), Washington, APA.
8. Greene, T., Gross, R., Amsel, L., & Hoven, C.W. (2018). The mental health of children and adolescents exposed to 9/11: Lessons learned and still to be learned. In A. M. Szema, World Trade Center pulmonary diseases and multi-organ system manifestations (pp. 121-136). Springer, Cham.
9. Ivon, H., & Kuscevic, D. (2019). School and the cultural-heritage environment: pedagogical, creative and artistic aspects. CEPS Journal, 3(2), 29-50.
10. Jacobsen, T. (2019). Bridging the arts and sciences: a framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39, 155-156. doi: 10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155
11. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2018). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369811
12. Lindauer, M. S. (2019). Toward a liberalization of experimental aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31(4), 459-465.
13. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2019). Subjective well-being. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 471-484). The Guilford Press.
14. Machotka, P. (2018). Aesthetic criteria in childhood: Justifications of preference. Child Development, 37(4), 877-885. doi: 10.2307/1126610
15. Mucha, R. T. (2019). Aesthetic intelligence cultivates an artistic mindset. Organization Development Journal, 26(3), 41-54.
16. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (2019). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10-19.
17. Ryff, C. D. (2021). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
18. Ryff, C. D. (2020). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28. doi: 10.1159/000353263
19. Van Cappellen, P., Toth-Gauthier, M., Saroglou, V., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021). Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 485-505. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9605-5
20. Walsh-Piper, K. (2018). Museum education and the aesthetic experience. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28(3), 105-115, doi: 10.2307/3333404
21. Wyatt T J. Oswalt, S B, Ochoa, Y. (2017). Mental health and academic performance of first-year college students. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 178-187.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mehrasa Nikandish, Mohammad Nikandish, Hedayatpour Behnoud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
