Do Vertical Contracts Lead to Foreclosure or to Efficiency Gains? An Empirical Study of the Food and Beverage Industry

  • Silvia Bertarelli Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Italy
Keywords: Vertical restraint, market dominance, heterogeneous productivity

Abstract

This paper presents a research method to determine whether vertical contracts concluded between firms operating at different levels of the supply chain are efficient from the perspective of the most recent industrial organisation theory. In this view, some case studies are presented concerning antitrust investigations against some large companies operating in the food and beverage sector in Italy. Despite the controversy surrounding the effects of vertical agreements, as they may be pro- or anti-competitive, the paper shows that not only market concentration but also intra-sectoral asymmetries are crucial factors to be assessed in order to distinguish between foreclosing and efficiency-enhancing agreements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Aghion, P., & Bolton, P. (1987). Contracts as barrier to entry. American Economic Review, 77(3), 388-401.
2. Bernheim, B. D., & Whinston, M. D. (1998). Exclusive Dealing. Journal of Political Economy, 106(1), 64-103.
3. Besanko, D., & Perry, M. K. (1993). Equilibrium incentives for exclusive dealing in a differentiated products oligopoly. RAND Journal of Economics, 24(4), 646-667.
4. Calzolari, G., & Denicolò, V. (2015). Exclusive contracts and market dominance. American Economic Review, 105(11), 3321-51.
5. De Meza, D., & Selvaggi, M. (2007) Exclusive contracts foster relationship-specific investment. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1), 85-97
6. Etro F. (2007). Competition, Innovation, and Antitrust. Springer.
7. Fumagalli, C., Motta, M., & Ronde, T. (2012). Exclusive dealing: the interaction between foreclosure and investment promotion. Journal of Industrial Economics, 60(4), 599-608.
8. Groh, C., & Spagnolo, G. (2004). Exclusive contracts, loss to delay and incentives to invest. CEPR discussion paper No. 4525.
9. O'Brien, D. P. (2020). The economics of vertical restraints in digital markets. The Global Antitrust Institute Report on the Digital Economy. Retrieved at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733686
10. Rasmusen, E. B., Ramseyer, J. M., & Wiley, J. S, Jr. (1991). Naked exclusion. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1137-1145.
11. Rey, P., & Vergé, T. (2008) The economics of vertical restraints, in P: Buccirossi (Ed.), Handbook of Antitrust Economics (pp. 353–390) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Segal, I. R. & Whinston, M. D. (2000) Naked Exclusion: comment. American Economic Review, 90(1), 296-309.
Published
2024-04-08
How to Cite
Bertarelli, S. (2024). Do Vertical Contracts Lead to Foreclosure or to Efficiency Gains? An Empirical Study of the Food and Beverage Industry. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 28, 58. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/18004
Section
ESI Preprints