Analyzing the Impact of Corporate Hedging on Enterprise Valuation: Evidence from China
Abstract
In a dynamic global financial landscape marked by unprecedented turbulence, driven notably by the COVID-19 pandemic, corporate hedging practices emerged as a critical tool for managing risks and preserving enterprise value (EV). This research investigated the intricate relationship between corporate hedging and EV, with a specific focus on Chinese-listed firms spanning the period from 2012 to 2023. Employing an extensive sample of 4,574 Chinese-listed firms, the study leveraged the Generalized Least Squares (GLS) model for its empirical analysis. The findings revealed a statistically significant positive impact of corporate hedging on enterprise value, validating the hypothesis that effective risk management strategies contributed to increased firm valuation. Furthermore, the study introduced crucial moderating variables (enterprise ownership and corporate governance index) and uncovered their effects on the relationship between hedging practices and EV. State-owned enterprises and firms with stronger corporate governance mechanisms exhibited a more pronounced positive association between hedging and EV. Overall, this research advanced theoretical frameworks and provided practical insights for corporate leaders, investors, and policymakers navigating the complexities of risk management in a rapidly evolving economic landscape.
Downloads
Metrics
References
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-12-2018-0134
2. Campbell, J. L., Mauler, L. M., & Pierce, S. R. (2019). A review of derivatives research in accounting and suggestions for future work. Journal of Accounting Literature, 42(1), 44–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2019.02.001
3. Cardinale, R. (2021). State-Owned Enterprises’ reforms and their implications for the resilience and vulnerability of the Chinese economy: Evidence from the banking, energy and telecom sectors. Networks and Spatial Economics, 22(3), 489–514.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-021-09540-x
4. Dang, L. N., Nguyen, D. D., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). State-owned enterprise reform in Viet Nam: Progress and challenges. Reforming State-Owned Enterprises in Asia, 231–254.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8574-6_12
5. Grima, S., Thalassinos, E. I., & Gonzi, D. R. (2020). Financial derivatives: A blessing or a curse? Emerald Publishing.
6. Guay, W. R., & Kothari, S. P. (2001). How much do firms hedge with derivatives? SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.262544
7. Hull, J. C. (2022). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Pearson Education Limited.
8. Buriro, M. H., Bhatti, A. A. & Jamali, M. A. (2023). Capital expenditure, corporate hedging and firms’ value: Evidence from the oil and gas sector of Pakistan. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(2), 428-438.
https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-ii)38
9. Hendrati, M. I., Kusumawardhani, I. N., Asmara, K., Marseto, & Rusdiyanto. (2024). Strategy For Developing Planning For Post-Covid-19 SME Economic Recovery: Evidence From Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success, 25(199), 94–107.
https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.199.11
10. Landi, G. C., Iandolo, F., Renzi, A., & Rey, A. (2022). Embedding sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on Corporate Financial Risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 1096–1107.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2256
11. Merkert, R., & Swidan, H. (2019). Flying with(out) a safety net: Financial hedging in the airline industry. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 127, 206–219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.012
12. Milidonis, A., & Stathopoulos, K. (2014). Managerial incentives, risk aversion, and debt. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(2), 453–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109014000301
13. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, Corporation Finance and the theory of Investment. American Economic Review.
14. Tron, A. (2021). Corporate distress and financial equilibrium: Genesis and prognosis. Corporate Financial Distress, 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-980-220211002
15. Sridhar, S. (2023). An introduction to liquid exit derivatives enabling dynamic option pricing for private equity secondaries markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4474915
16. Su, K., Zhang, M., & Liu, C. (2022). Financial derivatives, analyst forecasts, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 81, 101671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101671
17. Sugiarto, H., Yanti, J., Cahyani, D., Junaidi, A., & Oktoriza, L. A. (2023). Exploration Financial Performance Optimization Strategies on Business Success: A Literature Review. Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 402-411.
https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v6i2.4958
18. Xiang, F. (2022). Financial derivatives: Application and risk management. Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2022), 890–895. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_131
19. Xie, D., Shi, X., Liu, J., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Free cash flow productivity among Chinese listed companies: A Comparative Study of soes and non-soes. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4529406
20. Yang, A., Li, W., Teo, B. S., & Othman, J. (2022). The impact of financial derivatives on the enterprise value of Chinese listed companies: Moderating effects of managerial characteristics. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(1), 2.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11010002
Copyright (c) 2024 Bobur Nasriddinov, Sinbad Kurbonov, Kessellie Traore Mulbah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
