E-training environment for developing Capstone teaching skills for STEM teachers in Egypt
Abstract
The research investigated the efficacy of utilizing an e-training environment to enhance capstone teaching skills among STEM educators. Conducted at Obour STEM School, Cairo, Egypt, the study employed a quasi-experimental design with 27 randomly selected participants. Three instruments were utilized: a list of Capstone teaching skills, a pre-post achievement test, and an observation card assessing skill acquisition in two main fields: EDP Field and Process Management Field. These fields encompassed eight main skills, subdivided into 64 subskills. The researchers conducted pre- and post-testing, initially administering a 70-question pre-test followed by a month-long online training via Microsoft Teams. The training content aimed to address identified needs based on pre-test results. After the training, participants completed a post-test, which was repeated after another month. Results indicated a statistically significant difference (p<=0.05) between pre-test and post-achievement test scores, favoring the latter, suggesting improvement in Capstone teaching skills. Similarly, there was a significant difference (p<=0.05) between pre-test and post-observation card scores, indicating enhanced skill development. Conclusively, the study demonstrated the effectiveness of e-training, particularly employing the SOLE technique, in enhancing capstone teaching skills among STEM educators. Consequently, the researchers recommended the integration of e-training environments in STEM teacher development programs in Egypt.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Abu Khatwa, E. (2010) The Role of E-Learning in Enhancing Knowledge Communities. at the Zain Center for E-Learning - University of Bahrain, during the period from 6-8 April 2010.
3. Alizadeh, A., Arun, S., & Wong, A. (2021). Exploring factors influencing acceptance of e-training in the workplace. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
4. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Anderson, T. (2008). Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
6. Artino, A., & Ioannou, A. (2008). Promoting Academic Motivation and Self-Regulation: Practical Guidelines for Online Instructors. TechTrends, 52, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0153-x.
7. Aslam, F., Adefila, A., & Bagiya, Y. (2018). STEM outreach activities: an approach to teachers’ professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(1), 58–70.
8. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
11. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 123-152.
12. Brown, L., & Jones, M. (2018). The Role of Capstone Projects in Student Learning. Journal of Higher Education, 42(3), 275-289.
13. Brown, M., & Rutherford, D. (2016). Developing analytical skills in capstone courses. College Teaching, 64(1), 20-28.
14. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
15. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
16. Cheng, M., Zheng, Y., Li, W., & Li, T. (2023). The Effect of Learning Environment on the Effectiveness of Online Training: A Moderated Mediation Model. IEEE Access, 11, 5878-5887.
17. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
18. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
19. El-Zeftawy, S. M., & El Kordy, S. S. (2020). STEM Education in Egypt: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Educational Sciences, 32(4), 923-946.
20. Erdogan, I., Ciftci, A., Yıldırım, B., & Topcu, M. S. (2017, June). STEM Education Practices: Examination of the Argumentation Skills of Pre-service Science Teachers. Paper presented at the Journal of Education and Practice, ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online), Vol.8, No.25, 2017, 164.
21. Erdogan, N., Stuessy, C. L., & Park, H. (2017). STEM education and professional development to support 21st-century learning: Policy, practice, and partnerships. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(5), 613-630.
22. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23. Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service.
24. Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service.
25. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academies Press.
26. Jacquelyn,O. M. (2017). Getting started with Self-Organized Learning Environments. Retrieved July 12th , 2020, from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/getting-started-self-organized-learning-environments-jacquelyn-omalley
27. Johnson, A. (2015). Capstone Projects in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Guide. Boston: Pearson.
28. Jong, M. S. Y. (2019a). Sustaining the adoption of gamified outdoor social enquiry learning in high schools through addressing teachers’ emerging concerns: A three-year study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1275–1293.
29. Jong, M. S. Y. (2019b). To flip or not to flip: Social science faculty members’ concerns about flipping the classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 391–407.
30. Kahn, S., & Dell'Olio, J. A. (2019). Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide.
31. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1–11.
32. Khan, B. H. (2019). A review of e-learning in Canada: A complementary perspective. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 19-28.
33. Kim, M., Kwon, Y., & Kang, M. (2023). The impact of learning environments on user satisfaction and continuous use intention in mobile learning systems: Moderating effects of user characteristics. Computers & Education, 188, 104091.
34. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Designing for mobile and wireless learning. In M. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 180-192). Routledge.
35. Kwon, H., & Kim, J. (2014). Enhancing problem-solving and decision-making skills through capstone design projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6), 1511-1519.
36. Lee, N., & Loton, D. (2019). Capstone purposes across disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 44, 134 - 150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1347155.
37. Li, Y., Liu, X., Steckelberg, A. L., & Assareh, H. (2010). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553- 560.
38. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2, 43-71.
39. Meng, C. C., Idris, N., & Eu, L. K. (2014). Secondary students' perceptions of assessments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 219-227.
40. Mesidor, J. K., & Anderson, T. A. (2022). Examining the Relationship Between E-Training Acceptance and Employee Performance in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(1), 239-255.
41. Microsoft. (2024). Microsoft Teams. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/group-chat-software
42. Morrison, J. (2006, August). Attributes of STEM education. TIES STEM education monograph series. Baltimore, MD: Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM.
43. Morrison, J., & Bartlett, E. (2009). Integrating STEM education through project-based learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-12.
44. Moss. K. and. Shafer. S. (2010) Incorporating Active Learning Theory into Activity Routines, http://www.tsbvi.edu/seehear/winter06/learning.htm.
45. National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2024). Capstone Projects. Retrieved from https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/capstone-projects/]
46. National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM Workforce: A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. National Science Foundation.
47. Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207-216.
48. Seiferth, B., Moore, K., Simmonds, A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2017). An investigation of the relationship between time management skills and the effectiveness of capstone research projects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 1-18.
49. Su, A. Y., & Osman, K. (2021). Exploring the Determinants of Continuance Intention to Use E-Training in Malaysian Public Sector. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), 12(1), 55-68.
50. Sugata Mitra: The child-driven education. TEDGlobal 2010. July 2013. Retrieved July 12, 2020
51. Swanson, C., McCulley, L. V., Osman, D. J., Scammacca Lewis, N., & Solis, M. (2015). Developing research skills in undergraduate capstone projects. College Teaching, 63(3), 116-124.
52. TEDGLOBAL. (OXFORDENGLAND). (2010). Self-Organized Learning Environment {Educational Video (video web cast)}. Available July 8th, 2020. From https://youtu.be/LEQc_NyAFXc?t=833
53. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (2021). What is a Capstone Project? Retrieved from https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/capstone-projects/
54. UNC-Chapel Hill. (2021). What is a Capstone Project? Retrieved from https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/capstone-projects/
55. UNC-Chapel Hill. (2023). What is a Capstone Project? Retrieved from https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/capstone-projects/]
56. University of Washington. (2020). What is a Capstone Project? Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/undergradresearch/students/get-started/what-is-a-capstone-project/
57. Wang, X., Liu, Y., Yang, C., & Cheng, M. (2019). Enhancing communication skills in engineering capstone projects through peer review and assessment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), 268-279.
58. Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J. C., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor, learner and observer perceptions of presence in online learning environments. Distance Education, 37(1), 90-109
Copyright (c) 2024 Noha Anbar, Tarek Hegazy, Mohamed El Naggar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.