Assessment of Health Professionals' Knowledge of Risk Factors in the Performance of Home Radiography

  • Panagiotis Bidikoudis Public Health Policy Department, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Konstantinos Athanasakis Public Health Policy Department, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Christos Michail Biomedical Engineering Department, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Georgios Farantos Public Health Policy Department, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Georgios Dounias Public Health Policy Department, University of West Attica, Greece
Keywords: Ionizing radiation, portable radiology unit, home care, occupational hazard, radiation protection

Abstract

Aim and purpose: The knowledge of health professionals about the potential risks of using ionizing radiation plays an important role in protecting themselves and patients. The use of mobile radiography units poses several threats to workers such as radiation exposure, ergonomic injuries and musculoskeletal disorders from the constant use of lead feet and moving the portable radiography machine. The aim of the study is to highlight the knowledge background of healthcare professionals on radiation and radiation protection. Methodology: 72 questionnaires were distributed and 60 were returned with an overall response rate of 83%. The main sections addressed through the questionnaire were demographic data, knowledge background on radiation dose and radiation protection rules and measures. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS software. Results: From the results, the deficit of the knowledge background of health professionals on radiation and radiation protection is evident. It emerged that health professionals, especially medical doctors - radiologists have knowledge of the dose received by the patient when performing a chest X-rayin a percentage of 75%, 6.6% stated that they rarely or never use a protective lead apron, 5% of the respondents stated that they never use a personal dosimeter. Conclusion: The guidelines for radiation protection of workers and patients when performing home radiography should be based on the pillars of continuous training of staff, but also on adherence to the very basic principle of justification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Frinkenzeller,T., Lenhart, S., Reinwald, M., Luth, S., Dendl, L.M., Paetzel, C., Zczypien, N., Klawonn, F., Von Meyer, A., Schreyer, A.G. (2021). Risk to radiology Staff for Occupational COVID- 19 Infection in a High- Risk and a Low- Risk Region in Germany : Lessons from the “First Wave”. PubMed, Epub, 193(5), 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1393-6668.
2. Yoshinaga, S., Mabushi, K., Sigurdson, A.J., Doody, MM., Ron, E.(2004). Cancer Risk among radiologic technologists: review of epidemiologic studies. Radiology, 233(2), 313-21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2332031119.
3. Siewert, B., Brook, O.R., Mullins, M.M., Eisenberg, R.L., Kruskal, J.(2013). Practice Policy and Quality Initiatives: Strategies for Optimizing Staff Safety in a Radiology Department. Radiographics, 33(1), 245-61. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.331125174.
4. Ashong, G.G.N.A., Rogers, H., Botwe, B.O., Anim-Sampong, S.(2016). Effects of occupational stress and coping mechanisms adopted by radiographers in Ghana. Radiography, 22(2), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.09.002.
5. Alhasan, M., Abdelrahman, M., Alewaidat, H., Almhdawi, K., Nazzal, M. (2014). Work-related stress, musculoskeletal disorder complaints, and stress symptoms among radiographers in the northern part of Jordan. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci,45(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2014.04.002.
6. Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., Yong,X., Li, J., Liu, J.(2020). Effects of Occupational Radiation Exposure on Job Stress and Job Burnout of Medical Staff in Xinjiang, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medical Science Monitor,26, e927848-1–e927848-13. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927848.
7. Valentin, J. (2007). ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the Internationals Commission on Radiological Protection . International Commission on Radiology Protection by ELSEVIER.ISSN 0146-6453. ISBN 2007.
8. European Society of Radiology. (2015). Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom : essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging, 6, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0410-4.
9. Mattews, K., Brennan, P.C. (2008). Justification of X- ray examinations: General principles and Irish perspective. Radiograph, 14(4), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2008.01.004.
10. Konstantarogianni, Ε. (2015). Investigation of the cognitive background and the attitudes of health professionals in areas with ionizing radiation. University of Peloponnese School of Human Movement and Quality of Life Sciences.
11. Koukouletsos, Α. (2020). Sensitization of doctors, nurses and radiology technologists on radiation protection issues in the unit of intensive care for newborns. University of Patras.
12. Shiralkar, S., Rennie, A., Snow, M., Galland, R.B., Lewis, M.H., Gower- Thomas, K. (2003). Doctor’s Knowledge of radiation exposure questionnaire study. BMJ, 16(327), 371-2.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7411.371.
13. al- Amassi, Muhammad A.J.(2015). Assessment of Health Risk from X-ray Radiation on Staff in Selected Gaza Strip Hospitals. The Islamic University – Gaza, BIM-612134.
Published
2024-08-08
How to Cite
Bidikoudis, P., Athanasakis, K., Michail, C., Farantos, G., & Dounias, G. (2024). Assessment of Health Professionals’ Knowledge of Risk Factors in the Performance of Home Radiography. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 32, 61. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/18424
Section
ESI Preprints

Most read articles by the same author(s)