Gender Issues, Social Equity, and the Sustainable Management of Urban Transport Networks: An Italian Case Study

Elisabetta Venezia

doi:10.19044/esj.2024.v20n23p1

Elisabetta Venezia University of Bari Aldo Moro, Department of Economics and Finance, Italy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n23p1

Keywords: Sustainable mobility, Gender issues, Random utility model, Willingness to pay, Policy recommendations

Abstract

The paper contains transport and environmental analyses for the Gallipoli area and presents results from a consultation process involving transport operators, citizens, tourists, public employees, and stakeholders. Through statistical analysis of the data, the paper provides insights into the needs of specific user categories, highlighting gender issues and social equity as key aspects of urban policies. This paper further investigates users’ potential willingness to pay for general improvements in bus service quality and environmental conditions using discrete choice modeling. This study aims to address the challenge of understanding urban travel patterns and the underlying forces influencing user attitudes, which are often found in city surveys. Specifically, a Random Utility Model was used to profile users based on specially collected survey data. The results indicate the potential to meet latent systemic transport demand with more sustainable collective transport modes, particularly among women aged 19-29 who own a car. Simultaneously, there is a willingness to pay higher public transport tariffs for improved service, which is also largely environmentally sustainable. The paper can serve as a valuable resource for professionals in the transport and environmental sectors as well as for policymakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Beebeejaun, Y. (2016). Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life, Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526
2. Cascetta, E. & Papola, A. (2001). Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand, Transportation Research, part C, vol. 9, issue 4, pages 249-263.
3. Elias, W., Newmark, G., & Shiftan, Y. (2008). Gender and travel behavior in two Arab communities in Israel. Transportation Research Record,: 75 – 83.
4. Gauvin, L., Tizzoni, M., Piaggesi, S., Young, A., Adler, N., Verhulst, S., & Cattuto, C. (2020). Gender gaps in urban mobility. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1-13.
5. Green, W.H. (1997). Econometric analysis, Prentice-Hall International, London.
6. Hanson, S. (2010). Gender and mobility: new approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690903498225
7. Hapke, H. & Ayyankeril, D. (2004). Gender, the work-life course, and livelihood strategies in a South Indian fish market. Gender, Place, and Culture, 11 ( 2 ): 229 – 56.
8. Hough, J., Cao, X., & Handy, S. (2008). Exploring travel behavior of elderly women in rural and small urban North Dakota. Transportation Research, 2082: 125 – 131.
9. Kern, L. (2005). In place and at home in the city: Connecting privilege, safety, and belonging for women in Toronto. Gender, Place, and Culture, 12 ( 3 ): 357 – 77.
10. Koskela, H. (1999). Gendered exclusions: Women's fear of violence and changing relations to space. Geografiska Annaler, 81B: 111 – 24.
11. Maddala, G.S. (1999). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Mandel, J. (2004). Mobility matters: Women's livelihood strategies in Porto Novo, Benin. Gender, Place, and Culture, 11 ( 2 ): 257 – 87.
13. Mijailović, R.M., Pešić, D., & Petrović, D. (2024). Exploring transportation equity issues for persons with disabilities: The impact of gender on mobility and accessibility indicators, Journal of Transport & Health, Volume 36, 101801, ISSN 2214-1405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101801.
14. Sagaris, L. & Tiznado-Aitken, I. (2023). New horizons for sustainable transport planning: An analysis of seven years of gender-related research in Chile, Journal of Transport & Health, Volume 28, 101544, ISSN 2214-1405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101544.
15. Srinivasan, S. (2008). A spatial exploration of the accessibility of low-income women: Chengdu, China and Chennai, India, in Gendered mobilities, Edited by: Cresswell, T. and Uteng, T.P. 143 – 58. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co.
16. Tanzarn, N. (2008). Gendered mobilities in developing countries: The case of (urban) Uganda, in Gendered mobilities, Edited by: Cresswell, T. and Uteng, T.P. 159 – 71. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
17. Tiznado_Aikten, I., Guerrero, B.T., & Sagaris, L. (2024). Uncovering gender-based violence and harassment in public transport: Lessons for spatial and transport justice, Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 114, 103766, ISSN 0966-6923, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103766.
18. Uteng, T.P. (2021). Chapter Two - Gender gaps in urban mobility and transport planning, Editor(s): Rafael H.M. Pereira, Geneviève Boisjoly, Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Academic Press, Volume 8, Pages 33-69, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2021.07.004.
19. Valentine, G. (1989). The geography of women's fear. Area, 21 ( 4 ): 385 – 90.
20. Venezia, E. (2015). “Environmental sustainable management of urban networks with the use of ICT: URBANETS project. The case of Gallipoli”, GRASPA Proceedings, 2015.
21. Wright, M. (2005). Paradoxes, protests, and the Mujeres de Negro of Northern Mexico. Gender, Place, and Culture, 12 ( 3 ): 277 – 92.