Driving Organizational Innovation in Public Healthcare: The Strategic Impact of Inclusive Leadership
Abstract
In the public sector, it is essential to prioritize innovation and adaptation to efficiently tackle intricate and ever-changing difficulties. The objective of this study is to analyze how inclusive leadership affects the innovative work behavior of employees in the public healthcare sector and to determine the function of public service motivation and leader-member exchange theory in regulating this relationship. To evaluate the study’s hypotheses, data was collected from a field study of 300 public healthcare workers. The data was gathered via structured surveys and analyzed using Hayes' technique with the help of Mplus. The testing was combined with bootstrapping to analyze mediation and moderation relationships in the study. The results show a strong and positive connection between inclusive leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior in the public healthcare sector. Furthermore, the variables of autonomy and competence played a mediating role in the connection between inclusive leadership and individual work behavior. The study also includes a rigorous investigation of its results, as well as an analysis of their implications, limitations, and recommendations for future research endeavors.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Almer, E. D., Cannon, N. H., & Kremin, J. (2023). The impact of supervisor relationships on auditor turnover intentions using leader-member exchange theory. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), 1-12.
3. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
4. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human performance, 25(1), 1-25.
5. Bataineh, M. S. E., Zainal, S. R. M., Muthuveloo, R., Yasin, R., Al Wali, J., & Mugableh, M. I. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance: The role of innovative work behaviour. Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 17(1).
6. Da Ye Lee, & Jo, Y. (2023). The job demands-resource model and performance: the mediating role of employee engagement. Frontiers of Psychology. 2023, 14.
7. Fang, Y. C., Chen, J. Y., Wang, M. J., & Chen, C. Y. (2019). The impact of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behaviors: the mediation of psychological capital. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1803.
8. Gong, L., Liu, Z., Rong, Y., & Fu, L. (2021). Inclusive leadership, ambidextrous innovation, and organizational performance: the moderating role of environment uncertainty. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(5), 783-801.
9. Gupta, S., Nawaz, N., Tripathi, A., Arif Chaudhry, S., & Agrawal, K. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovation performance during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: Mediating role of employee innovation behavior and moderating role of psychological empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 811330.
10. Guo, Y., Jin, J., & Yim, S. H. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The mediating role of job crafting. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 4.
11. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(4), 554-571.
12. Javed, B., Fatima, T., Khan, A. K., & Bashir, S. (2021). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of creative self‐efficacy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 769-782.
13. Zhong, J., Li, Y., & Luo, J. (2022). The trickle-down effects of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: the joint moderating effects of vicarious learning and organizational inclusion climate. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 29(3), 342-358.
14. Ke, J., Zhang, J., & Zheng, L. (2022). Inclusive leadership, workplace spirituality, and job performance in the public sector: A multi-level double-moderated mediation model of leader-member exchange and perceived dissimilarity. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(3), 672-705.
15. Kaya, B., & Karatepe, O. M. (2020). Does servant leadership better explain work engagement, career satisfaction and adaptive performance than authentic leadership? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2075-2095.
16. Lambriex-Schmitz, P., Van der Klink, M. R., Beausaert, S., Bijker, M., & Segers, M. (2020). Towards successful innovations in education: Development and validation of a multi-dimensional Innovative Work Behaviour Instrument. Vocations and Learning, 13, 313-340.
17. Li, C., Makhdoom, H. U. R., & Asim, S. (2020). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovative work behavior: Examining mediation and moderation mechanisms. Psychology research and behavior management, 105-118.
18. Lifton, P. D. (1983). Measures of autonomy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(5), 514-523.
19. Mahardhani, A. J. (2023). The role of public policy in fostering technological innovation and sustainability. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 47-53.
20. Mansoor, A., Farrukh, M., Wu, Y., & Abdul Wahab, S. (2021). Does inclusive leadership incite innovative work behavior? Human Systems Management, 40(1), 93-102.
21. Tasova, M., Pehlivanoglu, M. Ç., & Civelek, M. E. (2023). The role of perceived organizational support and work engagement on the relationship between leader-member exchange and job satisfaction. Dogus Universitesi Dergisi, 24(2), 153-169.
22. Bataineh, M. S. E., Zainal, S. R. M., Muthuveloo, R., Yasin, R., Al Wali, J., & Mugableh, M. I. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance: The role of innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management (IJBSAM), 17(1), 28-43.
23. Saleem, T., Shahab, H., & Irshad, M. (2023). High-performance work system and innovative work behavior: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of inclusive leadership. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 8(1), 43-59.
24. Schott, C.; Neumann, O.; Baertschi, M.; Ritz, A.; Public Service Motivation, Prosocial Motivation and Altruism: Towards Disentanglement and Conceptual Clarity. International Journal of Public Administration, 2019. ; DOI:10.1080//01900692.2019.1588302
25. Wang, C.J.; Yang, I.H.; Why and How Does Empowering Leadership Promote Proactive Work Behavior? An Examination with a Serial Mediation Model among Hotel Employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(5).; DOI:10.3390/ijerph18052386
26. Qi, L., Liu, B., Wei, X., & Hu, Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: Perceived organizational support as a mediator. PloS one, 14(2), e0212091.
27. Qurrahtulain, K., Bashir, T., Hussain, I., Ahmed, S., & Nisar, A. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance with the mediation of vigor at work and moderation of internal locus of control. Journal of public affairs, 22(1), e2380.
28. Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., & Ting, H. (2023). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & Quantity, 57(Suppl 4), 707-721.
29. Siyal, S., Xin, C., Umrani, W. A., Fatima, S., & Pal, D. (2021). How do leaders influence innovation and creativity in employees? The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Administration & Society, 53(9), 1337-1361.
30. Surucu, L., Maslakci, A., & Sesen, H. (2023). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviors: A moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 87-102.
31. Tian, G., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Linking empowering leadership to employee innovation: The mediating role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(10), 1-8.
32. Tung, F. C., & Yu, T. W. (2016). Does innovation leadership enhance creativity in high-tech industries?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(5), 579-592.
33. Wang, H., Chen, M., & Li, X. (2021). Moderating multiple mediation model of the impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 666477.
34. Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal, 37(4), 468-480.
35. Zahari, N. (2023). Transformational leadership style and talent management practices in improving employee engagement in the Malaysian public sector: the mediating role of public service motivation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
36. Zhang, J., Zhang, F., & Zainal, S. R. B. M. (2023). Inclusive leadership and employee innovative behavior: moderated by creative self-efficacy. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 1346-1362.
37. Zhang, Q., Abdullah, A., Hossan, D., & Hou, Z. (2021). The effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior with moderating role of internal locus of control and psychological empowerment. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1267-1276.
38. Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., & Darko, A. (2018). How does transformational leadership promote innovation in construction? The mediating role of innovation climate and the multilevel moderation role of project requirements. Sustainability, 10(5), 1506.
39. Zhong, J., Li, Y., & Luo, J. (2022). The trickle-down effects of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: the joint moderating effects of vicarious learning and organizational inclusion climate. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 29(3), 342-358.
40. Zhou, F., & Wu, Y. J. (2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader-employee interaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 375-387.
Copyright (c) 2024 Saba Feroz Qureshi, Khawaja Asif Tasneem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.