Class, Power, and Social Change: A New Historicist Approach to August Strindberg’s Miss Julie and Anton Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard
Abstract
This paper conducts a new historicist analysis of Strindberg’s Miss Julie (2008) and Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard (1951), exploring how these plays reflect and respond to the social, political, and cultural dynamics of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. By examining the interaction between literature and history, this study reveals how these works depict the tensions between old and new social orders, the shift of power dynamics, and the struggles of individuals caught in the midst of profound societal changes. Although both classic works have been the subject of a lot of critical studies, neither has been studied from a new historicist perspective. The shift in power dynamics at the very beginning of the twentieth century with the deterioration of the aristocratic sovereignty and the rise of the middle class is a prominent theme in both plays. This shift conveys the inevitability of change that disrupts routines, norms, and tradition. From a new historicist perspective, those who are marginalized do not necessarily match readers’ initial assumptions, as the measures used to exhume the stigmatized characters are never the same as those utilized in other theoretical frameworks. It is not a battle between two antagonistic groups; nor is it a Greek tragedy that instigates catharsis upon the heroes’ tragic falls, simply because there is no hero, only an antihero. While Strindberg focuses on the changing role of women and the emergence of feminism in addition to class struggle, a new historicist approach reads these radical social, political, and economic changes as a result of historical changes taking place in Europe during that era. Chekhov, in turn, depicts the historical fall of aristocrats who had started to lose power on behalf of wild capitalism during the same era.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Chekhov, A. (1951). The cherry orchard. Penguin Books.
3. Davari, H., & Sadeghi, M. (2017). The dialectical reading of Strindberg's Miss Julie. Journal of Humanistic & Social Studies, 8(2), 57. ISSN 2067-7557.
4. Eagleton, T. (2002). Marxism and literary criticism. Routledge.
5. Foucault, M. (1977). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
6. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
7. Foucault, M. (2005). The order of things. Routledge.
8. Frykman, J., & Löfgren, O. (2003). Culture builders: A historical anthropology of middle-class life. Rutgers University Press.
9. Gallagher, C., & Greenblatt, S. (2000). Practicing new historicism. University of Chicago Press.
10. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
11. Goldberg, J. (1985). James I and the politics of literature. Renaissance Quarterly, 38, 180-183.
12. Greenblatt, S. (1992). Marvelous possessions: The wonder of the New World. Oxford University Press.
13. Greenblatt, S. J. (1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press.
14. Hart, J. (1991). New historicism: Taking history into account. ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 22(1), January 1991.
15. Hirdmann, Y. (1996). Key concepts in feminist theory: Analysing gender and welfare (FREIA's tekstserie No. 34). Department of History, International and Social Studies, Aalborg University. https://doi.org/10.5278/freia.14136339
16. Hosking, G. (2011). Russia and the Russians: A history. Harvard University Press.
17. Lemert, C. C. (2015). Postmodernism is not what you think: Theory, ideology, and the new pragmatism. Taylor & Francis.
18. Magarshack, D. (1952). Chekhov, the dramatist. Secker & Warburg.
19. Middeke, M., Muller, W., Wald, C., & Zapf, H. (2012). English and American studies: Theory and practice. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00406-2
20. Montrose, L. (1989). Professing the Renaissance: The poetics and politics of culture. In H. A. Veeser (Ed.), The new historicism (pp. 15-36). Routledge.
21. Norrby, G. (2008). Nobility under transformation: Noble strategies and identities in nineteenth century Sweden. In C. Hakansson (Ed.), Noble Strategies: Nobility and Culture in Sweden, 1500-1900 (pp. 235-250). Nordic Academic Press.
22. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2024, February 19). Israel/oPt: UN experts appalled by reported human rights violations against Palestinian women and girls. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/02/israelopt-un-experts-appalled-reported-human-rights-violations-against
23. Robinson, M. (1998). Studies in Strindberg. London: Ubiquity Press.
24. Strindberg, A. (2008). Miss Julie and other plays (M. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
25. Therborn, G. (1983). Why some classes are more successful than others. New Left Review, 138, 37-55.
Copyright (c) 2024 Salam el Baba, Lutfi Hamadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.