The Role of Individual Performance in the Effect of ICT Appropriation on Educational Performance of Students in Public Universities in the Casablanca-Settat Region, Morocco
Keywords:
The Use of ICT in Education, Appropriation of ICT in Education, Educational Performance, University Students, Moroccan Context
Abstract
Over the past two decades, Moroccan higher education institutions have significantly invested in information and communication technologies (ICT). The integration of ICT in education (ICTE) and learning has led to major changes, including the implementation of digital strategies and programs that have enriched the educational system. Notable progress has been made, such as providing most institutions with computer equipment and expanded internet access, especially in universities. Despite these advancements, questions remain about the true impact of these technologies on student performance and the overall effectiveness of the educational system. While researchers have explored this issue both theoretically and empirically, they face challenges, including the complex observation of students' individual performance and the rapid evolution of ICT, which makes isolating their effects difficult. This study aims to examine the impact of students' appropriation of ICT on educational performance in public universities in the Casablanca-Settat region and to explore the role of individual performance in this relationship. Using structural equation modeling (SEM) with SMART PLS 4.0 software, data from 185 students revealed a significant positive relationship between ICT appropriation and educational performance, with individual performance serving as a mediator. By employing mediation analysis, as outlined by Baron and Kenny (1986) and MacKinnon et al. (2007, 2012), the study investigated how individual performance mediates the relationship between ICT appropriation and educational performance. This method enabled the identification of both direct and indirect effects, providing a more nuanced understanding of the mechanisms through which ICT impacts educational outcomes via individual performance. The findings suggest that ICT is a crucial factor in improving higher education performance and highlight the importance of platform quality and students' sense of self-determination in the effective integration of ICT in the educational process. Future research should continue to explore individual performance among Moroccan university students and its impact on educational outcomes.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
PlumX Statistics
References
1. Adel Ben Youssef, Mounir Dahmani. (2008). The Impact of ICT on Student Performance in Higher Education: Direct Effects, Indirect Effects and Organisational Change. RUSC: Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 5 (1), pp.45-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v5i1.321
2. Aicha Abdel‐Ouahed, (2014). Reflection about integrating ICT in teaching and learning of French: the case of Moroccan universities. frantice.net, numéro 8. http://www.frantice.net/docannexe/fichier/921/9.OUAHED.pdf
3. Alieto, E., Abequibel-Encarnacion, B., Estigoy, E., Balasa, K., Eijansantos, A., & Torres-Toukoumidis, A. (2024). Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines. Heliyon, 10(2), e24282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24282
4. Alex Murray, Jen Rhymer, Gavid G. (2021). Humans and technology: forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of management review. vol. 46, no. 3, 552–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0186
5. Al-Rahmi, Waleed Mugahed, Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, Qusay Al-Maatouk, Mohd Shahizan Othman, Anas Ratib Alsaud, Abeer S. Almogren, and Ali Mugahed Al-Rahmi. (2023). Integrating Communication and Task–Technology Fit Theories: The Adoption of Digital Media in Learning. Sustainability 15, no. 10: 8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108144
6. Almufarreh, Ahmad, and Muhammad Arshad. (2023). Promising Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Recent Developments and Future Challenges. Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086917
7. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665-694. DOI:10.2307/3250951
8. Amine , H., Noureddine , E., Jalal , K., Lotfi , A., & Khalid , E. (2024). Is It Necessary to Use Digital Tools in the Flipped Classroom to Improve the Memorization Process?. International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), 653–672. Retrieved from https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/538
9. Andersén, J. and Kask, J. (2012). Asymmetrically realized absorptive capacity and relationship durability. Management Decision, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211194868
10. Anuragini Shirish, Nina Verstraete, Olfa Chourabi. (2023). The impact of ICT characteristics on students’ learning outcomes during COVID-19 lockdown period: the crucial role of techno eustress perception. Human Systems Management, 42 (2), pp.149-162. 10.3233/HSM-220059. hal-03752991. DOI: 10.3233/HSM-220059
11. Asad, M.M., Erum, D., Churi, P.P., & Guerrero, A.J. (2023). Effect of technostress on Psychological well-being of post-graduate students: A perspective and correlational study of Higher Education Management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, 3, 100149. DOI:10.1016/J.JJIMEI.2022.100149
12. AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Saleh, S. and Alshraifin, N. (2024). Evaluation of STEM-Aligned Teaching Practices for Gifted Mathematics Teachers. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14625
13. Astin, A. W. (1985). Involvement the Cornerstone of Excellence. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 17(4), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1985.9940532
14. Agonhossou D.K. et Godonou C.K. (2011). Implication organisationnelle et performance au travail chez les infirmières et infirmiers diplômés d'état au Bénin. Management Prospective Ed. « Management & Avenir », 10(50). pp. 105-121. DOI 10.3917/mav.050.0105
15. Anoop Pandey, Mehak Mittal, Kamal Ahmad, Vaibhav Sharma. (2023). New Age Teaching Pedagogy: Innovative Teaching Methods and their Impact on Educational Performance of the Students. Online ISBN: 9781119867647, Print ISBN: 9781119867586, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119867647.ch4
16. B Charlot, E Bautier, JY Rochex. (1992). Ecole et savoir dans les banlieues... et ailleurs. Revue française de sociologie . 34-4 , pp. 690-693.
https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1993_num_34_4_4297
17. Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995
18. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
19. Basri, W. S., Alandejani, J. A., & Almadani, F. M. (2018). ICT Adoption Impact on Students’ Academic Performance: Evidence from Saudi Universities. Education Research International, 2018, Article ID: 1240197. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1240197
20. Ben Youssef, Adel, Mounir Dahmani, and Ludovic Ragni. 2022. "ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide" Information 13, no. 3: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
21. Becker, H. J. (1994). How Exemplary Computer-Using Teachers Differ From Other Teachers: Implications for Realizing the Potential of Computers in Schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1994.10782093
22. Becker, W. C. (1991). Toward an integration of behavioural and cognitive psychologies through instructional technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2273
23. Becker, H.J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report No. 1). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150927709
24. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 51. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n51.2000
25. Ben Youssef, Adel, Mounir Dahmani, and Ludovic Ragni. (2022). "ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide" Information 13, no. 3: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
26. Berg, Susan; Benz, Carolyn; Lasley, Tom; Raisch, Dan. (1997). The Coordinators and the Teachers: A Description of Exemplary Use of Technology in Elementary Classrooms.ERIC. ERIC Number: ED414877. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED414877
27. Burnett, J. R., & Lisk, T. C. (2021). The future of employee engagement: Real-time monitoring and digital tools for engaging a workforce. In M. Segalla (Ed.), International perspectives on employee engagement (pp. 117–128). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142492-9
28. Blanchard, C., Pelletier, L., Otis, N. & Sharp, E. (2004). Rôle de l’autodétermination et des aptitudes scolaires dans la prédiction des absences scolaires et l’intention de décrocher. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.7202/011772ar
29. Brault-Labbé, A., & Dubé, L. (2010). Engagement scolaire, bien-être personnel et autodétermination chez des étudiants à l’université [School engagement, personal well-being and self-determination in university students]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 42(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017385
30. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
31. Boufarouj, C. et Mdarbi, S. (2022). Appropriation des TICE et performance éducative des enseignants du supérieur : Cas des universités publiques de la région Casablanca - Settat. Revue de Management et Cultures, 7, pp. 366-381. https://doi.org/10.48430/IMIST.PRSM/remac-n7.34245
32. Beck, L. A. (1992). Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969876
33. Biagi F., Loi M. (2013). Measuring ICT Use and Learning Outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp. 28-42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejed.12016
34. Cabellos, B., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2024). The moderating role of school facilitating conditions and attitudes towards ICT on teachers’ ICT use and emphasis on developing students’ digital skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107994
35. Calderón, A., Meroño, L., & MacPhail, A. (2020). A student-centred digital technology approach: The relationship between intrinsic motivation, learning climate and academic achievement of physical education pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19850852
36. Cécile Kindelbeger, Claire Safont-Mottay. (2023). Trajectoires d’élaboration d’un projet vocationnel au cours du lycée : interrelations avec les processus identitaires, la motivation et les indicateurs de décrochage scolaire. L'Orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 52/2, pp.307-339. 10.4000/osp.17450. hal-04350841
37. Chang, CS., Chung, CH. & Chang, J.A. (2020). Influence of problem-based learning games on effective computer programming learning in higher education. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 2615–2634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09784-3
38. Chen, MJ., She, HC. & Tsai, PY. (2024). The effects of online simulation-based collaborative problem-solving on students’ problem-solving, communication and collaboration attitudes. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12609-y
39. Cheng, C. C., & Carolyn Yang, Y. T. (2023). Impact of smart classrooms combined with student-centered pedagogies on rural students’ learning outcomes: Pedagogy and duration as moderator variables. Computers and Education, 207, Article 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104911
40. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F., (1987). Appendix A: Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. (47):63 - 69. DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219914708
41. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 29
42. Chordia, I., Yip, J.C., & Hiniker, A. (2019). Intentional Technology Use in Early Childhood Education. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1 - 22. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:207957080
43. Csernoch, M., Biró, P., Máth, J. and Abari, K. (2015) Testing Algorithmic Skills in Traditional and Non-Traditional Programming Environments. Informatics in Education, 14, 175-197. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2015.11
44. Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 53(8):p 856-866. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
45. David, L., Weinstein, N. (2024). Using technology to make learning fun: technology use is best made fun and challenging to optimize intrinsic motivation and engagement. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 1441–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00734-0
46. De Juana-Espinosa, Susana Amalia, Brotons Matilde. (2023). An Analysis of Best Practices to Enhance Higher Education Teaching Staff Digital and Multimedia Skills.Human Systems Management, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 193-207, DOI: 10.3233/HSM-220060
47. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104 01
48. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431–441). University of Rochester Press.
49. Diego Fernando Fernando Barragan, Juan Carlos Amador Báquiro. (2020). Appropriation of ICT in the educational field: approach to public policy in Colombia years 2000-2019. Digital Education Review. Number 37. http://greav.ub.edu/der/
50. Deniger, M. A. (2004). La plénière sur la réussite éducative. Synthèse de la clôture. Tous ensemble pour la réussite. Colloque sur la collaboration recherche-intervention en réussite éducative. CTREQ.
51. Dr, S. Puranik. (2020). Innovative Teaching Methods in Higher Education. BSSS Journal of Education. Vol. IX, Issue-I. ISSN:2582-4872. https://doi.org/10.51767/je0907
52. Dimkêeg Sompassaté Parfait Kabore. (2021). L'intégration pédagogique des TIC dans l'enseignement supérieur au Burkina Faso : accessibilité, usages et appropriation par les étudiants. Education. Université de Strasbourg; Université de Koudougou. Français. (NNT : 2021STRAG005).
53. Edward Nketiah-Amponsah, Moses Kumi Asamoah, William Allassani, Lawrence Kwami Aziale. (2017). Examining students’ experience with the use of some selected ICT devices and applications for learning and their effect on academic performance. J. Comput. Educ. 4, 441–460 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0089-2
54. Ertmer P.A. et al. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers : Perceptions of factors influencing success. ISTE, pp. 55-61. URL : https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876918.pdf
55. Ferrero, A. M., & Álvarez Sainz, M. (2024). Attitudes of university students towards traditional face-to-face learning systems and learning with ICT. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(2), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156185
56. Fernández Cárdenas, Juan Manuel. (2004). The appropriation and mastery of cultural tools in computer supported collaborative literacy practices. PhD thesis The Open University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.0000d561
57. Fernandes, V. (2012). En quoi l’approche PLS est-elle une méthode a (re)-découvrir pour les chercheurs en management? M@N@ Gement, 15, 102-123. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.151.0102
58. Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
59. Fonseca Montoya, S., Fernández Rodríguez , M. M., & Maino Isaías , A. (2024). Prácticas Educativas Innovadoras Mediadas por las TIC: Impacto en la Calidad del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje. Sinergias Educativas, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.37954/se.v9i2.440
60. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.5(2), 295-336
61. François Mangenot. (2000). L'intégration des TIC dans une perspective systémique. Langues Modernes, Les nouveaux dispositifs d'apprentissage des langues vivantes, 3 / 2000, pp.38-44. hal-02045268
62. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.management, 15(1), 102-123. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/344
63. Ganiyu, R. S., Olasedidun, O. K., & Femi-Adeoye, K. O. (2024). Curriculum Reform in the Digital Age: Exploring the Role of ICT in Enhancing Teaching and Learning. Journal of Library, Science Education and Learning Technology (JOLSELT), (5)1, 14-23.
64. Gartzia-Rivero, Leire and Sánchez-Carnerero, Esther M. and Jiménez, Josue and Bañuelos, Jorge and Moreno, Florencio and Maroto, Beatriz L. and López-Arbeloa, Iñigo and de la Moya, Santiago. (2017). Modulation of ICT probability in bi(polyarene)-based O-BODIPYs: towards the development of low-cost bright arene-BODIPY dyads. Dalton Trans. V 46, issue: 35, p: 11830-11839. doi: 10.1039/C7DT01984J.
65. George D. Kuh & Shouping Hu. (2001). Learning Productivity at Research Universities, The Journal of Higher Education, 72:1, 1-28, DOI:10.1080/00221546.2001.11778862
66. Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). Editor's comments : an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS quarterly, iii-xiv
67. Hanaysha, J.R., Shriedeh, F.B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, 3, 100188
68. Hamzi Kheir Eddine Yassine, Benmarouf Mohamed Nabil, Bentaieb Samia. (2024). Optimisation des Ressources Énergétiques grâce à la Prédiction de la Consommation Électrique : Approche Analytique et Prédictive basée sur l'Intelligence Artificielle.
69. Hanieh Shafiee Rad, Javad Alipour, Aliakbar Jafarpour, Mahmood Hashemian. (2024). Unlocking the magic of digital adaptivity: Unleashing students' writing skills and self-determination motivation through digital literacy instruction, System, Volume 125, 103454, ISSN 0346-251X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103454
70. Heather Kirkpatrick and Larry Cuban. (1998). Computers Make Kids Smarter—Right?. TECHNOS QUARTERLY. Vol. 7 No. 2. https://dailypapert.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/TECHNOS-Cuban.pdf
71. Heath, M.K., Gleason, B., Mehta, R., Hall., T, (2023). More than knowing: toward collective, critical, and ecological approaches in educational technology research. Education Tech Research Dev . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10242-z
72. Hetmańczyk, P. (2024). Digitalization and its impact on labour market and education. Selected aspects. Educ Inf Technol 29, 11119–11134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12203-8
73. Hontarenko, I., & Kovalenko, O. (2024). Enhancing Teaching: The Crucial Role of Effective Preparation and Delivery of Lectures. Educational Challenges, 29(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.05
74. Hooker, M. (1997). The transformation of higher education. In Diane Oblinger and Sean C. Rush (Eds.). http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/seminars/Hooker.html
75. Idowu Sulaimon Adeniyi, Nancy Mohd Al Hamad, Ololade Elizabeth Adewusi, Chika Chioma Unachukwu, Blessing Osawaru, Chisom Nneamaka Onyebuchi, Samuel Ayodeji Omolawal, Aderonke Omotayo Aliu and Isiah Oden David. (2024). Educational reforms and their impact on student performance: A review in African. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(02), 750–762. DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0490
76. Ioannou, A., Lycett, M. & Marshan, A. (2024). The Role of Mindfulness in Mitigating the Negative Consequences of Technostress. Inf Syst Front 26, 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10239-0
77. Johnstone, D.B. (1993). Learning Productivity: A New Imperative for American Higher Education. Studies in Public Higher Education Number 3.https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:155567164. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED357721
78. Joshua Angrist, Victor Lavy. (2002). New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning, The Economic Journal, Volume 112, Issue 482, Pages 735–765, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00068
79. Kapo, A., Milutinovic, L.D., Rakovic, L. et Maric, S. (2024). Enhancing e-learning effectiveness: analyzing extrinsic and intrinsic factors influencing students’ use, learning, and performance in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 29, 10249–10276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12224-3
80. Kimuya, C., Kimani, G., & Mwaura, J. (2021). Relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ enhancement of ict in teaching and learning strategy and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in nairobi city county, kenya. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(6). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i6.3830
81. King, Laura; Jorgensen, Mary; Lussier, Alex; Fichten, Catherine; Havel, Alice; Amsel, Rhonda; Poldma, Tiiu; Budd, Jillian; Jorgensen, Shirley; Marcil, Evelyne; Nguyen, Mai Nhu; Chauvin, Alexandre; Asuncion, Jennison. (2017). Student and professor perspectives on exemplary practices in the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and e-learning in colleges. Modified version of report for the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture (FRQSC) and the ministère de l'Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur (MEES). Montréal, Québec : Réseau de Recherche Adaptech.
82. Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the Potential Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Academic Achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918
83. Ko E.J. et al. (2021). Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 171, pp. 1-12. DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120994
84. Koopmans, Linda MSc; Bernaards, Claire M. (2011). PhD; Hildebrandt, Vincent H. PhD; Schaufeli, Wilmar B. PhD; de Vet Henrica, C.W. PhD; van der Beek, Allard J. PhD.
85. Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., Rivera-Torres, P., Liesa-Orús, M. (2024). ICT efficacy and response to different needs in university classrooms: effects on attitudes and active behaviour towards technology. J Comput High Educ 36, 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09357-2
86. Lawrence C. Ragan, Thomas B. Cavanagh, Raymond Schroeder, Kelvin Thompson. (2023). Supporting Faculty Success in Online Learning: Requirements for Individual and Institutional Leadership. Leading the eLearning Transformation of Higher Education. 2nd Edition, p.22, eBook ISBN9781003445623. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003445623-10/supporting-faculty-success-online-learning-lawrence-ragan-thomas-cavanagh-raymond-schroeder-kelvin thompson
87. Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento-Márquez, E. M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2021). Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113
88. Lévy J., (2000). Les nouveaux espaces de la mobilité. In Bonnet M. et Des jeux D., Les territoires de la mobilité, Paris, PUF, coll. Sciences sociales et sociétés, p. 155-170. https://shs.cairn.info/article/PUF_BONNE_2000_01_0155?tab=premieres-lignes
89. Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld, Ann Bygholm, Geoffrey Olok Tabo. (2023). Transforming education through ICT: Exploring students' study practices in a resource-constrained university setting. British journal of educational technology. Volume 54, Issue 6, p. 1463-1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13367
90. Lukman, R., & Krajnc, M. (2012). Exploring Non-traditional Learning Methods in Virtual and Real-world Environments. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 237–247.
91. Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Evidence of a continuum structure of academic selfdetermination: A two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 67–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010
92. Lina Daouk, Muawya Aldalaien. (2019). The usage of E-learning instructional technologies in higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, ERIC. v18 n3 p97-109. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1223782
93. Magdalena Kania-Lundholm. (2023). Coping in the culture of connectivity: How older adults make sense of living with digital ageism. Digital Ageism. Routledge. 1st Edition, p. 18, EBook:ISBN9781003323686. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/63221/9781000904796.pdf?sequence=1#page=209
94. Margaret L. Hilton, Margaret A. Honey. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. National Academies Press. ISBN 0309212669, 9780309212663.
95. Margarita Núñez-Canal, M de las Mercedes de Obesso, Carlos Alberto Pérez-Rivero. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 174, ISSN 0040-1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270
96. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual review of psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
97. MacKinnon, D. P., Cheong, J., & Pirlott, A. G. (2012). Statistical mediation analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 313–331). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-018
98. Marshall Scott Poole, Michael Holmes, Gerardine Desanctis. (1991) Conflict Management in a Computer-Supported Meeting Environment. Management Science 37(8):926-953. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.8.926
99. Meza M. and C García. (2018). Use and appropriation of ICT in the educational practices of teachers of the program of environmental engineering of the Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1126, 012048: 1-6. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012048/meta
100. Munro, M.C., S.L. Huff, B.L. Marcolin et D.R. Compeau (1997), Understanding and measuring user competence, Information & Management, vol. 33, p. 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00035-9
101. Moses ekwufolu, .O. (2024). harnessing e-learning technologies for sustainable development of library and information science (lis) education in Nigeria. American Research Journal of Contemporary Issues, 2(1), 90-106. https://www.openjournals.ijaar.org/index.php/arjci/article/view/400
102. Nasirun, N., & Shahidan, A. N. (2024). Assessing the mediating role of student engagement on the relationship between student interactions and student performance in entrepreneurship education. Global Business Management Review (GBMR), 16(1), 83–97. Retrieved from. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/gbmr/article/view/24276
103. Nira Hativa, Rachel Barak & Etty Simhi. (2001). Exemplary University Teachers, The Journal of Higher Education, 72:6, 699-729. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2001.11777122
104. Ngoc Hoi, V. (2021). Augmenting student engagement through the use of social media: the role of knowledge sharing behaviour and knowledge sharing self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4021–4033. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1948871
105. Ní Shé, Caitríona, Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn, and Ciarán Mac an Bhaird. (2023). Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Resources in Mathematics in Higher Education: A Review. Mathematics 11, no. 3: 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787
106. Oguguo, B.C.E., Nannim, F.A., Agah, J.J., Ugwuanyi, C.S, Ene, C.U, Nzeadibe, A.C. (2021). Effect of learning management system on Student’s performance in educational measurement and evaluation. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10318-w
107. Osias Kit T. Kilag, Ghuen B. Segarra, Anna Mae L. De Gracia, Adones S. del Socorro, Cara Frances K. Abendan, Glennifer A. Camangyan, Eduard T. Mahasol. (2023). ICT application in teaching and learning. "Science and Education" Scientific Journal / Impact Factor 3,848 (SJIF)/ Volume 4 Issue 2. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ict-application-in-teaching-and-learning
108. Owan, Valentine Joseph and Asuquo, Michael Ekpenyong. (2021). Assessment of Socio-Demographic Factors and Students’ Satisfaction with the Study of ICT in Secondary Schools (July 17, 2021). Owan, V. J., & Asuquo, M. E. Assessment of socio-demographic factors and students’ satisfaction with the study of ICT in secondary schools. Pedagogical Research, 6(3), em0101. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11087, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3906934
109. O'Brien, H. L., Roll, I., Kampen, A., & Davoudi, N. (2022). Rethinking (dis)engagement in human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, Article 107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107109
110. Ou, W. A., & Gu, M. M. (2021). Competence beyond language: translanguaging and spatial repertoire in teacher-student interaction in a music classroom in an international Chinese University. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(8), 2741–2758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1949261
111. Pardo, A., & Román, M. (2013). Reflections on the Baron and Kenny model of statistical mediation. Anales de Psicología, 29(2), 614–623.
112. Parks, Amanda; Pisapia, John. (1994). Developing Exemplary Technology-Using Teachers. Research Brief #8. ERIC. ERIC Number: ED411360. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED411360
113. Perrenoud P. (2002). Les cycles d’apprentissage : Une autre organisation du travail pour combattre l'échec scolaire. ISBN : 9782760512085. DOI : 10.2307/j.ctv18ph5sx
114. Pelletier C. and Moreau M.F. (2008). L’appropriation des technologies de l’Internet et ses facteurs critiques de succès : un défi de plus pour les PME ?. Revue internationale P.M.E. : économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise 21 (2): 75-117. https://doi.org/10.7202/029432ar
115. Pierson M.E. (2001). Pratique d'intégration technologique en fonction de l'expertise pédagogique. Journal de recherche sur l'informatique dans l'éducation, 33 (4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
116. Paivandi S. (2018). Performance universitaire, apprentissage et temporalité des étudiants. Revue française de pédagogie, 202, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.7546
117. Qolamani, K., & Mohammed, M. M. (2023). The Digital Revolution in Higher Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 15(2), 837-846. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i2.3905
118. Raby C. (2004). Analyse du cheminement qui a mené des enseignants du primaire à développer une utilisation exemplaire des technologies de l’information et de la communication en classe. Education. Université de Montréal, pp. 1-459, Edutice-00000750
119. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer
120. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor's comments : a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in" MIS Quarterly". MIS quarterly, iii-xiv
121. Roux A. (2007). De l’usage à la pratique : les processus d’appropriation. Emprunts à la théorie de la structuration et empreinte du chercheur. Revue scientifique francophone en Communication organisationnelle, 34, pp. 124-139. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/communicationorganisation.168
122. Romuald Bodin, Mathias Millet. (2012). L’université, un espace de régulation. L’abandon dans les 1ers cycles à l’aune de la socialisation universitaire. Sociologie, 2 (11), pp.225-242. ff10.3917/socio.023.0225ff. ffhal-00983904f
123. Salim Ouahab. (2024). Effet de l’intégration didactico-pédagogique des Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication (TIC) sur la motivation et la performance des étudiants universitaires : Analyse des répercussions sur les compétences langagières en FLE. Ziglôbitha, Revue des Arts, Linguistique, Littérature & Civilisations.ISSN-L 2708-390X, eISSN 2709-2836. n°09 pp.537-556. https://www.ziglobitha.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/038-Art.-Salim-Ouahab-pp.537-556.pdf
124. Schroeder, Connie. (2010). Coming in from the Margins: Faculty Development's Emerging Organizational Development Role in Institutional Change. Routledge. ISBN 9781579223632
125. Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M.B. (1990). Accomplished Teachers: Integrating Computers into Classroom Practice. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151200086
126. Shahzad, Muhammad Farrukh, Xu, Shuo, Lim, Weng Marc, Yang, Xingbing, Khan, Qasim Raza. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Heliyon. Elsevier. 10 (8), doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523
127. Sharpe, Andrew. (2004). Ten Productivity Puzzles Facing Researchers. International Productivity Monitor, Number 9, Fall, pp. 15-24 (posted at www.csls.ca).
128. Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2020). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: the mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959
129. Scheerens, J. (2015). Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness: A Critical Review of the Knowledge Base.
130. Silva, J.C., Coelho Rodrigues, J. & Miguéis, V.L. (2024). Factors influencing the use of information and communication technologies by students for educational purposes. Educ Inf Technol 29, 9313–9353 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12132-6
131. Sigmen M. (2006). La performance dans l'enseignement supérieur : Vers une redéfinition de l'avantage concurrentiel - HEC Montréal.
132. Sun, H., Xie, Y., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Effects of the use of ICT in schools on students’ science higher-order thinking skills: comparative study of China and Finland. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(2), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2116421
133. Stumbrienė, D., Jevsikova, T. & Kontvainė, V. (2024). Key factors influencing teachers’ motivation to transfer technology-enabled educational innovation. Educ Inf Technol 29, 1697–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-6
134. Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research, 51(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880903354741
135. Sylvie St-Onge Michel Magnan, (2007). Chapitre 1. La gestion des performances des organisations et des personnes. Pages 15 à 52. DOI: 10.3917/dbu.onge.2007.01.0015
136. Srijamdee, K., Pholphirul, P. (2020). Does ICT familiarity always help promote educational outcomes? Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Educ Inf Technol 25, 2933–2970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10089-z
137. Tolani-Brown, N., McCormac, M., & Zimmermann, R. (2011). An Analysis of the Research and Impact of ICT in Education in Developing Country Contexts. In J. Steyn & G. Johanson (Eds.), ICTs and Sustainable Solutions for the Digital Divide: Theory and Perspectives (pp. 218-242). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-799-2.ch011
138. Turienzo, J. (2024). A transversal and practical education as a business success factor: literature review of learning process of basic design through ICT tools. Journal of Management and Business Education, 7(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2024.0005
139. Tularam, G.A., & Machisella, P. (2018). Traditional vs Non-traditional Teaching and Learning Strategies - the case of E-learning! International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
140. Tayseer Alnoaimi, J. Enrique Hinostroza, shafika Isaacs, Robert Kozma, Philip Wong. (2011). Using ICT policy to Transform Education. Transforming education: the power of ICT policies. ISBN : 978-92-3-104212-6. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000211842
141. Valverde-Berrocoso J, Acevedo-Borrega J and Cerezo-Pizarro M. (2022). Educational Technology and Student Performance: A Systematic Review. Front. Educ. 7:916502. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.916502
142. Van Dusen, Gerald C. (1997). The Virtual Campus: Technology and Reform in Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 25, No. 5.ISBN: ISBN-1-878380-77-X. ISSN: ISSN-0884-0040. p. 191. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed412816
143. Vithal, K.S.R. (2013). The relationship between academic performance and publication productivity of agricultural faculty members. Pearl A Journal of Library and Information Science, 7(4), pp. 237-242
144. Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Yidan, L., Yuhui Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
145. Watson, J. H. (2024). From Intention to Action: How Preservice Teachers Use Technology-Enabled Learning During Student Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241268577
146. Webster, J., & Ho, H. (1997). Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. Data Base, V 28, p. 63-77. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15845659
147. Wilson & Wilson. (2009). Digital Divide: Impediment to ICT and Peace Building in Developing Countries. American Communication Journal. Vol. 11, No. 2, https://ac-journal.org/journal/2009/Summer/5TheDigitalDivide.pdf
148. William H. DeLone, Ephraim R. McLean. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1):60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
149. Xu, S., Khan, K.I. & Shahzad, M.F. (2024). Examining the influence of technological self-efficacy, perceived trust, security, and electronic word of mouth on ICT usage in the education sector. Sci Rep 14, 16196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66689-4
150. Xiao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). Regression analysis of ICT impact factors on early adolescents’ reading proficiency in five high-performing countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01646
151. Xiaohua Zhai, Joan Puigcerver, Alexander Kolesnikov, Pierre Ruyssen, Carlos Riquelme, Mario Lucic, Josip Djolonga, Andre Susano Pinto, Maxim Neumann, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Olivier Bachem, Michael Tschannen, Marcin Michalski, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly, Neil Houlsby. (2019). A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. V2. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04867
152. Yildiz Çankaya, S. and Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0099
153. Yüceol, N. (2021). The Steps to be Taken in Higher Education for Successful Adaptation to Industry 4.0. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(3), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.617715
154. York, T.T., Gibson, C.W., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and Measuring Academic Success. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 20, 1-20.
155. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reconsiderer Baron et Kenny: mythes et verites a propos de l’analyse de mediation. Recherche et Applications En Marketing, 26(1), 81–95. doi:10.1177/076737011102600105
156. Zeng, J., Parks, S. E., & Shang, J. (2020). To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: a review of educational games. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.188
157. Zhang, Jing, Zengzhao Chen, Jingjing Ma, and Zhi Liu. (2021). Investigating the Influencing Factors of Teachers’ Information and Communications Technology-Integrated Teaching Behaviors toward “Learner-Centered” Reform Using Structural Equation Modeling. Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212614
158. Zhao, Chunkai & Chen, Boou, (2023). ICT in education can improve students’ achievements in rural China: The role of parents, educators and authorities. Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 320-344.
159. Zhou, C., Wu, D., Li, Y., Hao Yang. H, Man, S. & Min Chen, M. (2023). The role of student engagement in promoting teachers’ continuous learning of TPACK: based on a stimulus-organism-response framework and an integrative model of behavior prediction. Educ Inf Technol 28, 2207–2227 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11237-8
2. Aicha Abdel‐Ouahed, (2014). Reflection about integrating ICT in teaching and learning of French: the case of Moroccan universities. frantice.net, numéro 8. http://www.frantice.net/docannexe/fichier/921/9.OUAHED.pdf
3. Alieto, E., Abequibel-Encarnacion, B., Estigoy, E., Balasa, K., Eijansantos, A., & Torres-Toukoumidis, A. (2024). Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines. Heliyon, 10(2), e24282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24282
4. Alex Murray, Jen Rhymer, Gavid G. (2021). Humans and technology: forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of management review. vol. 46, no. 3, 552–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0186
5. Al-Rahmi, Waleed Mugahed, Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, Qusay Al-Maatouk, Mohd Shahizan Othman, Anas Ratib Alsaud, Abeer S. Almogren, and Ali Mugahed Al-Rahmi. (2023). Integrating Communication and Task–Technology Fit Theories: The Adoption of Digital Media in Learning. Sustainability 15, no. 10: 8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108144
6. Almufarreh, Ahmad, and Muhammad Arshad. (2023). Promising Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Recent Developments and Future Challenges. Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086917
7. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665-694. DOI:10.2307/3250951
8. Amine , H., Noureddine , E., Jalal , K., Lotfi , A., & Khalid , E. (2024). Is It Necessary to Use Digital Tools in the Flipped Classroom to Improve the Memorization Process?. International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), 653–672. Retrieved from https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/538
9. Andersén, J. and Kask, J. (2012). Asymmetrically realized absorptive capacity and relationship durability. Management Decision, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211194868
10. Anuragini Shirish, Nina Verstraete, Olfa Chourabi. (2023). The impact of ICT characteristics on students’ learning outcomes during COVID-19 lockdown period: the crucial role of techno eustress perception. Human Systems Management, 42 (2), pp.149-162. 10.3233/HSM-220059. hal-03752991. DOI: 10.3233/HSM-220059
11. Asad, M.M., Erum, D., Churi, P.P., & Guerrero, A.J. (2023). Effect of technostress on Psychological well-being of post-graduate students: A perspective and correlational study of Higher Education Management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, 3, 100149. DOI:10.1016/J.JJIMEI.2022.100149
12. AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Saleh, S. and Alshraifin, N. (2024). Evaluation of STEM-Aligned Teaching Practices for Gifted Mathematics Teachers. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14625
13. Astin, A. W. (1985). Involvement the Cornerstone of Excellence. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 17(4), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1985.9940532
14. Agonhossou D.K. et Godonou C.K. (2011). Implication organisationnelle et performance au travail chez les infirmières et infirmiers diplômés d'état au Bénin. Management Prospective Ed. « Management & Avenir », 10(50). pp. 105-121. DOI 10.3917/mav.050.0105
15. Anoop Pandey, Mehak Mittal, Kamal Ahmad, Vaibhav Sharma. (2023). New Age Teaching Pedagogy: Innovative Teaching Methods and their Impact on Educational Performance of the Students. Online ISBN: 9781119867647, Print ISBN: 9781119867586, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119867647.ch4
16. B Charlot, E Bautier, JY Rochex. (1992). Ecole et savoir dans les banlieues... et ailleurs. Revue française de sociologie . 34-4 , pp. 690-693.
https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1993_num_34_4_4297
17. Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995
18. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
19. Basri, W. S., Alandejani, J. A., & Almadani, F. M. (2018). ICT Adoption Impact on Students’ Academic Performance: Evidence from Saudi Universities. Education Research International, 2018, Article ID: 1240197. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1240197
20. Ben Youssef, Adel, Mounir Dahmani, and Ludovic Ragni. 2022. "ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide" Information 13, no. 3: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
21. Becker, H. J. (1994). How Exemplary Computer-Using Teachers Differ From Other Teachers: Implications for Realizing the Potential of Computers in Schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1994.10782093
22. Becker, W. C. (1991). Toward an integration of behavioural and cognitive psychologies through instructional technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2273
23. Becker, H.J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report No. 1). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150927709
24. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 51. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n51.2000
25. Ben Youssef, Adel, Mounir Dahmani, and Ludovic Ragni. (2022). "ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide" Information 13, no. 3: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
26. Berg, Susan; Benz, Carolyn; Lasley, Tom; Raisch, Dan. (1997). The Coordinators and the Teachers: A Description of Exemplary Use of Technology in Elementary Classrooms.ERIC. ERIC Number: ED414877. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED414877
27. Burnett, J. R., & Lisk, T. C. (2021). The future of employee engagement: Real-time monitoring and digital tools for engaging a workforce. In M. Segalla (Ed.), International perspectives on employee engagement (pp. 117–128). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142492-9
28. Blanchard, C., Pelletier, L., Otis, N. & Sharp, E. (2004). Rôle de l’autodétermination et des aptitudes scolaires dans la prédiction des absences scolaires et l’intention de décrocher. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.7202/011772ar
29. Brault-Labbé, A., & Dubé, L. (2010). Engagement scolaire, bien-être personnel et autodétermination chez des étudiants à l’université [School engagement, personal well-being and self-determination in university students]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 42(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017385
30. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
31. Boufarouj, C. et Mdarbi, S. (2022). Appropriation des TICE et performance éducative des enseignants du supérieur : Cas des universités publiques de la région Casablanca - Settat. Revue de Management et Cultures, 7, pp. 366-381. https://doi.org/10.48430/IMIST.PRSM/remac-n7.34245
32. Beck, L. A. (1992). Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969876
33. Biagi F., Loi M. (2013). Measuring ICT Use and Learning Outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp. 28-42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejed.12016
34. Cabellos, B., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2024). The moderating role of school facilitating conditions and attitudes towards ICT on teachers’ ICT use and emphasis on developing students’ digital skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107994
35. Calderón, A., Meroño, L., & MacPhail, A. (2020). A student-centred digital technology approach: The relationship between intrinsic motivation, learning climate and academic achievement of physical education pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19850852
36. Cécile Kindelbeger, Claire Safont-Mottay. (2023). Trajectoires d’élaboration d’un projet vocationnel au cours du lycée : interrelations avec les processus identitaires, la motivation et les indicateurs de décrochage scolaire. L'Orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 52/2, pp.307-339. 10.4000/osp.17450. hal-04350841
37. Chang, CS., Chung, CH. & Chang, J.A. (2020). Influence of problem-based learning games on effective computer programming learning in higher education. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 2615–2634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09784-3
38. Chen, MJ., She, HC. & Tsai, PY. (2024). The effects of online simulation-based collaborative problem-solving on students’ problem-solving, communication and collaboration attitudes. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12609-y
39. Cheng, C. C., & Carolyn Yang, Y. T. (2023). Impact of smart classrooms combined with student-centered pedagogies on rural students’ learning outcomes: Pedagogy and duration as moderator variables. Computers and Education, 207, Article 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104911
40. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F., (1987). Appendix A: Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. (47):63 - 69. DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219914708
41. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 29
42. Chordia, I., Yip, J.C., & Hiniker, A. (2019). Intentional Technology Use in Early Childhood Education. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1 - 22. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:207957080
43. Csernoch, M., Biró, P., Máth, J. and Abari, K. (2015) Testing Algorithmic Skills in Traditional and Non-Traditional Programming Environments. Informatics in Education, 14, 175-197. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2015.11
44. Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 53(8):p 856-866. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
45. David, L., Weinstein, N. (2024). Using technology to make learning fun: technology use is best made fun and challenging to optimize intrinsic motivation and engagement. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 1441–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00734-0
46. De Juana-Espinosa, Susana Amalia, Brotons Matilde. (2023). An Analysis of Best Practices to Enhance Higher Education Teaching Staff Digital and Multimedia Skills.Human Systems Management, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 193-207, DOI: 10.3233/HSM-220060
47. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104 01
48. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431–441). University of Rochester Press.
49. Diego Fernando Fernando Barragan, Juan Carlos Amador Báquiro. (2020). Appropriation of ICT in the educational field: approach to public policy in Colombia years 2000-2019. Digital Education Review. Number 37. http://greav.ub.edu/der/
50. Deniger, M. A. (2004). La plénière sur la réussite éducative. Synthèse de la clôture. Tous ensemble pour la réussite. Colloque sur la collaboration recherche-intervention en réussite éducative. CTREQ.
51. Dr, S. Puranik. (2020). Innovative Teaching Methods in Higher Education. BSSS Journal of Education. Vol. IX, Issue-I. ISSN:2582-4872. https://doi.org/10.51767/je0907
52. Dimkêeg Sompassaté Parfait Kabore. (2021). L'intégration pédagogique des TIC dans l'enseignement supérieur au Burkina Faso : accessibilité, usages et appropriation par les étudiants. Education. Université de Strasbourg; Université de Koudougou. Français. (NNT : 2021STRAG005).
53. Edward Nketiah-Amponsah, Moses Kumi Asamoah, William Allassani, Lawrence Kwami Aziale. (2017). Examining students’ experience with the use of some selected ICT devices and applications for learning and their effect on academic performance. J. Comput. Educ. 4, 441–460 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0089-2
54. Ertmer P.A. et al. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers : Perceptions of factors influencing success. ISTE, pp. 55-61. URL : https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876918.pdf
55. Ferrero, A. M., & Álvarez Sainz, M. (2024). Attitudes of university students towards traditional face-to-face learning systems and learning with ICT. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(2), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156185
56. Fernández Cárdenas, Juan Manuel. (2004). The appropriation and mastery of cultural tools in computer supported collaborative literacy practices. PhD thesis The Open University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.0000d561
57. Fernandes, V. (2012). En quoi l’approche PLS est-elle une méthode a (re)-découvrir pour les chercheurs en management? M@N@ Gement, 15, 102-123. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.151.0102
58. Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
59. Fonseca Montoya, S., Fernández Rodríguez , M. M., & Maino Isaías , A. (2024). Prácticas Educativas Innovadoras Mediadas por las TIC: Impacto en la Calidad del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje. Sinergias Educativas, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.37954/se.v9i2.440
60. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.5(2), 295-336
61. François Mangenot. (2000). L'intégration des TIC dans une perspective systémique. Langues Modernes, Les nouveaux dispositifs d'apprentissage des langues vivantes, 3 / 2000, pp.38-44. hal-02045268
62. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.management, 15(1), 102-123. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/344
63. Ganiyu, R. S., Olasedidun, O. K., & Femi-Adeoye, K. O. (2024). Curriculum Reform in the Digital Age: Exploring the Role of ICT in Enhancing Teaching and Learning. Journal of Library, Science Education and Learning Technology (JOLSELT), (5)1, 14-23.
64. Gartzia-Rivero, Leire and Sánchez-Carnerero, Esther M. and Jiménez, Josue and Bañuelos, Jorge and Moreno, Florencio and Maroto, Beatriz L. and López-Arbeloa, Iñigo and de la Moya, Santiago. (2017). Modulation of ICT probability in bi(polyarene)-based O-BODIPYs: towards the development of low-cost bright arene-BODIPY dyads. Dalton Trans. V 46, issue: 35, p: 11830-11839. doi: 10.1039/C7DT01984J.
65. George D. Kuh & Shouping Hu. (2001). Learning Productivity at Research Universities, The Journal of Higher Education, 72:1, 1-28, DOI:10.1080/00221546.2001.11778862
66. Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). Editor's comments : an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS quarterly, iii-xiv
67. Hanaysha, J.R., Shriedeh, F.B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, 3, 100188
68. Hamzi Kheir Eddine Yassine, Benmarouf Mohamed Nabil, Bentaieb Samia. (2024). Optimisation des Ressources Énergétiques grâce à la Prédiction de la Consommation Électrique : Approche Analytique et Prédictive basée sur l'Intelligence Artificielle.
69. Hanieh Shafiee Rad, Javad Alipour, Aliakbar Jafarpour, Mahmood Hashemian. (2024). Unlocking the magic of digital adaptivity: Unleashing students' writing skills and self-determination motivation through digital literacy instruction, System, Volume 125, 103454, ISSN 0346-251X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103454
70. Heather Kirkpatrick and Larry Cuban. (1998). Computers Make Kids Smarter—Right?. TECHNOS QUARTERLY. Vol. 7 No. 2. https://dailypapert.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/TECHNOS-Cuban.pdf
71. Heath, M.K., Gleason, B., Mehta, R., Hall., T, (2023). More than knowing: toward collective, critical, and ecological approaches in educational technology research. Education Tech Research Dev . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10242-z
72. Hetmańczyk, P. (2024). Digitalization and its impact on labour market and education. Selected aspects. Educ Inf Technol 29, 11119–11134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12203-8
73. Hontarenko, I., & Kovalenko, O. (2024). Enhancing Teaching: The Crucial Role of Effective Preparation and Delivery of Lectures. Educational Challenges, 29(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.05
74. Hooker, M. (1997). The transformation of higher education. In Diane Oblinger and Sean C. Rush (Eds.). http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/seminars/Hooker.html
75. Idowu Sulaimon Adeniyi, Nancy Mohd Al Hamad, Ololade Elizabeth Adewusi, Chika Chioma Unachukwu, Blessing Osawaru, Chisom Nneamaka Onyebuchi, Samuel Ayodeji Omolawal, Aderonke Omotayo Aliu and Isiah Oden David. (2024). Educational reforms and their impact on student performance: A review in African. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(02), 750–762. DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0490
76. Ioannou, A., Lycett, M. & Marshan, A. (2024). The Role of Mindfulness in Mitigating the Negative Consequences of Technostress. Inf Syst Front 26, 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10239-0
77. Johnstone, D.B. (1993). Learning Productivity: A New Imperative for American Higher Education. Studies in Public Higher Education Number 3.https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:155567164. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED357721
78. Joshua Angrist, Victor Lavy. (2002). New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning, The Economic Journal, Volume 112, Issue 482, Pages 735–765, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00068
79. Kapo, A., Milutinovic, L.D., Rakovic, L. et Maric, S. (2024). Enhancing e-learning effectiveness: analyzing extrinsic and intrinsic factors influencing students’ use, learning, and performance in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 29, 10249–10276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12224-3
80. Kimuya, C., Kimani, G., & Mwaura, J. (2021). Relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ enhancement of ict in teaching and learning strategy and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in nairobi city county, kenya. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(6). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i6.3830
81. King, Laura; Jorgensen, Mary; Lussier, Alex; Fichten, Catherine; Havel, Alice; Amsel, Rhonda; Poldma, Tiiu; Budd, Jillian; Jorgensen, Shirley; Marcil, Evelyne; Nguyen, Mai Nhu; Chauvin, Alexandre; Asuncion, Jennison. (2017). Student and professor perspectives on exemplary practices in the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and e-learning in colleges. Modified version of report for the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture (FRQSC) and the ministère de l'Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur (MEES). Montréal, Québec : Réseau de Recherche Adaptech.
82. Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the Potential Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Academic Achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918
83. Ko E.J. et al. (2021). Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 171, pp. 1-12. DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120994
84. Koopmans, Linda MSc; Bernaards, Claire M. (2011). PhD; Hildebrandt, Vincent H. PhD; Schaufeli, Wilmar B. PhD; de Vet Henrica, C.W. PhD; van der Beek, Allard J. PhD.
85. Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., Rivera-Torres, P., Liesa-Orús, M. (2024). ICT efficacy and response to different needs in university classrooms: effects on attitudes and active behaviour towards technology. J Comput High Educ 36, 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09357-2
86. Lawrence C. Ragan, Thomas B. Cavanagh, Raymond Schroeder, Kelvin Thompson. (2023). Supporting Faculty Success in Online Learning: Requirements for Individual and Institutional Leadership. Leading the eLearning Transformation of Higher Education. 2nd Edition, p.22, eBook ISBN9781003445623. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003445623-10/supporting-faculty-success-online-learning-lawrence-ragan-thomas-cavanagh-raymond-schroeder-kelvin thompson
87. Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento-Márquez, E. M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2021). Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113
88. Lévy J., (2000). Les nouveaux espaces de la mobilité. In Bonnet M. et Des jeux D., Les territoires de la mobilité, Paris, PUF, coll. Sciences sociales et sociétés, p. 155-170. https://shs.cairn.info/article/PUF_BONNE_2000_01_0155?tab=premieres-lignes
89. Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld, Ann Bygholm, Geoffrey Olok Tabo. (2023). Transforming education through ICT: Exploring students' study practices in a resource-constrained university setting. British journal of educational technology. Volume 54, Issue 6, p. 1463-1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13367
90. Lukman, R., & Krajnc, M. (2012). Exploring Non-traditional Learning Methods in Virtual and Real-world Environments. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 237–247.
91. Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Evidence of a continuum structure of academic selfdetermination: A two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 67–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010
92. Lina Daouk, Muawya Aldalaien. (2019). The usage of E-learning instructional technologies in higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, ERIC. v18 n3 p97-109. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1223782
93. Magdalena Kania-Lundholm. (2023). Coping in the culture of connectivity: How older adults make sense of living with digital ageism. Digital Ageism. Routledge. 1st Edition, p. 18, EBook:ISBN9781003323686. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/63221/9781000904796.pdf?sequence=1#page=209
94. Margaret L. Hilton, Margaret A. Honey. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. National Academies Press. ISBN 0309212669, 9780309212663.
95. Margarita Núñez-Canal, M de las Mercedes de Obesso, Carlos Alberto Pérez-Rivero. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 174, ISSN 0040-1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270
96. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual review of psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
97. MacKinnon, D. P., Cheong, J., & Pirlott, A. G. (2012). Statistical mediation analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 313–331). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-018
98. Marshall Scott Poole, Michael Holmes, Gerardine Desanctis. (1991) Conflict Management in a Computer-Supported Meeting Environment. Management Science 37(8):926-953. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.8.926
99. Meza M. and C García. (2018). Use and appropriation of ICT in the educational practices of teachers of the program of environmental engineering of the Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1126, 012048: 1-6. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012048/meta
100. Munro, M.C., S.L. Huff, B.L. Marcolin et D.R. Compeau (1997), Understanding and measuring user competence, Information & Management, vol. 33, p. 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00035-9
101. Moses ekwufolu, .O. (2024). harnessing e-learning technologies for sustainable development of library and information science (lis) education in Nigeria. American Research Journal of Contemporary Issues, 2(1), 90-106. https://www.openjournals.ijaar.org/index.php/arjci/article/view/400
102. Nasirun, N., & Shahidan, A. N. (2024). Assessing the mediating role of student engagement on the relationship between student interactions and student performance in entrepreneurship education. Global Business Management Review (GBMR), 16(1), 83–97. Retrieved from. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/gbmr/article/view/24276
103. Nira Hativa, Rachel Barak & Etty Simhi. (2001). Exemplary University Teachers, The Journal of Higher Education, 72:6, 699-729. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2001.11777122
104. Ngoc Hoi, V. (2021). Augmenting student engagement through the use of social media: the role of knowledge sharing behaviour and knowledge sharing self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4021–4033. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1948871
105. Ní Shé, Caitríona, Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn, and Ciarán Mac an Bhaird. (2023). Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Resources in Mathematics in Higher Education: A Review. Mathematics 11, no. 3: 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787
106. Oguguo, B.C.E., Nannim, F.A., Agah, J.J., Ugwuanyi, C.S, Ene, C.U, Nzeadibe, A.C. (2021). Effect of learning management system on Student’s performance in educational measurement and evaluation. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10318-w
107. Osias Kit T. Kilag, Ghuen B. Segarra, Anna Mae L. De Gracia, Adones S. del Socorro, Cara Frances K. Abendan, Glennifer A. Camangyan, Eduard T. Mahasol. (2023). ICT application in teaching and learning. "Science and Education" Scientific Journal / Impact Factor 3,848 (SJIF)/ Volume 4 Issue 2. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ict-application-in-teaching-and-learning
108. Owan, Valentine Joseph and Asuquo, Michael Ekpenyong. (2021). Assessment of Socio-Demographic Factors and Students’ Satisfaction with the Study of ICT in Secondary Schools (July 17, 2021). Owan, V. J., & Asuquo, M. E. Assessment of socio-demographic factors and students’ satisfaction with the study of ICT in secondary schools. Pedagogical Research, 6(3), em0101. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11087, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3906934
109. O'Brien, H. L., Roll, I., Kampen, A., & Davoudi, N. (2022). Rethinking (dis)engagement in human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, Article 107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107109
110. Ou, W. A., & Gu, M. M. (2021). Competence beyond language: translanguaging and spatial repertoire in teacher-student interaction in a music classroom in an international Chinese University. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(8), 2741–2758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1949261
111. Pardo, A., & Román, M. (2013). Reflections on the Baron and Kenny model of statistical mediation. Anales de Psicología, 29(2), 614–623.
112. Parks, Amanda; Pisapia, John. (1994). Developing Exemplary Technology-Using Teachers. Research Brief #8. ERIC. ERIC Number: ED411360. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED411360
113. Perrenoud P. (2002). Les cycles d’apprentissage : Une autre organisation du travail pour combattre l'échec scolaire. ISBN : 9782760512085. DOI : 10.2307/j.ctv18ph5sx
114. Pelletier C. and Moreau M.F. (2008). L’appropriation des technologies de l’Internet et ses facteurs critiques de succès : un défi de plus pour les PME ?. Revue internationale P.M.E. : économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise 21 (2): 75-117. https://doi.org/10.7202/029432ar
115. Pierson M.E. (2001). Pratique d'intégration technologique en fonction de l'expertise pédagogique. Journal de recherche sur l'informatique dans l'éducation, 33 (4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
116. Paivandi S. (2018). Performance universitaire, apprentissage et temporalité des étudiants. Revue française de pédagogie, 202, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.7546
117. Qolamani, K., & Mohammed, M. M. (2023). The Digital Revolution in Higher Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 15(2), 837-846. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i2.3905
118. Raby C. (2004). Analyse du cheminement qui a mené des enseignants du primaire à développer une utilisation exemplaire des technologies de l’information et de la communication en classe. Education. Université de Montréal, pp. 1-459, Edutice-00000750
119. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer
120. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor's comments : a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in" MIS Quarterly". MIS quarterly, iii-xiv
121. Roux A. (2007). De l’usage à la pratique : les processus d’appropriation. Emprunts à la théorie de la structuration et empreinte du chercheur. Revue scientifique francophone en Communication organisationnelle, 34, pp. 124-139. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/communicationorganisation.168
122. Romuald Bodin, Mathias Millet. (2012). L’université, un espace de régulation. L’abandon dans les 1ers cycles à l’aune de la socialisation universitaire. Sociologie, 2 (11), pp.225-242. ff10.3917/socio.023.0225ff. ffhal-00983904f
123. Salim Ouahab. (2024). Effet de l’intégration didactico-pédagogique des Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication (TIC) sur la motivation et la performance des étudiants universitaires : Analyse des répercussions sur les compétences langagières en FLE. Ziglôbitha, Revue des Arts, Linguistique, Littérature & Civilisations.ISSN-L 2708-390X, eISSN 2709-2836. n°09 pp.537-556. https://www.ziglobitha.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/038-Art.-Salim-Ouahab-pp.537-556.pdf
124. Schroeder, Connie. (2010). Coming in from the Margins: Faculty Development's Emerging Organizational Development Role in Institutional Change. Routledge. ISBN 9781579223632
125. Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M.B. (1990). Accomplished Teachers: Integrating Computers into Classroom Practice. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151200086
126. Shahzad, Muhammad Farrukh, Xu, Shuo, Lim, Weng Marc, Yang, Xingbing, Khan, Qasim Raza. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Heliyon. Elsevier. 10 (8), doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523
127. Sharpe, Andrew. (2004). Ten Productivity Puzzles Facing Researchers. International Productivity Monitor, Number 9, Fall, pp. 15-24 (posted at www.csls.ca).
128. Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2020). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: the mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959
129. Scheerens, J. (2015). Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness: A Critical Review of the Knowledge Base.
130. Silva, J.C., Coelho Rodrigues, J. & Miguéis, V.L. (2024). Factors influencing the use of information and communication technologies by students for educational purposes. Educ Inf Technol 29, 9313–9353 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12132-6
131. Sigmen M. (2006). La performance dans l'enseignement supérieur : Vers une redéfinition de l'avantage concurrentiel - HEC Montréal.
132. Sun, H., Xie, Y., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Effects of the use of ICT in schools on students’ science higher-order thinking skills: comparative study of China and Finland. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(2), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2116421
133. Stumbrienė, D., Jevsikova, T. & Kontvainė, V. (2024). Key factors influencing teachers’ motivation to transfer technology-enabled educational innovation. Educ Inf Technol 29, 1697–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-6
134. Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research, 51(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880903354741
135. Sylvie St-Onge Michel Magnan, (2007). Chapitre 1. La gestion des performances des organisations et des personnes. Pages 15 à 52. DOI: 10.3917/dbu.onge.2007.01.0015
136. Srijamdee, K., Pholphirul, P. (2020). Does ICT familiarity always help promote educational outcomes? Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Educ Inf Technol 25, 2933–2970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10089-z
137. Tolani-Brown, N., McCormac, M., & Zimmermann, R. (2011). An Analysis of the Research and Impact of ICT in Education in Developing Country Contexts. In J. Steyn & G. Johanson (Eds.), ICTs and Sustainable Solutions for the Digital Divide: Theory and Perspectives (pp. 218-242). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-799-2.ch011
138. Turienzo, J. (2024). A transversal and practical education as a business success factor: literature review of learning process of basic design through ICT tools. Journal of Management and Business Education, 7(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2024.0005
139. Tularam, G.A., & Machisella, P. (2018). Traditional vs Non-traditional Teaching and Learning Strategies - the case of E-learning! International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
140. Tayseer Alnoaimi, J. Enrique Hinostroza, shafika Isaacs, Robert Kozma, Philip Wong. (2011). Using ICT policy to Transform Education. Transforming education: the power of ICT policies. ISBN : 978-92-3-104212-6. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000211842
141. Valverde-Berrocoso J, Acevedo-Borrega J and Cerezo-Pizarro M. (2022). Educational Technology and Student Performance: A Systematic Review. Front. Educ. 7:916502. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.916502
142. Van Dusen, Gerald C. (1997). The Virtual Campus: Technology and Reform in Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 25, No. 5.ISBN: ISBN-1-878380-77-X. ISSN: ISSN-0884-0040. p. 191. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed412816
143. Vithal, K.S.R. (2013). The relationship between academic performance and publication productivity of agricultural faculty members. Pearl A Journal of Library and Information Science, 7(4), pp. 237-242
144. Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Yidan, L., Yuhui Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
145. Watson, J. H. (2024). From Intention to Action: How Preservice Teachers Use Technology-Enabled Learning During Student Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241268577
146. Webster, J., & Ho, H. (1997). Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. Data Base, V 28, p. 63-77. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15845659
147. Wilson & Wilson. (2009). Digital Divide: Impediment to ICT and Peace Building in Developing Countries. American Communication Journal. Vol. 11, No. 2, https://ac-journal.org/journal/2009/Summer/5TheDigitalDivide.pdf
148. William H. DeLone, Ephraim R. McLean. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1):60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
149. Xu, S., Khan, K.I. & Shahzad, M.F. (2024). Examining the influence of technological self-efficacy, perceived trust, security, and electronic word of mouth on ICT usage in the education sector. Sci Rep 14, 16196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66689-4
150. Xiao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). Regression analysis of ICT impact factors on early adolescents’ reading proficiency in five high-performing countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01646
151. Xiaohua Zhai, Joan Puigcerver, Alexander Kolesnikov, Pierre Ruyssen, Carlos Riquelme, Mario Lucic, Josip Djolonga, Andre Susano Pinto, Maxim Neumann, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Olivier Bachem, Michael Tschannen, Marcin Michalski, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly, Neil Houlsby. (2019). A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. V2. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04867
152. Yildiz Çankaya, S. and Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0099
153. Yüceol, N. (2021). The Steps to be Taken in Higher Education for Successful Adaptation to Industry 4.0. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(3), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.617715
154. York, T.T., Gibson, C.W., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and Measuring Academic Success. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 20, 1-20.
155. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reconsiderer Baron et Kenny: mythes et verites a propos de l’analyse de mediation. Recherche et Applications En Marketing, 26(1), 81–95. doi:10.1177/076737011102600105
156. Zeng, J., Parks, S. E., & Shang, J. (2020). To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: a review of educational games. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.188
157. Zhang, Jing, Zengzhao Chen, Jingjing Ma, and Zhi Liu. (2021). Investigating the Influencing Factors of Teachers’ Information and Communications Technology-Integrated Teaching Behaviors toward “Learner-Centered” Reform Using Structural Equation Modeling. Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212614
158. Zhao, Chunkai & Chen, Boou, (2023). ICT in education can improve students’ achievements in rural China: The role of parents, educators and authorities. Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 320-344.
159. Zhou, C., Wu, D., Li, Y., Hao Yang. H, Man, S. & Min Chen, M. (2023). The role of student engagement in promoting teachers’ continuous learning of TPACK: based on a stimulus-organism-response framework and an integrative model of behavior prediction. Educ Inf Technol 28, 2207–2227 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11237-8
Published
2024-10-31
How to Cite
Mdarbi, S., Simour, L., Boufarouj, C., Belkebir, Z., Stili, K., & Ennadi, M. (2024). The Role of Individual Performance in the Effect of ICT Appropriation on Educational Performance of Students in Public Universities in the Casablanca-Settat Region, Morocco. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 20(28), 67. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n28p67
Section
ESJ Social Sciences
Copyright (c) 2024 Said Mdarbi, Lhoussain Simour, Chaimae Boufarouj, Zineb Belkebir, Khadija Stili, Mouad Ennadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
