Evaluation of an ESP Textbook Used at the College of Business Studies in Kuwait from the Learners' Perspective Regarding Their Future Career Needs

Nour Haidar Haidar

doi:10.19044/esj.2024.v20n35p44

Nour Haidar Haidar The College of Business Studies at The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training in Kuwait

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n35p44

Keywords: English for Specific Purposes, English as a Foreign Language, English Language Teaching, checklist, Assessment

Abstract

This study evaluates an English for Specific Purposes textbook used for teaching at the College of Business Studies in Kuwait to assess learners' perceptions and effectiveness in preparing them for future careers in the business world. The study involved 122 learners enrolled at the college, and ten English language instructors employed there. These objectives were accomplished by using quantitative methods for data collection and analysis. A checklist is prepared for learners to analyze their perspectives on the textbook. This checklist is used in the interviews and the questionnaire to ascertain their points of view. The findings supported the hypothesis that the learners’ perspectives on the textbook were varied. Most learners regarded the textbook as helpful in fulfilling their requirements and preparing them for future employment. However, a minority of learners believed the textbook was unsuitable for their English proficiency. The textbook was particularly beneficial in the reading, listening, and speaking skills. However, it did not adequately focus on developing the writing skills. It provided professional tasks and viewpoints, including expert speakers and real company case studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for specific purposes. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351031189
2. Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 415-427). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
3. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
4. Dehrab, B. (2002). A Study of Code-Switching in Four English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Classrooms at the College of Business Studies in Kuwait. Ohio State University, USA.
5. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
7. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689
8. Fajardo-Dack, T. (2016). Teacher disempowerment in the education system of Ecuador. World Journal of Education, 6(3), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n3p82
9. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.4.315
10. Knight, K. (2022). English for specific purposes project leader profiles: The leadership communication of 55 ESP project leaders. Hong Kong: Candlin & Mynard e Publishing
11. Knoch, U., & Macqueen, S. (2022). Assessing English for professional purposes. London: Routledge.
12. Laborda, G. (2005). A Textbook Analysis of Travel & Tourism Textbooks from the Perspective of University Students’ Attitudes Towards English as a Foreign Language Learning Newsletter of the IATEFL ESP SIG. (27), 19-24 Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED504831.pdf
13. Liu, Y., & Hu, G. (2021). Mapping the field of English for specific purposes (1980-2018): A co-citation analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.003
14. Macalister, J., & Nation, I. (2020). Language curriculum design (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203763
15. McGrath, I. (2016). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
16. Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
17. Mukundan, J. (2007). Evaluation of English language textbooks: Some important issues for consideration. Journal of NELTA, 12(1-2), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v12i1.3432
18. Mukundan, J., & Kalajahi, S. (2013). Evaluation of Malaysian English language teaching textbooks. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 1(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.1p.38
19. Richards, J. (2017). Curriculum development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024556
20. Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
21. Siegel, J. (2021). Evaluating EAP Notetaking Textbooks: Eight Key Questions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100952
22. Straszniczky, N. (2010). Evaluating English business coursebooks with a specific focus on Austrian adult learners. Unpublished E-Thesis, Vienna University.
23. Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 269-278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778
24. Viana, V., Bocorny, A., & Sarmento, S. (2019). Teaching English for specific purposes. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL Press.