Enhancing the Writing Process: Integrating Applied Linguistics Learning Assessment in the Classroom

  • Hector A. Aponte-Alequin University of Puerto Rico
Keywords: Applied Linguistics, basic writing, learning assessment, rubric, objective test

Abstract

This study in Applied Linguistics to the writing process addresses the challenge of assessing and improving basic writing skills among 120 incoming students at the University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus. Faced with instructor reports of significant writing deficiencies and a lack of calibrated, objective evaluation methods like a specific choice test or a proficiency scale based on observed performance, the study focused on developing and implementing new assessment tools within a basic writing course. Specifically, an objective test and a calibrated rubric were designed, informed by principles of applied linguistics, to establish clear performance expectations and guide pedagogical interventions. While the assessment revealed that over 70% of students demonstrated proficiency in three key learning objectives, as measured by achieving a passing score on the test and a "Good" rating on the rubric-assessed text, the substantial instructional time required to achieve these outcomes highlighted a mismatch between student needs and the existing curriculum. This finding, informed by the applied linguistic analysis of student performance, led to a significant curricular change: the original course was restructured into two distinct subjects to provide more targeted instruction and support for developing writers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Bawa, P. (2020). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019897893
2. Cassany, D., Luna, M., & Sanz, G. (2007). Enseñar lengua. Graó.
3. Franco, A. (2005). Gramática del módulo actancial aplicada al estilo periodístico. Quórum Académico, 1(2), 27-44.
4. Fumero, J. (2021). El impacto del inglés como vehículo de difusión científica en la universidad española. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 23, 111-128.
5. García, D., & Fumero, M. (2010). Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada. Peter Lang.
6. Gatica-Lara, A., & Uribarren-Berrueta, I. (2013). Cómo elaborar una rúbrica. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(1), 61-6.
7. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
8. Hunt, K. (1970). How little sentences grow into big ones. En M. Lester (Ed.), Readings in applied transformational grammar (pp. 15-36). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9. Ibarra-Sáiz, M.S., Lukas-Mujika, J.-F., Ponce-González, N., & Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2023). Percepción del profesorado universitario sobre la calidad de las tareas de evaluación de los resultados de aprendizaje. RELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i1.27404
10. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
11. Kumar, V., & Rani, S. (2021). A comparative study of assessment methods in online and traditional classrooms: Implications for higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(5), 1029-1044. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2020-0012
12. Kuh, G. D., Jankowski, N., Ikenberry, S. O., & Kinzie, J. (2014). Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
13. Milian, M., & Camps, A. (2006). El razonamiento metalingüístico en el marco de las secuencias didácticas de gramática. Revista de Educación, 341, 145-166.
14. Omaggio, A. (1993). Research in language learning: principles, processes, and prospects. National Textbook Company.
15. Peters, J., Schmude, K., & Steinmiller, E. (2013). Educational testing and validity of conclusions in the scholarship of teaching and learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), 186. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe779186
16. Stovall, T. (2014). Writing for the Mass Media (9th ed.). Pearson.
Published
2025-02-28
How to Cite
Aponte-Alequin, H. A. (2025). Enhancing the Writing Process: Integrating Applied Linguistics Learning Assessment in the Classroom. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 21(5), 35. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n5p35
Section
ESJ Humanities