Transforming Teaching Methods for Business Students: Motivation Focused Approach

  • Vakhtang Charaia Grigol Robakidze University, Georgia
  • Tengiz Taktakishvili Grigol Robakidze University, Georgia
Keywords: Teaching methods, student motivation, feedback

Abstract

This study examines the factors that influence student motivation in learning, specifically studying the role of feedback and teaching methods. Using regression analysis, we identified two main factors that significantly increase student motivation: constructive feedback and teaching methods that facilitate understanding of study materials. Moreover, relevant literature and contemporary teaching methods were discussed. Results show that students are more motivated when they receive improvement-promoting feedback because it supports their academic growth and engagement. In addition, teaching methods that promote understanding and create an enjoyable learning environment go a long way in promoting sustained motivation. These results highlight the importance of developmental feedback and effective teaching methods in creating a positive and motivating educational experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Abou Khalil, Victoria & Helou, Samar & Khalife, Eliane & Chen, Mei-Rong & Majumdar, Rwitajit & Ogata, Hiroaki. (2021). Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. Education Sciences. 11. 24. 10.3390/educsci11010024.
2. Arasti, Zahra & Corresponding, & Falavarjani, Mansoreh & Imanipour, Narges. (2012). A Study of Teaching Methods in Entrepreneurship Education for Graduate Students. Higher Education Studies. 2. 10.5539/hes.v2n1p2.
3. Bajaj, Preeti & Ahuja, Ashish & Shriram, Gosavi. (2013). Problem Based Learning (PBL) - An Effective Approach to Improve Learning Outcomes in Medical Teaching. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 7. 2896-7. 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7339.3787.
4. Bolliger, Doris & Martin, Florence. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education. 39. 568–583. 10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041.
5. Deeley, Susan & Bovill, Catherine. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42. 463-477. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551.
6. Eom, Sean. (2012). Effects of LMS, self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning on LMS effectiveness in business education. Journal of International Education in Business. 5. 10.1108/18363261211281744.
7. Harackiewicz, Judith & Tibbetts, Yoi & Canning, Elizabeth & Hyde, Janet. (2014). Harnessing Values to Promote Motivation in Education. 10.1108/S0749-742320140000018002.
8. Heilporn, Géraldine & Lakhal, Sawsen & Belisle, Marilou. (2021). An examination of teachers' strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 18. 10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3.
9. Huber, E., Harris, L., Wright, S., White, A., Raduescu, C., Zeivots, S., Cram, A., & Brodzeli, A. (2023). Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49, 102 - 116.
10. Iliyasu, A., & Daramola, R. (2023). Evaluating Entrepreneurial Skills Needed by Business Education Students for Self-employment in Colleges of Education, Kano State. Futurity Education.
11. Khaldi, Amina & Bouzidi, Rokia & Nader, Fahima. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: a systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments. 10. 10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z.
12. Martin, Florence & Bolliger, Doris. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning. 22. 205-222. 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092.
13. Masika, Rachel & Jones, Jennifer. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education. 21. 138-150. 10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585.
14. Ogunleye, J.K., Afolabi, C.S., Ajayi, S.O., & Omotayo, V.A. (2023). Virtual Learning as an Impetus for Business Education Programme in the Midst of COVID-19 in Nigeria. Health Economics and Management Review.
15. Orsini, Cesar & Binnie, Vivian & Wilson, Sarah. (2016). Determinants and outcomes of motivation in health professions education: a systematic review based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 13. 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.19.
16. Radulović, B., Dorocki, M., Olic Ninkovic, S., Stojanovic, M., & Adamov, J. (2023). THE EFFECTS OF BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH ON STUDENT MOTIVATION FOR LEARNING PHYSICS. Journal of Baltic Science Education.
17. Van Rompay-Bartels, I., & Tuninga, R.S. (2023). Toward a model of global citizenship in business education. Journal of Transnational Management, 28, 5 - 34.
18. Zulfiqar, Salman & Sarwar, Binesh & Aziz, Saira & Chandia, Khurram & Khan, Muhammad. (2018). An Analysis of Influence of Business Simulation Games on Business School Students’ Attitude and Intention Toward Entrepreneurial Activities. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 57. 073563311774674. 10.1177/0735633117746746.
Published
2025-03-15
How to Cite
Charaia, V., & Taktakishvili, T. (2025). Transforming Teaching Methods for Business Students: Motivation Focused Approach. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 21(39), 78. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n39p78