Evaluating Biological Risks in Biomedical Laboratories of Primary Health Care

  • Dionysios Vourtsis Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Efstathia Papageorgiou Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Anastasios Kriebardis Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Gijsbert van Willigen Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Holland
  • Kostas Kotrokois Department of Public Health Policies, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
  • Petros Karkalousos Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Keywords: Biorisk management, Biosafety, Biomedical laboratories, Risk evaluation, Primary Health Care

Abstract

Biomedical laboratories within primary health care centers are vital for the detection, diagnosis, and management of diseases. However, handling diagnostic samples poses significant biological risks, particularly when biosafety measures are insufficient. This study focuses on analyzing the biological risks in 35 BSL-2 biomedical laboratories situated in health facilities across Athens, Greece, by examining compliance with biosafety regulations, awareness of personnel safety, and practices related to biorisk management. A cross-sectional survey was conducted by combining a customized checklist and a structured health and safety questionnaire, both have been created from the existing literature including the international biosafety guidelines (BMBL 6th ed., WHO Biosafety Program Management, 2020). An expert biorisk management advisor performed on-site evaluations, while 158 laboratory staff members filled out anonymous questionnaires concerning biosafety practices. Findings indicate widespread deficiencies in biosafety culture and risk management. Key gaps were identified in engineering controls (such as restricted access and safety equipment), administrative controls (including risk assessments, standard operating procedures, biosafety manuals, biosafety officers, and ongoing training), personal protective equipment (PPE policies), and emergency preparedness (such as incident reporting, response plans, and occupational health services). Many laboratories failed to meet international biosafety standards set by the WHO, CDC, and ECDC, highlighting the need for urgent improvements. To mitigate these risks, the study recommends the adoption of comprehensive Biorisk Management Systems, enhanced biosafety training, and stricter enforcement of national and European biosafety regulations. Strengthening these measures is essential to protect the laboratory staff, the surrounding community, and the environment from potential biological threats and lab-acquired infections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Bathula, S. R. & Rakhimol, A. (2017). Global Trends in biorisk Management. BioRisk, 12, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.12.12156
2. Blacksell, S. D., Dhawan, S., Kusumoto, M., Lě, K., Summermatter, K., O’Keefe, J., Kozlovac, J. P., Almuhairi, S. S., Sendow, I., Scheel, C. M., Ahumibe, A., Masuku, Z. M., Bennett, A., Kojima, K., Harper, D. R., & Hamilton, K. (2023). Laboratory-acquired infections and pathogen escapes worldwide between 2000 and 2021: a scoping review. The Lancet Microbe. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00319-1
3. Brown, C.S., Zwetyenga, J., Berdieva, M., Volkova T., Cojocaru R., Costic, N., Ciobanu, S., Hasanova, S., van Beers, S., & Oskam, L. (2015). New policy-formulation methodology paves the way for sustainable laboratory systems in Europe. Public Health Panor. 2015; 1(1):41-7.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2020). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 6th ed. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/laboratories/pdf/SF__19_308133-A_BMBL6_00-BOOK-WEB-final-3.pdf (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) & National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2021). Hierarchy of Controls. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/learning/safetyculturehc/module-3/2.html (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
6. Directive 2000/54/EC (2000). Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work (seventh individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32000L0054&from=EN (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
7. European Committee for Standardization, (2011). CEN Workshop Agreement. CWA 15793:2011, Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard. Available at:
8. https://internationalbiosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CWA-15793-English.pdf
9. Farr, J.M. & Shatkin, L. (2004). Best jobs for the 21st century. JIST Works. p. 460. ISBN 978-1-56370-961-6.
10. Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP), Division of Regulatory Science and Compliance (DRSC) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Inspection Checklists. Available at: https://www.selectagents.gov/compliance/preparing.htm (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
11. Gribble, L.A., Tria, E.S., & Wallis, L. (2015). ‘The AMP Model,’ in Salerno, R.M. and Gaudioso, J. (ed.) Laboratory Biorisk Management: Biosafety and Biosecurity, Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 31-42.
12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2019). ISO 35001:2019. Biorisk management for laboratories and other related organizations. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/71293.html (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), (2020). ISO 15190:2020. Medical laboratories – Requirements for safety. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/72191.html (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), (2022). ISO 15189:2022. Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
15. Kessel, M. (2014). Neglected diseases, delinquent diagnostics. Science Translational Medicine, 6(226). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008194
16. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (2024). NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines). DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://osp.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/NIH_Guidelines.pdf (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
17. Pike, R.M. (1976). Laboratory-associated infections. Summary and analysis of 3921 cases. Health and Laboratory Science vol 13, page 105-114.
18. Presidential Decree 102/2020 (Government Gazette 244/A’/07.12.2020) (2020). Available at: https://www.et.gr/api/DownloadFeksApi/?fek_pdf=20200100244 and https://www.gov.gr/sdg/work-and-retirement/health-and-safety-at-work/independent-authority-labour-inspectorate/obligations-of-companies (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
19. Raafat, H. & Sadhra, SS. (1999). In: Sadhra SS, Rampal KG, editors. Occupational health: risk assessment and management. 4th ed. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Science Ltd; 1999. pp. 177–193.
20. Sandia National Laboratories (2014). Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity Risk Assessment Technical Guidance Document. Available at: https://internationalbiosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Laboratory-Biosafety-and-Biosecurity-Risk-Assessment.pdf (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
21. Sewell, D. L. (1995). Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 8(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.8.3.389
22. Tun, T. A. (2017). Biomedical Laboratory: its safety and risk management. Journal of Experimental & Biomedical Sciences/Biomedical Science Letters, 23(3), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.15616/bsl.2017.23.3.155
23. Tziaferi, S., Sourtzi, P., Kalokairinou, A., Sgourou, E., Koumoulas, E., & Velonakis, E. (2011b). Risk assessment of physical hazards in Greek hospitals combining staff’s perception, experts’ evaluation and objective measurements. Safety and Health at Work, 2(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.5491/shaw.2011.2.3.260
24. World Health Organization (WHO) (2004). Laboratory Biosafety Manual. 3rd ed. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241546506 (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
25. World Health Organization (WHO) (2010). Responsible life sciences research for global health security, A guidance document. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HSE-GAR-BDP-2010.2 (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
26. World Health Organization (WHO) (2011). Laboratory Quality Management System: handbook, Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548274 (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
27. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020). Laboratory Biosafety Manual. 4th ed. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240011311 (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
28. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020). Laboratory biosafety manual, 4th edition: Biosafety programme management. Annex 2 (Biosafety risk assessment template). Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240011434 (Accessed: 23 March 2025)
29. Wurtz, N., Papa, A., Hukić, M., Di, A., Leparc-Goffart, I., Leroy, E. M., Landini, M., Sekeyová, Z., Dumler, J. S., Bădescu, D., Busquets, N., Calistri, A., Parolin, C., Palù, G., Christova, I., Maurin, M., La Scola, B., & Raoult, D. (2016). Survey of laboratory-acquired infections around the world in biosafety level 3 and 4 laboratories. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 35(8), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2657-1
Published
2025-04-08
How to Cite
Vourtsis, D., Papageorgiou, E., Kriebardis, A., van Willigen, G., Kotrokois, K., & Karkalousos, P. (2025). Evaluating Biological Risks in Biomedical Laboratories of Primary Health Care. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 40, 107. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/19348
Section
ESI Preprints

Most read articles by the same author(s)