Albania's Entities and Environmental Accounting: Current Public Disclosure and the Reality Behind Closed Doors
Abstract
Environmental accounting (EA) has become an essential tool for incorporating environmental costs and performance into corporate reporting and decision-making. This paper analyzes the status of EA in Albania, a developing economy and EU candidate, by evaluating the public disclosure of environmental information and the internal practices of EA within enterprises. A content analysis was performed on the websites and financial reports of 100 big Albanian enterprises, in conjunction with a structured survey of 71 managers. Results indicate a substantial disparity between outward reporting and internal practices. Public environmental disclosures are scant; only a limited number of corporations release quantitative or financial environmental data, and nearly none produce independent sustainability reports, indicating a "gray" reporting environment. Survey results reveal that approximately one-third of organizations have initiated internal enterprise architecture practices or sustainability initiatives, albeit without external communication. Significant obstacles impeding wider implementation of Environmental Accounting (EA) encompass constrained financial resources, absence of regulatory mandates, inadequate stakeholder pressure, and minimal awareness or proficiency in sustainable accounting, literature indicated to be issues prevalent in poor nations. Analyzing the results via stakeholder, legitimacy, and institutional theories indicates that the lack of external pressures and obligatory frameworks has resulted in complacency in disclosure, notwithstanding increasing internal awareness. The research underscores an immediate necessity for enhanced regulatory frameworks, capacity development, and stakeholder involvement in Albania. In aligning with the EU’s CSRD (2022) and global reporting requirements, it is imperative to bridge the divide between public reporting and private practice to enhance corporate transparency and accountability.
Downloads
References
2. Ali, W., Wilson, J., & Husnain, M. (2022). Determinants/Motivations of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Developing Economies: A Survey of the Extant Literature. Sustainability, 14(6), 3474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063474
3. Belal, A. R., & Owen, D. L. (2007). The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: An engagement-based study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 472–494.
4. Belal, A. R. (2015). Social and Environmental Accountability in Developing Countries. Në D. Jamali, C. Karam, & M. Blowfield (Ed.), Development-Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol. 1 (fq. 153–166). Greenleaf Publishing.
5. Boiral, O., Heras‐Saizarbitoria, I., Brotherton, M.-C., & Bernard, J. (2022). Ethical issues in the assurance of sustainability reports: Perspectives from assurance providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(3), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04609-w
6. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
7. Burritt, R. L., & Christ, K. L. (2016). The role of environmental management accounting in the transition to more sustainable business practices. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 4–25.
8. Chang, M., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for organisational social and environmental disclosure in an emerging economy: Evidence from China. Proceedings of the Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting (APIRA) Conference, Sydney.
9. European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council on corporate sustainability reporting (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 322, 15–80.
10. De Silva, T. A., & Nilipour, A. (2024). Is the accounting curricula keeping up with sustainable development? Accounting Education, 1–29.
11. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.
12. Deegan, C. (2013). The accountant will have a central role in saving the planet… really? A reflection on “green accounting and green eyeshades” twenty years later. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7–8), 448–458.
13. Dissanayake, D., Tilt, C., & Xydias-Lobo, M. (2020). Mandatory corporate social responsibility reporting in an emerging economy: The case of the mining sector in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 863–887.
14. Fasua, E. B., & Osifo, E. E. (2020). Environmental accounting and corporate performance: Evidence from the Nigerian oil and gas industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(9), 330–345.
15. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
16. Gray, R. H. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.
17. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
18. Henri, J.-F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80.
19. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2024). Emerging Markets and Sustainability Information: Building Trust in a “Gray Zone”. IFAC Policy Paper.
20. IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. Londër: IFRS Foundation.
21. Jamil, C. Z. M., Mohamed, R., Muhammad, F., & Ali, A. (2014). Environmental management accounting practices in Malaysian SMEs: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Accounting Research (pp. 25–34).
22. Nazari, J. A., Herremans, I. M., & Warsame, H. A. (2015). Sustainability reporting: External motivators and internal facilitators. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 375–390.
23. Qian, W., Rogers, R., & Zollmann, J. (2018). The influence of governance and culture on sustainability reporting in emerging markets. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 15(2), 87–105.
24. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
25. Ali, W., Wilson, J., & Husnain, M. (2022). Determinants/Motivations of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Developing Economies: A Survey of the Extant Literature. Sustainability, 14(6), 3474.
26. Arendt, R., Bachmann, T., Motoshita, M., Bach, V., & Finkbeiner, M. (2020). Comparison of different monetization methods in LCA: A review (Vol. 12). Sustainability.
27. UNCTAD. (2023). Sustainability Reporting in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/topic/sustainability-reporting.
28. Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment. Sage Publishing.
29. Elijido-Ten, E. (2004). Determinantes of environmental disclosures in a developing country: an applicaiton of the stakeholder theory. Swinburne University of Technology.
30. Zatini, G., Della Porta, A., & Za, S. (2023). Deciphering Barriers and Strategies in Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) Adoption: A Comprehensive Two‐Decade Analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
31. Ikram, S., & Khalid, O. (2022). The determinants of environmental accounting practices: Proposal of a theoretical model. Revue du Contrôle de la Comptabilitê et de l'Audit, 6(1), 202-219.
32. Sarkis, J., González-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz , B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. (Vol. 28). Journal of operations management.
33. Alnaim, M., & Metwally, A. (2024). Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting Adoption: Do Environmental Strategy Matter? (Vol. 16). Sustainability.
34. Latif, B., Mahmood, Z., San, O., Said, R., & Bakhsh, A. (2020). Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption. Sustainability.
35. Benvenuto, M., Aufiero, C., & Viola, C. (2023). A systematic literature review on the determinants of sustainability reporting system (Vol. 9). Heliyon.
Copyright (c) 2025 Florinda Zherri, Flutura Kalemi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
