Alternative to the right-hand rule: Farah’s method

  • Mo’ath Farah American International University, Kuwait
Keywords: Farah’s Method, electromagnetism, spatial reasoning, STEM pedagogy, physics education, Cartesian coordinate rotations

Abstract

The right-hand rule (RHR), the conventional tool to establish directions of magnetic field and force in electromagnetism, is hard to use because it involves hand motions and three-dimensional visualization. This paper presents an alternative approach, simply called Farah's Method in this paper, using rotation of Cartesian coordinate axes rather than hand movements, so students can learn it more easily and with less mental burden. In a quasi-experimental study involving 60 secondary school students, we compared Farah's Method to the RHR. Under the Farah's Method condition, there were significantly improved post-test scores (80.47% vs. 61.27%, p < 0.001), better problem-solving accuracy (87.63% vs. 66.87%), and shorter response latencies (35.87 s vs. 53.12 s), and lower self-reported cognitive load (overall rating: 4.31 vs. 3.70). These results draw attention to the method's capacity to simplify vector analysis into concise, significant aspects and foster conceptual understanding. This method is also compatible with learning technologies such as PhET simulations and virtual reality interfaces, where coordinate rotations can be dynamically visualized, making it easier to implement in digital learning environments. This approach has future uses in STEM fields such as mechanics and engineering and offers an accessible, scalable pedagogy for overcoming spatial reasoning obstacles. The research implies that Farah's Method is preferable to the RHR with excellent prospects for revolutionizing electromagnetism teaching via technology-enhanced learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Giancoli, D. (2020). 5th Edition Physics for Scientists and Engineers. U.S.: Pearson Education, Inc.
3. Hegarty, M. (2014, April). Spatial Thinking in Undergraduate Science Education. An Interdisciplinary Journal Spatial Cognition & Computation, 14(2), 142-167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.889696
4. Ling, S. J., Moebs, W., & Sanny, J. (2016). University Physics Volume 2 (Vol. 2). Houston, Texas: OpenStax. Retrieved from https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-2/pages/1-introduction
5. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
6. Serway, R. A., & Jewett Jr, J. W. (2014). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics, Ninth Edition. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
7. Serway, R. A., & Vuille, C. (2013). College Physics, Volume 1, 10th edition. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
8. Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken, Cognitive load theory (pp. 29-47). Cambridge University Press.
9. Young, H. D., Freedman, R. A., & Ford, L. A. (2012). Sears and Zemansky's University Physics: with Modern Physics. 13th edition. San Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc.
Published
2025-05-28
How to Cite
Farah, M. (2025). Alternative to the right-hand rule: Farah’s method. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 41, 479. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/19547
Section
ESI Preprints