Integrated landscapes approaches – How are they defined, conceptualised, configured and operationalised and for what objectives: Perspectives from the four practices of distributed leadership practices?
Keywords:
Strategic Management and Leadership, International Development Financed Projects, Distributed Leadership Practices, Projects Leadership Teams, Integrated trans boundary Landscapes Seascape, Integrated Landscape Approaches
Abstract
While it is widely recognised that integrated landscape approaches are strategic management and leadership strategies used by project team leadership to design, develop and implement projects within integrated transboundary landscapes and seascapes, it is however, less clear how they are defined, conceptualised, configured and operationalised so as to achieve the desired outcomes. This study contributes to knowledge a new configuration and conceptualisation of the integrated transboundary landscapes and seascapes conceptual framework; the four principles of integrated landscape approaches (1) landscape partnership (2) shared understanding (3) vision and planning and (4) taking actions need to be seen as strategic management and leadership objectives of the activity systems. To achieve this, we explore the relationship between four principles of integrated landscape approaches (1) Landscape Partnership (2) Shared Understanding (3)Vision and Planning and (4) Taking Action as strategic management and leadership objectives drawing theoretical foundations from the four widely used distributed leadership practices: engaging leadership practice, developing leadership practice, enabling leadership practice and the empowering leadership practice. Implications for practitioners from the results of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) suggest the existence of a strong relationship between the integrated landscape approaches and the four practices of distributed leadership. It is revealed that (i) they draw from theoretical foundations; (ii) they are independent from one another; (iii) there is a very high level of cross-loading amongst them; (iv) they can be integrated into a form of a network of activity systems; (v) to function effectively and achieve desired outcomes they need to be enacted following an order of primacy; (vi) they are in the form of a normative decisio- making framework.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Adeyanju, S., O’Connor, A., Addoah, T., Bayala, E., Djoudi, H., Moombe, K., Reed, J., Ros-Tonen, M., Siangulube, F., Sikanwe, A., & Sunderland, T. (2021). Learning from Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) in Ghana and Zambia: Lessons for Integrated Landscape Approaches. International Forestry Review, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821833992776
2. Akgunduz, Y., Adan Gök, Ö., & Alkan, C. (2020). The effects of rewards and proactive personality on turnover intentions and meaning of work in hotel businesses. Tourism and Hospitality Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358419841097
3. Akyürek, M. İ., & Akkoyun, M. (2024). Investigation of Distributed Leadership Level of School Administrators. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35207/later.1191336
4. Alnoor, A., & Wah, K. K. (2023). How content factors for the hybrid strategy affect the strategic performance of international oil companies. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2023.129838
5. Altman, E. J., Kiron, D., Jones, R., Cantrell, S., & Hatfield, S. (2023). Workforce Ecosystem Orchestration: A Strategic Framework. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64(3).
6. Angelstam, P., Manton, M., Yamelynets, T., Sørensen, O. J., & Kondrateva (Stepanova), S. V. (2020). Landscape approach towards integrated conservation and use of primeval forests: The transboundary kovda river catchment in russia and Finland. Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9050144
7. Astudillo, M. V., Martín-García, A. V., & Acuña, J. O. (2020). Activity theory: Fundamentals for study and design of blended learning. Cadernos de Pesquisa. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147127
8. Augustsson, D. (2021). Expansive learning in a change laboratory intervention for teachers. Journal of Educational Change, 22(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10833-020-09404-0/FIGURES/8
9. Bäcklander, G. (2019). Doing complexity leadership theory: How agile coaches at Spotify practise enabling leadership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12303
10. Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress and Coping. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
11. Beck & Cowan, C., D. (1995). Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change. Developmental Management.
12. Bennett, N. J., Dodge, M., Akre, T. S., Canty, S. W. J., Chiaravalloti, R., Dayer, A. A., Deichmann, J. L., Gill, D., McField, M., McNamara, J., Murphy, S. E., Nowakowski, A. J., & Songer, M. (2022). Social science for conservation in working landscapes and seascapes. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.954930
13. Bollen, K. A., Lilly, A. G., & Luo, L. (2022). Selecting Scaling Indicators in Structural Equation Models (SEMs). Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000530
14. Bolton, K. W., Hall, J. C., & Lehmann, P. (2021). Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice: A generalist-eclectic approach: Fourth edition. In Theoretical Perspectives for Direct Social Work Practice: A Generalist-Eclectic Approach: Fourth Edition. Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826165565
15. Brown, C., Flood, J., Armstrong, P., MacGregor, S., & Chinas, C. (2020). Is distributed leadership an effective approach for mobilising professional capital across professional learning networks? Exploring a case from England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-02-2020-0010
16. Bryant, D. A., & Walker, A. (2024). Principal-designed structures that enhance middle leaders’ professional learning. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221084154
17. Burner, T., & Svendsen, B. (2020). Activity Theory—Lev Vygotsky, Aleksei Leont’ev, Yrjö Engeström. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_21
18. Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
19. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993a). Relationships Between Work Group Characteristics and effectiveness: Work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46.
20. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993b). Relationships Between Work Group Characteristics and effectiveness: Work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–851.
21. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x
22. Campion, M. C., Schepker, D. J., Campion, M. A., & Sanchez, J. I. (2020). Competency modeling: A theoretical and empirical examination of the strategy dissemination process. Human Resource Management, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21994
23. Carroll, P., & Kellow, A. (2021). The OECD: A decade of transformation: 2011-2021. In The OECD: A Decade of Transformation: 2011-2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110735833
24. Cheng, A. S., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). Developing a meta-inventory of human values. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701232
25. Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.006
26. Christensen-Salem, A., Walumbwa, F. O., Hsu, C. I. C., Misati, E., Babalola, M. T., & Kim, K. (2020). Unmasking the creative self-efficacy–creative performance relationship: the roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1710721
27. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. In Distributed cognitions : Psychological and educational considerations.
28. Compensation package of international assignees. (2020). In The Routledge Companion to International Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761282-28
29. Ealy, P. L. (2024). DEVELOPING LEADERSHIP SKILLS. In Building An Organizational Coaching Culture: Creating Effective Environments for Growth and Success in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003379577-15
30. Echebiri, C. K. (2020). An empirical study into the individual-level antecedents to employee-driven innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1367
31. Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143
32. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
33. Engeström, Y. (2012). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
34. Engeström, Y., & Pyörälä, E. (2021). Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Medical Teacher, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105
35. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2020). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
36. England, G. W. (1967). Personal Value Systems of American Managers*. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/255244
37. Enz, C. A. (1988). The Role of Value Congruity in Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393060
38. Enz, C. A. (1989). The relationship between organizational value sharing and influence over strategic decisions. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01714972
39. Evans, K., Meli, P., Zamora-Cristales, R., Schweizer, D., Méndez-Toribio, M., Gómez-Ruiz, P. A., & Guariguata, M. R. (2023). Drivers of success in collaborative monitoring in forest landscape restoration: an indicative assessment from Latin America. Restoration Ecology, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13803
40. Feng, Y., Hao, B., Iles, P., & Bown, N. (2017a). Rethinking distributed leadership: dimensions, antecedents and team effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0147
41. Feng, Y., Hao, B., Iles, P., & Bown, N. (2017b). Rethinking distributed leadership: dimensions, antecedents and team effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0147
42. Forbes, J. (2008). Reflexivity in professional doctoral research. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802431523
43. Giesenbauer, B., Tegeler, M. K., & Müller-Christ, G. (2021). From energy efficiency to stakeholder involvement and beyond? Case study on the advancement of sustainable development at the University of Bremen. In Managing Social Responsibility in Universities: Organisational Responses to Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70013-3_5
44. Grabner, I., Klein, A., & Speckbacher, G. (2022). Managing the trade-off between autonomy and task interdependence in creative teams: The role of organizational-level cultural control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101347
45. Graves, C. W. (1966). Deterioration of Work Standards. Harvard Business Review, 44(5).
46. Graves, C. W. (1970). Levels of Existence: An Open System Theory of Values. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 10(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216787001000205
47. Graves, C. W. (1974). Human Nature Prepares for a Momentous Leap. In Futurist.
48. Gronn, P. (2016). Fit for purpose no more? Management in Education, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665062
49. Grošelj, M., Černe, M., Penger, S., & Grah, B. (2020). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0294
50. Hagemann, V., Ontrup, G., & Kluge, A. (2020). Collective orientation and its implications for coordination and team performance in interdependent work contexts. Team Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2020-0020
51. Hairon, S., & Goh, J. wp. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership:Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
52. Hairon, S., & wp Goh, J. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership:Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
53. Hamzeh, N. (2023). Female Leaders and Distributed Leadership: What Can Women Bring to the Table? Open Journal of Leadership, 12(01). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2023.121002
54. Hangartner, J., & Svaton, C. J. (2022). Distributed Leadership, Teacher Autonomy, and Power Relations Between Headteachers and Teachers Under Low-Stakes Accountability Conditions: An Ethnographic Account from Switzerland. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1063609
55. Harris, A., Ismail, N., & Jones, M. (2023). Distributed leadership: taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.05022-3
56. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School Leadership and Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620
57. Hayes, A. (2022). How Stratified Random Sampling Works, with Examples. Financial Analysis.
58. Hite, R. L., Childers, G. M., & Hoffman, J. (2024). Cultural–Historical Activity Theory as an integrative model of socioscientific issue based learning in museums using extended reality technologies. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2024.2324854
59. Hu L., & Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1).
60. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
61. Humphreys, D. M., & Rigg, C. (2020). The inseparable connection between leadership, agency, power and collaboration in a primary educational setting. Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020931285
62. Humphreys, J. H., Novicevic, M. M., Pane Haden, S. S., & Hasan, M. K. (2020). Enabling leadership: Whitney Young, Jr as dramaturgical director of the US civil rights movement. Journal of Management History, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-06-2020-0041
63. Iles, P., & Feng, Y. (2011). Distributed leadership, knowledge and information management and team performance in Chinese and Western groups. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771111105640
64. Irvine, J. (2021). Distributed Leadership in Practice : A Modified Delphi Method Study. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 25.
65. Jambo, D., & Hongde, L. (2020). The effect of principal’s distributed leadership practice on students’ academic achievement: A systematic review of the literature. In International Journal of Higher Education (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p189
66. Jennings, G. R. (2012). Qualitative research methods. In Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001295
67. Jung, S. B., & Sheldon, S. (2020). Connecting Dimensions of School Leadership for Partnerships with School and Teacher Practices of Family Engagement. School Community Journal.
68. Karani, P., & Failler, P. (2020). Comparative coastal and marine tourism, climate change, and the blue economy in African Large Marine Ecosystems. Environmental Development, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100572
69. Knezović, E., & Drkić, A. (2020). Innovative work behavior in SMEs: the role of transformational leadership. Employee Relations. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2020-0124
70. Kohnen, D., De Witte, H., Schaufeli, W. B., Dello, S., Bruyneel, L., & Sermeus, W. (2024). Engaging leadership and nurse well-being: the role of the work environment and work motivation—a cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00886-6
71. Kustanto, H., Hamidah, Eliyana, A., Mumpuni, J. H. S., & Gunawan, D. R. (2020). The moderation role of psychological empowerment on innovative work behaviour. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.8.38
72. Lázaro, S. M., Del Barco, B. L., Polo-Del-Río, M. I., & Rasskin-Gutman, I. (2020). Predictive factors of task interdependence in the university context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010100
73. Lebovic, H. (2013). Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber. Integral Review, 9(1).
74. Lémonie, Y., Grosstephan, V., & Tomás, J. L. (2021). From a Sociological Given Context to Changing Practice: Transforming Problematic Power Relations in Educational Organizations to Overcome Social Inequalities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3640. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.608502/BIBTEX
75. Lin, Q. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher innovativeness: Mediating roles of teacher autonomy and professional collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948152
76. Liu, P. (2020). Motivating teachers’ commitment to change through distributed leadership in Chinese urban primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2019-0431
77. Liu, Y. (2021). Distributed leadership practices and student science performance through the four-path model: examining failure in underprivileged schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0159
78. Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The Effect of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Teacher Self-efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Roles of Supportive School Culture and Teacher Collaboration. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
79. Lopes, M. G. R., Vilela, R. A. de G., Silva-Macaia, A. A., Guirado, V. M. de P., & Querol, M. A. P. (2020). Learning Platforms for Implementing Formative Interventions to Promote the Health and Safety of Workers in Brazil. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.619593
80. Lopes, M. G. R., Vilela, R. A. de G., Silva-Macaia, A. A., Guirado, V. M. de P., & Querol, M. A. P. (2021). Learning Platforms for Implementing Formative Interventions to Promote the Health and Safety of Workers in Brazil. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.619593/FULL
81. Lusiani, M., & Langley, A. (2019). The social construction of strategic coherence: Practices of enabling leadership. Long Range Planning, 52(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.006
82. Lynn, P. (2019). The advantage and disadvantage of implicitly stratified sampling. Methods, Data, Analyses, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.02
83. M.A., C., A.A., F., B.J., R., L., C., G.M., P., & R.B., O. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1).
84. Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Langston, J. D., Riggs, R. A., Sari, D. A., Sarkar, S., Sayer, J. A., Supriatna, J., & Winarni, N. L. (2020). Transdisciplinary science for improved conservation outcomes. In Environmental Conservation (Vol. 47, Issue 4, pp. 224–233). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892920000338
85. Marinov, M. A. (2023). Virtual teams across national borders. In Virtual Teams Across National Borders. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003398745
86. Mawdsley, E., & Taggart, J. (2022). Rethinking d/Development. Progress in Human Geography, 46(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211053115
87. McCauley, C. D., & Palus, C. J. (2020). Developing the theory and practice of leadership development: A relational view. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101456
88. McGonigle, D. F., Rota Nodari, G., Phillips, R. L., Aynekulu, E., Estrada-Carmona, N., Jones, S. K., Koziell, I., Luedeling, E., Remans, R., Shepherd, K., Wiberg, D., Whitney, C., & Zhang, W. (2020). A Knowledge Brokering Framework for Integrated Landscape Management. In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00013
89. McGuinness, S. J., & Taysum, A. (2020). Distributed leadership to enhance participation in school processes and practices to improve learning: A northern irish faith secondary school case-study. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2020-1-9
90. Merk, J., Schlotz, W., & Falter, T. (2017). The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric analysis using a forced choice thurstonian IRT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP), 1626. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.01626/BIBTEX
91. Meuris, J., & Elias, A. (2022). Task interdependence and the gender wage gap: The role of the gender composition of an occupation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2677
92. Mifsud, D. (2023). A systematic review of school distributed leadership: exploring research purposes, concepts and approaches in the field between 2010 and 2022. Journal of Educational Administration and History. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2158181
93. Mifsud, D. (2024). A systematic review of school distributed leadership: exploring research purposes, concepts and approaches in the field between 2010 and 2022. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2158181
94. Modeste, M. E., Hornskov, S. B., Bjerg, H., & Kelley, C. J. (2020). School leadership practice across international policy contexts: Organizational roles and distributed leadership in Denmark and the United States. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218807489
95. Nolan, A. J., Russell, J. L., Pickard, A. C., & Beasley, R. (2015). One Size Fits All?: A model of human growth and its application to systems thinking. INCOSE International Symposium, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2015.00072.x
96. Nykyforchyn, M. (2022). TECHNOLOGY OF SPIRAL DYNAMICS IN THE CONTEXT OF DETERMINING THE DETERMINANTS OF STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(44). https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.44.2022.3711
97. Okpala, P. (2020). Increasing access to primary health care through distributed leadership. International Journal of Healthcare Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1719463
98. Oliver, B. L. (1999). Comparing corporate managers’ personal values over three decades, 1967-1995. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006196927745
99. Omar, N. A. (2020). Mapping Leadership: The Tasks that Matter for Improving Teaching and Learning in Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1696373
100. Pahi, M. H., Ahmed, U., Imroz, S. M., Shah, S. M. M., & Yong, I. S. C. (2024). The flexible HRM and firm performance nexus: can empowering leadership play any contingent role? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0360
101. Pardo Martínez, C. I., & Cotte Poveda, A. (2022). Strategies to improve sustainability: An analysis of 120 microenterprises in an emerging economy. Global Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.3
102. Pedroza-Arceo, N. M., Weber, N., & Ortega-Argueta, A. (2022). A Knowledge Review on Integrated Landscape Approaches. In Forests (Vol. 13, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020312
103. Printy, S., & Liu, Y. (2020). Distributed Leadership Globally: The Interactive Nature of Principal and Teacher Leadership in 32 Countries. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20926548
104. Publications, S., Bennis, W. G., Katz, D., Kahn, R. L., Mcgeown, A. V, Publications, S., Briefer, E. F., Mandel, R., Maigrot, A., Freymond, S. B., House, R. J., Rizzo, J. R., Ingram, Baum, Winter, S. G., Galbraith, J. A. Y. R., Bandura, A., Ford, J. D., Slocum, J. W., … Thompson, V. A. (2016). Dimensions of Teacher Innovativeness Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : Dimensions of Teacher Innovativeness. Organization Science, 14(1).
105. R.L., O. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63(Special Issue).
106. Rahmadani, V. G., Schaufeli, W. B., Stouten, J., Zhang, Z., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2020). Engaging leadership and its implication for work engagement and job outcomes at the individual and team level: A multi-level longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030776
107. Reed, J., Chervier, C., Borah, J. R., Gumbo, D., Moombe, K. B., Mbanga, T. M., O’Connor, A., Siangulube, F., Yanou, M., & Sunderland, T. (2023). Co-producing theory of change to operationalize integrated landscape approaches. Sustainability Science, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01190-3
108. Reed, J., Ickowitz, A., Chervier, C., Djoudi, H., Moombe, K., Ros-Tonen, M., Yanou, M., Yuliani, L., & Sunderland, T. (2020). Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104822
109. Riggs, R. A., Achdiawan, R., Adiwinata, A., Boedhihartono, A. K., Kastanya, A., Langston, J. D., Priyadi, H., Ruiz-Pérez, M., Sayer, J., & Tjiu, A. (2021). Governing the landscape: potential and challenges of integrated approaches to landscape sustainability in Indonesia. Landscape Ecology, 36(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01255-1
110. Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Ortiz-Marcos, I., Díaz-Barcos, V., & Lozano, S. A. (2020). Applying the strategic prospective approach to project management in a development project in Colombia. International Journal of Project Management, 38(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.003
111. Sannino, A. (2020). Enacting the utopia of eradicating homelessness: toward a new generation of activity-theoretical studies of learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1725459
112. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono, A. K., Day, M., Garcia, C., Van Oosten, C., & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 110, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210595110
113. Schulze, J. H., & Pinkow, F. (2020). Leadership for Organisational Adaptability: How Enabling Leaders Create Adaptive Space. Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030037
114. Scott, E. D. (2002). ORGANIZATIONAL MORAL VALUES Elizabeth D. Scott. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 33–55.
115. Shadnam, M., Bykov, A., & Prasad, A. (2021). Opening Constructive Dialogues Between Business Ethics Research and the Sociology of Morality: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 170, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04638-7
116. Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. In Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357
117. Snihur, Y., & Bocken, N. (2022). A call for action: The impact of business model innovation on business ecosystems, society and planet. Long Range Planning, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102182
118. Spante, M., Garraway, J., Winberg, C., Nofemela, F., & Duma, T. P. (2023). Cultural Historical Activity Theory as a tool for reimagining WIL: Conducting contradiction analysis workshops and the implications for Change Laboratory work. Bureau de Change Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.21428/3033cbff.bd519e76
119. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
120. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030003023
121. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004a). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Journal of Curriculum Studies (Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp. 3–34). https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
122. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004b). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Journal of Curriculum Studies (Vol. 36, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
123. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2006). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Rethinking Schooling: Twenty-Five Years of the Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963180
124. Spinuzzi, C. (2020). “Trying to predict the future”: third-generation activity theory’s codesign orientation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1660790
125. Tang, S., Zhang, G., & Wang, H. J. (2020). Daily empowering leadership and job crafting: Examining moderators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165756
126. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
127. van Rensburg, J. J., Santos, C. M., & de Jong, S. B. (2023). Sharing time and goals in dyads: how shared tenure and goal interdependence influence perceived shared mental models. Team Performance Management, 29(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086
128. van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., van Rhenen, W., & Kuiper, R. M. (2020). Business results and well-being: An engaging leadership intervention study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124515
129. Vongswasdi, P., Leroy, H., Claeys, J., Anisman-Razin, M., & van Dierendonck, D. (2024). Beyond Developing Leaders: Toward a Multinarrative Understanding of the Value of Leadership Development Programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2021.0231
130. Wang, C. J. (2024). From empowering leadership to proactive work behavior in hospitality: a study of multiple cross-level mediation processes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-11-2022-0547
131. Wang, C., & Yu, G. (2016). The value system characteristics of Chinese online game players. Entertainment Computing, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.04.003
132. Welling, R., Filz, P., Dalton, J., Smith, D. M., de Silva, J., & Manyara, P. (2021). Governing resilient landscapes across the source-to-sea continuum. Water International, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1890964
133. Wilson, K. (2018). Collaborative leadership in public library service development. Library Management, 39(8–9). https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-08-2017-0084
134. Wong, S. I., & van Gils, S. (2022). Initiated and received task interdependence and distributed team performance: the mediating roles of different forms of role clarity. AI and Society, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01241-w
135. Woods, P. A., Roberts, A., Jarvis, J., & Culshaw, S. (2020). Autonomy, leadership and leadership development in England’s school system. School Leadership and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811661
136. Y. Engestrom. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. In Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
137. Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492
2. Akgunduz, Y., Adan Gök, Ö., & Alkan, C. (2020). The effects of rewards and proactive personality on turnover intentions and meaning of work in hotel businesses. Tourism and Hospitality Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358419841097
3. Akyürek, M. İ., & Akkoyun, M. (2024). Investigation of Distributed Leadership Level of School Administrators. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35207/later.1191336
4. Alnoor, A., & Wah, K. K. (2023). How content factors for the hybrid strategy affect the strategic performance of international oil companies. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2023.129838
5. Altman, E. J., Kiron, D., Jones, R., Cantrell, S., & Hatfield, S. (2023). Workforce Ecosystem Orchestration: A Strategic Framework. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64(3).
6. Angelstam, P., Manton, M., Yamelynets, T., Sørensen, O. J., & Kondrateva (Stepanova), S. V. (2020). Landscape approach towards integrated conservation and use of primeval forests: The transboundary kovda river catchment in russia and Finland. Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9050144
7. Astudillo, M. V., Martín-García, A. V., & Acuña, J. O. (2020). Activity theory: Fundamentals for study and design of blended learning. Cadernos de Pesquisa. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147127
8. Augustsson, D. (2021). Expansive learning in a change laboratory intervention for teachers. Journal of Educational Change, 22(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10833-020-09404-0/FIGURES/8
9. Bäcklander, G. (2019). Doing complexity leadership theory: How agile coaches at Spotify practise enabling leadership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12303
10. Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress and Coping. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
11. Beck & Cowan, C., D. (1995). Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change. Developmental Management.
12. Bennett, N. J., Dodge, M., Akre, T. S., Canty, S. W. J., Chiaravalloti, R., Dayer, A. A., Deichmann, J. L., Gill, D., McField, M., McNamara, J., Murphy, S. E., Nowakowski, A. J., & Songer, M. (2022). Social science for conservation in working landscapes and seascapes. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.954930
13. Bollen, K. A., Lilly, A. G., & Luo, L. (2022). Selecting Scaling Indicators in Structural Equation Models (SEMs). Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000530
14. Bolton, K. W., Hall, J. C., & Lehmann, P. (2021). Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice: A generalist-eclectic approach: Fourth edition. In Theoretical Perspectives for Direct Social Work Practice: A Generalist-Eclectic Approach: Fourth Edition. Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826165565
15. Brown, C., Flood, J., Armstrong, P., MacGregor, S., & Chinas, C. (2020). Is distributed leadership an effective approach for mobilising professional capital across professional learning networks? Exploring a case from England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-02-2020-0010
16. Bryant, D. A., & Walker, A. (2024). Principal-designed structures that enhance middle leaders’ professional learning. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221084154
17. Burner, T., & Svendsen, B. (2020). Activity Theory—Lev Vygotsky, Aleksei Leont’ev, Yrjö Engeström. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_21
18. Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
19. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993a). Relationships Between Work Group Characteristics and effectiveness: Work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46.
20. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993b). Relationships Between Work Group Characteristics and effectiveness: Work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–851.
21. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x
22. Campion, M. C., Schepker, D. J., Campion, M. A., & Sanchez, J. I. (2020). Competency modeling: A theoretical and empirical examination of the strategy dissemination process. Human Resource Management, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21994
23. Carroll, P., & Kellow, A. (2021). The OECD: A decade of transformation: 2011-2021. In The OECD: A Decade of Transformation: 2011-2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110735833
24. Cheng, A. S., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). Developing a meta-inventory of human values. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701232
25. Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.006
26. Christensen-Salem, A., Walumbwa, F. O., Hsu, C. I. C., Misati, E., Babalola, M. T., & Kim, K. (2020). Unmasking the creative self-efficacy–creative performance relationship: the roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1710721
27. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. In Distributed cognitions : Psychological and educational considerations.
28. Compensation package of international assignees. (2020). In The Routledge Companion to International Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761282-28
29. Ealy, P. L. (2024). DEVELOPING LEADERSHIP SKILLS. In Building An Organizational Coaching Culture: Creating Effective Environments for Growth and Success in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003379577-15
30. Echebiri, C. K. (2020). An empirical study into the individual-level antecedents to employee-driven innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1367
31. Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143
32. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
33. Engeström, Y. (2012). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
34. Engeström, Y., & Pyörälä, E. (2021). Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Medical Teacher, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105
35. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2020). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
36. England, G. W. (1967). Personal Value Systems of American Managers*. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/255244
37. Enz, C. A. (1988). The Role of Value Congruity in Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393060
38. Enz, C. A. (1989). The relationship between organizational value sharing and influence over strategic decisions. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01714972
39. Evans, K., Meli, P., Zamora-Cristales, R., Schweizer, D., Méndez-Toribio, M., Gómez-Ruiz, P. A., & Guariguata, M. R. (2023). Drivers of success in collaborative monitoring in forest landscape restoration: an indicative assessment from Latin America. Restoration Ecology, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13803
40. Feng, Y., Hao, B., Iles, P., & Bown, N. (2017a). Rethinking distributed leadership: dimensions, antecedents and team effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0147
41. Feng, Y., Hao, B., Iles, P., & Bown, N. (2017b). Rethinking distributed leadership: dimensions, antecedents and team effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0147
42. Forbes, J. (2008). Reflexivity in professional doctoral research. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802431523
43. Giesenbauer, B., Tegeler, M. K., & Müller-Christ, G. (2021). From energy efficiency to stakeholder involvement and beyond? Case study on the advancement of sustainable development at the University of Bremen. In Managing Social Responsibility in Universities: Organisational Responses to Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70013-3_5
44. Grabner, I., Klein, A., & Speckbacher, G. (2022). Managing the trade-off between autonomy and task interdependence in creative teams: The role of organizational-level cultural control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101347
45. Graves, C. W. (1966). Deterioration of Work Standards. Harvard Business Review, 44(5).
46. Graves, C. W. (1970). Levels of Existence: An Open System Theory of Values. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 10(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216787001000205
47. Graves, C. W. (1974). Human Nature Prepares for a Momentous Leap. In Futurist.
48. Gronn, P. (2016). Fit for purpose no more? Management in Education, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665062
49. Grošelj, M., Černe, M., Penger, S., & Grah, B. (2020). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0294
50. Hagemann, V., Ontrup, G., & Kluge, A. (2020). Collective orientation and its implications for coordination and team performance in interdependent work contexts. Team Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2020-0020
51. Hairon, S., & Goh, J. wp. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership:Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
52. Hairon, S., & wp Goh, J. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership:Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
53. Hamzeh, N. (2023). Female Leaders and Distributed Leadership: What Can Women Bring to the Table? Open Journal of Leadership, 12(01). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2023.121002
54. Hangartner, J., & Svaton, C. J. (2022). Distributed Leadership, Teacher Autonomy, and Power Relations Between Headteachers and Teachers Under Low-Stakes Accountability Conditions: An Ethnographic Account from Switzerland. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1063609
55. Harris, A., Ismail, N., & Jones, M. (2023). Distributed leadership: taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.05022-3
56. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School Leadership and Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620
57. Hayes, A. (2022). How Stratified Random Sampling Works, with Examples. Financial Analysis.
58. Hite, R. L., Childers, G. M., & Hoffman, J. (2024). Cultural–Historical Activity Theory as an integrative model of socioscientific issue based learning in museums using extended reality technologies. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2024.2324854
59. Hu L., & Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1).
60. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
61. Humphreys, D. M., & Rigg, C. (2020). The inseparable connection between leadership, agency, power and collaboration in a primary educational setting. Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020931285
62. Humphreys, J. H., Novicevic, M. M., Pane Haden, S. S., & Hasan, M. K. (2020). Enabling leadership: Whitney Young, Jr as dramaturgical director of the US civil rights movement. Journal of Management History, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-06-2020-0041
63. Iles, P., & Feng, Y. (2011). Distributed leadership, knowledge and information management and team performance in Chinese and Western groups. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771111105640
64. Irvine, J. (2021). Distributed Leadership in Practice : A Modified Delphi Method Study. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 25.
65. Jambo, D., & Hongde, L. (2020). The effect of principal’s distributed leadership practice on students’ academic achievement: A systematic review of the literature. In International Journal of Higher Education (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p189
66. Jennings, G. R. (2012). Qualitative research methods. In Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001295
67. Jung, S. B., & Sheldon, S. (2020). Connecting Dimensions of School Leadership for Partnerships with School and Teacher Practices of Family Engagement. School Community Journal.
68. Karani, P., & Failler, P. (2020). Comparative coastal and marine tourism, climate change, and the blue economy in African Large Marine Ecosystems. Environmental Development, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100572
69. Knezović, E., & Drkić, A. (2020). Innovative work behavior in SMEs: the role of transformational leadership. Employee Relations. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2020-0124
70. Kohnen, D., De Witte, H., Schaufeli, W. B., Dello, S., Bruyneel, L., & Sermeus, W. (2024). Engaging leadership and nurse well-being: the role of the work environment and work motivation—a cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00886-6
71. Kustanto, H., Hamidah, Eliyana, A., Mumpuni, J. H. S., & Gunawan, D. R. (2020). The moderation role of psychological empowerment on innovative work behaviour. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.8.38
72. Lázaro, S. M., Del Barco, B. L., Polo-Del-Río, M. I., & Rasskin-Gutman, I. (2020). Predictive factors of task interdependence in the university context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010100
73. Lebovic, H. (2013). Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber. Integral Review, 9(1).
74. Lémonie, Y., Grosstephan, V., & Tomás, J. L. (2021). From a Sociological Given Context to Changing Practice: Transforming Problematic Power Relations in Educational Organizations to Overcome Social Inequalities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3640. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.608502/BIBTEX
75. Lin, Q. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher innovativeness: Mediating roles of teacher autonomy and professional collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948152
76. Liu, P. (2020). Motivating teachers’ commitment to change through distributed leadership in Chinese urban primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2019-0431
77. Liu, Y. (2021). Distributed leadership practices and student science performance through the four-path model: examining failure in underprivileged schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0159
78. Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The Effect of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Teacher Self-efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Roles of Supportive School Culture and Teacher Collaboration. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
79. Lopes, M. G. R., Vilela, R. A. de G., Silva-Macaia, A. A., Guirado, V. M. de P., & Querol, M. A. P. (2020). Learning Platforms for Implementing Formative Interventions to Promote the Health and Safety of Workers in Brazil. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.619593
80. Lopes, M. G. R., Vilela, R. A. de G., Silva-Macaia, A. A., Guirado, V. M. de P., & Querol, M. A. P. (2021). Learning Platforms for Implementing Formative Interventions to Promote the Health and Safety of Workers in Brazil. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.619593/FULL
81. Lusiani, M., & Langley, A. (2019). The social construction of strategic coherence: Practices of enabling leadership. Long Range Planning, 52(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.006
82. Lynn, P. (2019). The advantage and disadvantage of implicitly stratified sampling. Methods, Data, Analyses, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.02
83. M.A., C., A.A., F., B.J., R., L., C., G.M., P., & R.B., O. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1).
84. Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Langston, J. D., Riggs, R. A., Sari, D. A., Sarkar, S., Sayer, J. A., Supriatna, J., & Winarni, N. L. (2020). Transdisciplinary science for improved conservation outcomes. In Environmental Conservation (Vol. 47, Issue 4, pp. 224–233). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892920000338
85. Marinov, M. A. (2023). Virtual teams across national borders. In Virtual Teams Across National Borders. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003398745
86. Mawdsley, E., & Taggart, J. (2022). Rethinking d/Development. Progress in Human Geography, 46(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211053115
87. McCauley, C. D., & Palus, C. J. (2020). Developing the theory and practice of leadership development: A relational view. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101456
88. McGonigle, D. F., Rota Nodari, G., Phillips, R. L., Aynekulu, E., Estrada-Carmona, N., Jones, S. K., Koziell, I., Luedeling, E., Remans, R., Shepherd, K., Wiberg, D., Whitney, C., & Zhang, W. (2020). A Knowledge Brokering Framework for Integrated Landscape Management. In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00013
89. McGuinness, S. J., & Taysum, A. (2020). Distributed leadership to enhance participation in school processes and practices to improve learning: A northern irish faith secondary school case-study. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2020-1-9
90. Merk, J., Schlotz, W., & Falter, T. (2017). The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric analysis using a forced choice thurstonian IRT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP), 1626. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.01626/BIBTEX
91. Meuris, J., & Elias, A. (2022). Task interdependence and the gender wage gap: The role of the gender composition of an occupation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2677
92. Mifsud, D. (2023). A systematic review of school distributed leadership: exploring research purposes, concepts and approaches in the field between 2010 and 2022. Journal of Educational Administration and History. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2158181
93. Mifsud, D. (2024). A systematic review of school distributed leadership: exploring research purposes, concepts and approaches in the field between 2010 and 2022. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2158181
94. Modeste, M. E., Hornskov, S. B., Bjerg, H., & Kelley, C. J. (2020). School leadership practice across international policy contexts: Organizational roles and distributed leadership in Denmark and the United States. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218807489
95. Nolan, A. J., Russell, J. L., Pickard, A. C., & Beasley, R. (2015). One Size Fits All?: A model of human growth and its application to systems thinking. INCOSE International Symposium, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2015.00072.x
96. Nykyforchyn, M. (2022). TECHNOLOGY OF SPIRAL DYNAMICS IN THE CONTEXT OF DETERMINING THE DETERMINANTS OF STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(44). https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.44.2022.3711
97. Okpala, P. (2020). Increasing access to primary health care through distributed leadership. International Journal of Healthcare Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1719463
98. Oliver, B. L. (1999). Comparing corporate managers’ personal values over three decades, 1967-1995. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006196927745
99. Omar, N. A. (2020). Mapping Leadership: The Tasks that Matter for Improving Teaching and Learning in Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1696373
100. Pahi, M. H., Ahmed, U., Imroz, S. M., Shah, S. M. M., & Yong, I. S. C. (2024). The flexible HRM and firm performance nexus: can empowering leadership play any contingent role? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0360
101. Pardo Martínez, C. I., & Cotte Poveda, A. (2022). Strategies to improve sustainability: An analysis of 120 microenterprises in an emerging economy. Global Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.3
102. Pedroza-Arceo, N. M., Weber, N., & Ortega-Argueta, A. (2022). A Knowledge Review on Integrated Landscape Approaches. In Forests (Vol. 13, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020312
103. Printy, S., & Liu, Y. (2020). Distributed Leadership Globally: The Interactive Nature of Principal and Teacher Leadership in 32 Countries. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20926548
104. Publications, S., Bennis, W. G., Katz, D., Kahn, R. L., Mcgeown, A. V, Publications, S., Briefer, E. F., Mandel, R., Maigrot, A., Freymond, S. B., House, R. J., Rizzo, J. R., Ingram, Baum, Winter, S. G., Galbraith, J. A. Y. R., Bandura, A., Ford, J. D., Slocum, J. W., … Thompson, V. A. (2016). Dimensions of Teacher Innovativeness Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : Dimensions of Teacher Innovativeness. Organization Science, 14(1).
105. R.L., O. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63(Special Issue).
106. Rahmadani, V. G., Schaufeli, W. B., Stouten, J., Zhang, Z., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2020). Engaging leadership and its implication for work engagement and job outcomes at the individual and team level: A multi-level longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030776
107. Reed, J., Chervier, C., Borah, J. R., Gumbo, D., Moombe, K. B., Mbanga, T. M., O’Connor, A., Siangulube, F., Yanou, M., & Sunderland, T. (2023). Co-producing theory of change to operationalize integrated landscape approaches. Sustainability Science, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01190-3
108. Reed, J., Ickowitz, A., Chervier, C., Djoudi, H., Moombe, K., Ros-Tonen, M., Yanou, M., Yuliani, L., & Sunderland, T. (2020). Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104822
109. Riggs, R. A., Achdiawan, R., Adiwinata, A., Boedhihartono, A. K., Kastanya, A., Langston, J. D., Priyadi, H., Ruiz-Pérez, M., Sayer, J., & Tjiu, A. (2021). Governing the landscape: potential and challenges of integrated approaches to landscape sustainability in Indonesia. Landscape Ecology, 36(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01255-1
110. Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Ortiz-Marcos, I., Díaz-Barcos, V., & Lozano, S. A. (2020). Applying the strategic prospective approach to project management in a development project in Colombia. International Journal of Project Management, 38(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.003
111. Sannino, A. (2020). Enacting the utopia of eradicating homelessness: toward a new generation of activity-theoretical studies of learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1725459
112. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono, A. K., Day, M., Garcia, C., Van Oosten, C., & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 110, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210595110
113. Schulze, J. H., & Pinkow, F. (2020). Leadership for Organisational Adaptability: How Enabling Leaders Create Adaptive Space. Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030037
114. Scott, E. D. (2002). ORGANIZATIONAL MORAL VALUES Elizabeth D. Scott. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 33–55.
115. Shadnam, M., Bykov, A., & Prasad, A. (2021). Opening Constructive Dialogues Between Business Ethics Research and the Sociology of Morality: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 170, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04638-7
116. Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. In Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357
117. Snihur, Y., & Bocken, N. (2022). A call for action: The impact of business model innovation on business ecosystems, society and planet. Long Range Planning, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102182
118. Spante, M., Garraway, J., Winberg, C., Nofemela, F., & Duma, T. P. (2023). Cultural Historical Activity Theory as a tool for reimagining WIL: Conducting contradiction analysis workshops and the implications for Change Laboratory work. Bureau de Change Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.21428/3033cbff.bd519e76
119. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
120. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030003023
121. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004a). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Journal of Curriculum Studies (Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp. 3–34). https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
122. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004b). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Journal of Curriculum Studies (Vol. 36, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
123. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2006). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Rethinking Schooling: Twenty-Five Years of the Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963180
124. Spinuzzi, C. (2020). “Trying to predict the future”: third-generation activity theory’s codesign orientation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1660790
125. Tang, S., Zhang, G., & Wang, H. J. (2020). Daily empowering leadership and job crafting: Examining moderators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165756
126. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
127. van Rensburg, J. J., Santos, C. M., & de Jong, S. B. (2023). Sharing time and goals in dyads: how shared tenure and goal interdependence influence perceived shared mental models. Team Performance Management, 29(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086
128. van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., van Rhenen, W., & Kuiper, R. M. (2020). Business results and well-being: An engaging leadership intervention study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124515
129. Vongswasdi, P., Leroy, H., Claeys, J., Anisman-Razin, M., & van Dierendonck, D. (2024). Beyond Developing Leaders: Toward a Multinarrative Understanding of the Value of Leadership Development Programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2021.0231
130. Wang, C. J. (2024). From empowering leadership to proactive work behavior in hospitality: a study of multiple cross-level mediation processes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-11-2022-0547
131. Wang, C., & Yu, G. (2016). The value system characteristics of Chinese online game players. Entertainment Computing, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.04.003
132. Welling, R., Filz, P., Dalton, J., Smith, D. M., de Silva, J., & Manyara, P. (2021). Governing resilient landscapes across the source-to-sea continuum. Water International, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.1890964
133. Wilson, K. (2018). Collaborative leadership in public library service development. Library Management, 39(8–9). https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-08-2017-0084
134. Wong, S. I., & van Gils, S. (2022). Initiated and received task interdependence and distributed team performance: the mediating roles of different forms of role clarity. AI and Society, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01241-w
135. Woods, P. A., Roberts, A., Jarvis, J., & Culshaw, S. (2020). Autonomy, leadership and leadership development in England’s school system. School Leadership and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811661
136. Y. Engestrom. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. In Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
137. Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492
Published
2025-07-17
How to Cite
Ndilanha, E. G., Jaensson, J.-E., & Gwahula, R. (2025). Integrated landscapes approaches – How are they defined, conceptualised, configured and operationalised and for what objectives: Perspectives from the four practices of distributed leadership practices?. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 43, 362. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/19781
Section
ESI Preprints
Copyright (c) 2025 Edward Gerald Ndilanha, Jan-Erik Jaensson, Raphael Gwahula
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
