Gamification, Scaffolding and Integrative Background: Toward an Inclusive Education Model
Abstract
This article investigates the theoretical interconnections among gamification, Bruner’s concept of scaffolding, and the Italian pedagogical method of the integrative background, examining their potential in fostering personalized and inclusive education. Based on a critical synthesis of theoretical and empirical contributions from recent literature, the study highlights how the convergence of these methodologies can enhance motivation, cognitive development, and active engagement in diverse educational settings. Gamification is analyzed as a tool that fosters engagement and persistence through playful learning dynamics, acting as motivational scaffolding. Scaffolding, as conceptualized by Bruner and enriched by Vygotsky’s contributions, is presented as a flexible support process that adapts to students’ evolving cognitive and emotional needs. The integrative background, sfondo integratore, as developed by Canevaro and Zanelli, is presented as a contextualized methodology that fosters shared meaning-making and reduces barriers to learning and creates inclusive learning environments. Based on these analyses, the paper proposes a theoretical model that integrates gamification, scaffolding, and the integrative background into a coherent educational framework. This model aims to support inclusive practices by promoting meaningful, differentiated learning pathways and improving participation and academic achievement for all learners. The study offers methodological insights for the design of inclusive teaching practices and reflects on the transformative potential of integrating game-based, scaffolded, and narrative-driven learning strategies across diverse educational contexts.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65-79.
3. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Canevaro A., Lippi G., Zanelli P., (1988), Una scuola, uno 'sfondo' , Bologna: Nicola Milano.
5. Chen, C. H., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1201-1212.
6. Daineko, L. V., Goncharova, N. V., Zaitseva, E. V., Larionova, V. A., & Dyachkova, I. A. (2023, November). Gamification in education: a literature review. In International Conference on Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future (pp. 319-343). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
7. Dainese, R. (2019). Sfondo integratore. In Dizionario di pedagogia speciale (pp. 339-344). Brescia: Editrice Morcelliana.
8. Della Volpe, V. (2024). Scenario-Based Learning: An Inclusive Methodology. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 14(6), 1–5.
9. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI'11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2425-2428).
10. Hou, H. T., & Keng, S. H. (2021). A dual-scaffolding framework integrating peer-scaffolding and cognitive-scaffolding for an augmented reality-based educational board game: An analysis of learners’ collective flow state and collaborative learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 547-573.
11. Jadán-Guerrero, J., Avilés-Castillo, F., Buele, J., & Palacios-Navarro, G. (2023, June). Gamification in inclusive education for children with disabilities: global trends and approaches-a bibliometric review. In International conference on computational science and its applications (pp. 461-477). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
12. Kiryakova, G., Angelova, N., & Yordanova, L. (2014, October). Gamification in education. In Proceedings of 9th international Balkan education and science conference (Vol. 1, pp. 679-684).
13. Liasidou, A. (2015). Inclusive education and the issue of change: Theory, policy and pedagogy. Springer.
14. Mäkinen, M., & Mäkinen, E. (2011). Teaching in inclusive setting : Towards collaborative scaffolding. LA NOUVELLE REVUE DE L’ADAPTATION ET DE LA SCOLARISATION, 55(55), 57-74.
15. Moll, L. C. (1990). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Rethinking its instructional implications. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 13(51-52), 157-168.
16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.
17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky”, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (N. Minick, Trans.), Plenum, New York.
18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962) Thought and Language. (E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar, eds. and trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MLT Press.
19. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education (Chapter 10). Cambridge University Press.
20. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
21. Tudge, J. (1992). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 155–172). Cambridge University Press.
22. Zanelli P. (1986), Uno 'sfondo' per integrare, Bologna: Cappelli.
Copyright (c) 2025 Valentina Della Volpe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.