Europe and the Digital Enlightenment: Between Autonomy and Algorithmic Power
Abstract
This study asks whether Europe is truly living up to its Enlightenment heritage in the digital age, or whether it is drifting away from Kant’s ideal of autonomy and moving closer to Foucault’s world of invisible algorithmic control. The text compares Kant’s and Foucault’s views on the Enlightenment and explores how digital technologies-like AI and algorithms-influence personal freedom and social norms. The key question is: Are we thinking for ourselves online, or do algorithms make our choices for us? Western Europe tries to protect autonomy with laws like GDPR or DSA, but can freedom actually be guaranteed by rules from outside? Beyond this philosophical contrast, the study finds that Europe’s digital landscape reveals a growing simulation of autonomy: individuals believe they act freely, yet their actions are increasingly structured by algorithmic systems. Western Europe institutionalizes critical reason, while Eastern Europe exhibits fragmented digital autonomy shaped by distrust and weak institutions. The research concludes that Europe’s Enlightenment legacy can survive only if autonomy is redefined as technological understanding and critical reflection, rather than formal compliance.
Downloads
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Calo, R., & Citron, D. K. (2022). The Automated Administrative State. Emory Law Journal, 70(4), 799–844.
3. Dijck van, J., Poell, T., and de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society. Oxford University Press.
4. European Comission (2022): The Digital Economy and Society Index, 2022. Access: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
5. Floridi, L. (2021). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges and opportunities. Oxford University Press.
6. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
7. Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 32–50). Pantheon Books.
8. Freedom House (2024): Freedom on the Net 2024 – The Struggle for Trust Online. Access: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/FREEDOM-ON-THE-NET-2024-DIGITAL-BOOKLET.pdf
9. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
10. Helbing, D. (2019). Towards digital enlightenment: Essays on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution. Springer.
11. Kant, I. (1784/1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In J. Schmidt (Ed.), What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions (pp. 58–64). University of California Press. (Original work published in 1784)
12. Krastev, I., & Holmes, S. (2019). The light that failed: Why the West is losing the fight for democracy. Pegasus Books.
13. Málik, J. Z. (2025): Individual Benefit – Collective Harm. The Logic of the Prisoner’s Dilemma in Digital Discourse (under publication).
14. Morozov, E. (2021). Freedom as a service: The new digital feudalism and the future of the city. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
15. Yeung, K. (2017). ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186713
16. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jozsef Zoltan Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
