Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Copyright: A Legal Perspective
Abstract
The aim of this research paper is to provide an overview of the current impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on copyright, focusing exclusively on AI-generated works that may be eligible for copyright protection. A central dilemma arises concerning the certainty of copyright-specifically, who owns the copyright in works produced through the use of AI systems. Copyright is a legal concept describing the rights granted to creators of literary and artistic works, including reproduction, copying, performance, and public display.
The growing role of technology in creative processes has significantly expanded and, in some instances, replaced aspects of human involvement. New creative works generated through software programs built on algorithms and databases can no longer be easily distinguished from those produced by human creators. This situation has created substantial uncertainty in both business and legal spheres.
The scope of this article includes (a) an analysis of how key international legal systems address AI-generated creations and their implications for copyright; (b) the identification of possible solutions that governments may adopt to promote legislative uniformity; and (c) an evaluation of how such uniformity could strengthen legal certainty and support ethics and the public interest.
This study follows an explorative, descriptive, qualitative methodology to examine how different countries have approached AI-related legislation, including regulations and enacted laws. The research emphasizes the principles of legal certainty, ethics, and the protection of the public interest.
Findings indicate that countries across different regions are at varying stages in their approach to AI. In the United States, AI-generated works created without human input are not copyrightable. In contrast, Chinese courts have ruled that human intellectual involvement coupled with originality may justify copyright protection for AI-generated works. The United Kingdom (UK) has adopted a more flexible approach, granting copyright to the individual who makes the necessary arrangements for the creation of a work. Overall, North American and European countries have taken the lead. There is a pronounced focus on ethics and the protection of public interest, as reflected in the Global State of Responsible AI Report (2024).
Downloads
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Allen, G., & Chan, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence and national security. Belfer Center for Science & International Affairs.
3. Ani v. OpenAI (2024). https://theleaflet.in/digital-rights/ani-v-openai-in-the-delhi-hc-everything-so-far-and-all-that-is-at-stake
4. Argentine Copyright Law (1933). https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/21169
5. Beijing Internet Court (2023). Li v. Liu. https://archive.org/details/li-v-liu-beijing-internet-court-2023117-with-english-translation
6. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886). https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne
7. Bentley, L. (2014). The UK’s provisions on computer-generated works: A solution for AI creations? Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press.
8. Chekuri, R., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence techniques for advanced computer applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer.
9. Cockburn, J., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. (2019). The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. University of Chicago Press.
10. Copinger, & Skone, J. (1958). The law of copyright. Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
11. Copyright Review Board. (2023, September 5). U.S. Theatre D’opera Spatial Copyright Office, Library of Congress. Copyright registration guidance: Works containing material generated by artificial intelligence (16 March 2023 88 FR 16190).
12. Eastern Book Company v. D. B. Modak (2008) SC 809. https://lawtimesjournal.in/eastern-book-company-and-ors-vs-d-b-modak-and-ors/
13. Express Newspapers Plc v. Liverpool Daily Post & Echo Plc (1985) 1 L.R. 1089.306. https://uk.westlaw.com/document/ia4f136a0e42711da8fc2a0f0355337e9/view/fulltext.html?
14. European Commission. (2020). White paper on artificial intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust.
15. European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (2019/790). https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/
16. European Union Regulation 2024/1689. https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vmew9lsyrzyx
17. Fields, T. (2006). What is intellectual property? Intellectual Property Rights, U.S. State Department. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1866
18. Guadamuz, A. (2017). Do androids dream of electric copyright? Comparative analysis of originality in artificial intelligence-generated works. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2, 169–186.
19. Haugeland, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
20. Hristov, K. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the copyright dilemma. Idea, 57, 431.
21. Iaia, V. (2025). The elephant in the room of European Union copyright originality: Time to unpack & harmonize the essential requirement of copyright. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28(2), 471–490.
22. India Copyright Act (1957). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1367?sam_handle=13456789/1362
23. Intellectual Property Rights. https://chatgpt.com/c/66fb13dc-9348-8001-8202-f05e50e47e3
24. Joe, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and applications. Learning Outcomes of Classroom Research.
25. Mays, W. (1952). Can machines think? Philosophy, 27(101), 148–162. Cambridge University Press.
26. Mishra, K. (2025). AI-generated content & copyright law in India: Navigating the legal maze. https://www.iplink-asia.com/author-detail.php?id=539
27. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd & Ors (2007). https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff71260d03e7f57ea71d6e
28. Rademacher, I. (2020). Regulating artificial intelligence. Springer.
29. Raghav Artificial Intelligence v. Union of India (2025). https://lawfullegal.in/legal-implications-of-ai-generated-works-in-copyright-law-an-analysis-of-raghav-artificial-intelligence--v-union-of-india/
30. Ravid, S. Y. (2018). Generating Rembrandt: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and accountability in the 3A era-the human-like workers are already here-a new model. https://law.yale.edu/schlomit-yanisky-ravid
31. Samuelson, P. (2017). Allocating ownership rights in computer-generated works. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 47, 1185–1224.
32. Sanyal, N., Mishra, S., & Shah, N. (2024). Intersection of intellectual property rights and AI-generated works-Part 1. https://www.barandbench.com/view-point/intersection-intellectual-property-rights-ai-generated-works-par-i
33. Scaria, A. (2018). Does India need a new copyright regime for AI-generated works? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(5), 227–235.
34. Sivasubramanian, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence impact on our everyday lives. Learning Outcomes of Classroom Research. L’ Ordine Nuovo Publication, 1.
35. Spence, M. (2007). Intellectual property. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford University Press.
36. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (2024). Global state of responsible AI report. https://www.hai.stanford.edu/news/ai
37. Surden, H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Georgia State University Law Review.
38. Thaler v. Perlmutter (2023). https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2023/08/thaler-v-perlmutter
39. United Kingdom Copyright, Design & Patents Act (1988). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents
40. United Kingdom Green Paper on Reform of Copyright Protection (1981). https://tind.wipo.int/record/635
41. United Kingdom Report of the Committee to Consider the Law on Copyright and Designs (1977). https://archive.org/details/copyrightdesigns0000grea
42. United States Constitution (1787). https://www.constitutionfacts.com/content/constitution/files/usconstitution_spanish.pdf
43. United States Copyright Act (1976). https://www.copyright.gov
44. United States Copyright Office. (2017). Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office practices, 313.
45. Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Beijing Internet Court grants copyright to AI-generated image for the first time. https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/author/ywang1/
46. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int
47. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: A WIPO issue paper.
48. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). What is intellectual property? https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/
Copyright (c) 2025 Ricardo Daniel Furfaro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
