Brazil’s Indigenous Peoples Articulation (BIPA) Statements on the EU–Mercosur FTA (2019–2025): Human and Environmental Security Implications
Abstract
Drawing upon the decolonial approach within Peace Studies, this paper assesses human and environmental security issues identified in all statements adopted by Brazil's Indigenous Peoples Articulation (BIPA) and published on its webpage concerning the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement. The five official statements issued by BIPA throughout the twenty-five-year negotiation period were located and analyzed, with all documents having been identified within the 2019–2025 period. Employing Content Analysis (CA), utilizing ATLAS.ti software, the paper is structured in two main parts. First, it establishes the decolonial theoretical framework, specifically the Indigenous perspective in Peace Studies, and contextualizes it within current struggles involving Indigenous peoples in Brazil. Second, it systemizes the coding results from the analyzed documents to identify potential implications. The central hypothesis posits that BIPA was predominantly opposed to the EU-Mercosur agreement, emphasizing in its discourse how the strengthening of economic sectors, such as agribusiness and mineral extraction, has the potential to undermine Indigenous land rights and the protection of environmental reserves. The findings reveal a consistently critical position toward the agreement, evidenced by the predominance of the Human and Environmental Security issues category, which accounted for 68 units out of the 117 multiple associations across all subcategories within the coded data. These findings highlight the academic debate on the agreement's potential to exacerbate human insecurity, threatening the livelihoods of Indigenous communities in Brazil.
Downloads
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Benevides, L., Portillo, J. a. C., & Nascimento, W. F. D. (2014). A atenção à saúde dos povos indígenas do Brasil: das missões ao subsistema. Tempus Actas De Saúde Coletiva, 8(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.18569/tempus.v8i1.1450
3. Berringer, T., & Granato, L. (2024). O Acordo De Princípio Mercosul-União Europeia E Os Conflitos Sociais Em Torno Do Seu Avanço E Ratificação. Caderno CRH, 37, e024048. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.51096
4. Brown, W. (2019). In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the West. Columbia University Press.
5. Ruz, J. D. (2020). Un abordaje a la teoría crítica y decolonial de paz del norte y su proceso emergente en América Latina. En J. R. Jaime-Salas, D. G. Correal, K. P. de Armiño, S. L. L. Calero, F. S. C. Herrera, & J. J. Marín (Eds.), Paz decolonial, paces insubordinadas: Conceptos, temporalidades y epistemologías (pp. 75–110). Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Sello Editorial Javeriano.
6. Dalmiglio, N. G. M., Coronato, D. R., & Babo, T. (2025). Militarização e Soberania na Amazônia Brasileira:Um estudo sobre o Governo Bolsonaro. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De Defesa, 12, e025001. https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v12i1.75386
7. De Abreu, G. L. B., Vieira, G. B., & Fadel, A. L. M. (2024). Bio-necropolitics as a form of government and the genocide of the Yanomami people. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 17(2), e5284.
8. De Matos, L. R. (2023). Crônicas de campo na Amazônia: conflitos, cotidianos e histórias vivas em Rondônia. Geography Department University of Sao Paulo, 43, e221317. https://doi.org/10.11606/eissn.2236-2878.rdg.2023.221317
9. De Sousa, N. W. L., & Ferreira, M. A. (2025). Colonialidade militarizada: a crise em terra indígena Yanomami como processo histórico de uma violenta construção de Estado. Revista Latinoamericana Estudios De La Paz Y El Conflicto, 6(12), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.5377/rlpc.v6i12.20428
10. Gimenez, R. B. M. (2023). The pandemic’s golden touch: (Neo)Extractivism, coloniality, and necropolitics on Brazil’s indigenous territories. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit Et Société, 38(3), 352–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2023.28
11. Hallström, E. (2021). Indigenous Interests in Interantional Trade Goverance : A case study of the APIB and the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement. DIVA. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1573173
12. Lander, E. (2000). La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. En E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp. 145–162). CLACSO.
13. Manuel, A., & Schabus, N. (2005). Indigenous peoples at the margin of the global economy: A violation of international human rights and international trade law. Chapman Law Review, 8, 229–256.
14. Mbembe, A. (2018). Necropolítica: Biopoder, soberania, estado de exceção, política da morte (3rd ed.). M-1 Edições.
15. Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 449-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.
16. Motta, F. M., & Hauber, G. (2022). Anti-environmentalism and proto-authoritarian populism in Brazil: Bolsonaro and the defence of global agri-business. Environmental Politics, 32(4), 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2123993
17. Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE.
18. Rocha, M. (2024). A razão neoliberal e os limites da democracia liberal no Brasil. Revista Antígona, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2763-9533/2023.2.7
19. Silva, A. P. M., Macedo, G. F. A., & Monielle, E. (2022). Retraçando caminhos já percorridos? Monções Revista De Relações Internacionais Da UFGD, 11(21), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v11i21.15593
20. Te Maihāroa, K., Ligaliga, M., & Devere, H. (Eds.). (2022). Decolonising peace and conflict studies through indigenous research. Springer Nature.
21. Vieira, C. Q. (2022). Povos originários do Brasil: Dos mitos do passado ao protagonismo do futuro. Boletim CEPGE, 46(6), 62–77.
22. Vogel, D. (2013). Global trade linkages: National security and human security. In V. Aggarwal & K. Govella (Eds.), Linking trade and security: The political economy of the Asia Pacific (Vol. 1, pp. 23–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4765-8_2
Copyright (c) 2026 Guilherme Fenicio Alves Macedo, Lauro Accioly Filho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
