Viral Utterances of Grief and Empathy: A Case Study of Two Major Moments of Social Shock in Bangladesh (2024–25)
Abstract
In the modern era of accessible digital technology, certain spontaneous utterances of common folks, spoken in moments of distress, moral dilemma, or crisis, reach wide audiences through social media like Facebook and become viral expressions of collective emotion, grievance, or solidarity. This study examines how four viral utterances from two major moments of social shock in Bangladesh, which happened in July 2024 (student uprising regarding a political issue) and in 2025 (the Milestone School aircraft tragedy), became viral and transformed into symbols of social justice, human rights advocacy, and public consciousness. Using discourse analysis, cultural semiotics, and affect theory, the study analyzes how expressions such as “Pani lagbe, pani?”, “Why have you killed my son?” “They are my children too...” and “I knew you would come” became markers of moral courage, solidarity, and public grief. To complement the qualitative analysis, a short questionnaire was distributed among 86 university students to explore how these utterances were interpreted and how users perceive the role of Facebook in transforming private emotions into public symbols. Responses on a 5-point Likert scale reveal that participants overwhelmingly viewed these utterances as expressions of empathy, resistance to inequality, and calls for social justice rather than mere personal cries of distress. The findings demonstrate that viral speech acts in Bangladesh’s digital public sphere can mobilize emotional communities, amplify marginalized voices, and contribute to broader discourses on human rights and peacebuilding.
Downloads
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Arjona-Martín, J. B., Méndiz-Noguero, A., & Victoria-Mas, J. S. (2020). Virality as a paradigm of digital communication: Review of the concept and update of the theoretical framework. Profesional de la Información, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.07 .
3. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.
4. Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Polity Press.
5. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.
6. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
7. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
8. Nikolinakou, Angeliki; King, Karen W. (2018). “Viral video ads: Emotional triggers and social media virality”. Psychology & marketing, v. 35, n. 10, pp. 715-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21129
9. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
10. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.
11. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20.
12. Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
13. Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in general linguistics (P. Meisel & H. Saussy, Eds.; W. Baskin, Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1916)
14. Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
15. Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. Sage
16. Wiggins, B. E., & Bowers, G. B. (2015). Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society, 17(11), 1886–1906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194
Copyright (c) 2026 Sayma Arju

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


