Beyond Structural Change: A Cultural Interpretation of School Principals’ “Burnout National” Survey by ANP–LUMSA

  • Grazia Angeloni University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti–Pescara, Italy
Keywords: School leadership; burnout; organizational culture; educational governance; institutional legitimacy

Abstract

The 2025 ANP–LUMSA national survey provides robust empirical evidence of widespread occupational stress among Italian school principals, characterized by high cognitive and emotional demands, excessive workloads, and significant risks of burnout. While these findings are empirically sound and methodologically rigorous, their interpretation cannot be confined to a purely structural or organizational framework. This article argues that the explanatory power of the survey is substantially enhanced when read through a culturalist lens, distinguishing between episodic organizational changes or structural reengineering and deeper processes of cultural transformation in the anthropological sense. From this perspective, principals’ burnout emerges not only as a consequence of excessive demands and insufficient resources but as the outcome of a progressive delegitimization of the leadership role, weakened institutional trust, and governance cultures oriented toward control rather than support. The paper proposes that meaningful improvement cannot be achieved solely through middle management expansion or administrative reinforcement, as suggested by the survey respondents, but requires a reconfiguration of the ethical, symbolic, and relational foundations of school leadership. Such a shift redefines principals’ wellbeing as a collective institutional responsibility and calls for policy responses centered on role recognition, professional dignity, and trust-based educational governance. By integrating empirical evidence with cultural analysis, this study tries to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of leadership burnout and offers a theoretically grounded foundation for policy approaches capable of producing not merely change, but genuine transformation in educational systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Angeloni, G. (2008). Organizzazioni scolastiche e reculturing trasformativo: Un modello culturale per la formazione in servizio. Anicia.
2. Angeloni, G. (2013a). L’approccio culturale alla formazione in servizio degli insegnanti. Science & Philosophy, 1(2), 119–134.
3. Angeloni, G. (2013b). Innovation and teachers’ in-service education: The culture-based approach. European Scientific Journal, 9(19), 262–271.
4. Angeloni, G. (2017). School institutions as complex systemic organizations: A multidisciplinary perspective. In Š. Hošková-Mayerová, F. Maturo, & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), Mathematical-statistical models and qualitative theories for economic and social sciences (pp. 325–332). Sperling International Publishing.
5. ANP & LUMSA University. (2025). Il prezzo della leadership: Risultati dell’indagine ANP–LUMSA sul benessere dei dirigenti scolastici italiani. Associazione Nazionale Dirigenti Pubblici e Alte Professionalità della Scuola.
6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Polity Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the tyranny of the market. The New Press.
9. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–83.
10. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.
11. Dubet, F. (2002). Le déclin de l’institution. Seuil.
12. Dubet, F. (2006). Injustices: L’expérience des inégalités au travail. Seuil.
13. Dubet, F. (2011). Pourquoi préférons-nous l’inégalité? Seuil.
14. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press.
15. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
16. Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin.
17. Herman, K. C., Hickmon-Rosa, J., & Reinke, W. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 88–104.
18. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 43–66). Springer.
19. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
20. OECD. (2020). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing.
21. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership, Volume 1: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing.
22. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout and work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893–917.
23. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
24. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
25. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2017). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 43(1), 119–153.
26. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
27. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
28. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Blackwell.
Published
2026-02-28
How to Cite
Angeloni, G. (2026). Beyond Structural Change: A Cultural Interpretation of School Principals’ “Burnout National” Survey by ANP–LUMSA. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 22(4), 63. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2026.v22n4p63
Section
ESJ Social Sciences