Septorhinoplasty and Its Relevance to Health Outcomes: Functional and Psychosocial Assessment

  • Mariam Topuria University of Georgia, School of Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia
Keywords: Septorhinoplasty; Rhinoplasty; Nasal Obstruction; Quality of Life

Abstract

Background: Septorhinoplasty aims to address both aesthetic and functional nasal concerns, and its impact may extend across multiple dimensions of daily living. This study evaluated the functional, psychosocial, and quality-of-life effects of septorhinoplasty using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: A prospective single-centre cohort design was employed. Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) were calculated. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used to assess the differences between pre- and postoperative outcomes, and the Spearman rank correlation test evaluated the associations between functional improvement and psychosocial outcomes. A priori sample size estimation supported adequate statistical power (power >95%, α <0.05). A total of 150 patients completed the NOSE questionnaire, the Stress Assessment Questionnaire, and the WHOQOL-BREF preoperatively and at the six-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. Results: Postoperative evaluations demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in nasal function (NOSE scores, p<0.001). Psychological outcomes showed notable enhancements in self-esteem and reductions in stress-related symptoms (Z=8.44, p<0.001). WHOQOL-BREF revealed significant gains in physical, psychological, and social domains (all p<0.001). Greater functional improvement was moderately associated with better psychological and social outcomes (r=0.5, p<0.05). Conclusion: Septorhinoplasty significantly improves not only nasal airflow and facial satisfaction but also multiple dimensions of health-related quality of life, including sleep, energy, social confidence, and psychological well-being. Although limited by its single-centre design and absence of long-term follow-up, these findings highlight the broader functional and psychosocial relevance of septorhinoplasty beyond cosmetic correction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Meningaud, J. P., et al. (2008). Psychosocial impact of functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty: A prospective study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 121(2), 404–410.
2. Schwitzer, J. A., et al. (2015). Psychological considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 35(3), 261–268.
3. Litner, J. A., et al. (2017). Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on self-esteem and quality of life. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 25(3), 367–373.
4. Rohrich, R. J., & Ahmad, J. (2011). Rhinoplasty: Refinement and revision. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 128(2), 49e–73e.
5. Rhee, J. S., et al. (2014). Clinical consensus statement: Diagnosis and management of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 150(6), 870–880.
6. Kosins, A. M., et al. (2013). Functional rhinoplasty: Aesthetic and airway outcomes. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 15(1), 21–28.
7. Ishii, L. E., et al. (2019). The psychosocial impact of nasal surgery: Patient-reported outcomes. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 21(5), 369–375.
8. Sarwer, D. B., et al. (2018). Body image, quality of life, and psychological functioning in aesthetic surgery patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 142(5), 715e–725e.
9. Honigman, R., et al. (2004). A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 113(4), 1229–1237.
10. van Egmond, M. M., et al. (2016). Objective and subjective outcomes after septorhinoplasty: A prospective cohort study. Clinical Otolaryngology, 41(5), 564–571.
Published
2026-03-23
How to Cite
Topuria, M. (2026). Septorhinoplasty and Its Relevance to Health Outcomes: Functional and Psychosocial Assessment. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 22(38), 229. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2026.v22n38p229