Representation of a Minor in Civil Proceedings
Abstract
This article examines the legal and practical aspects of the representation of minors in civil proceedings, with particular emphasis on the principle of the best interests of the child as a fundamental standard of child protection. Due to their limited legal capacity and vulnerability, minors require enhanced legal safeguards, primarily ensured through the institution of legal representation. The representative plays a crucial role in guaranteeing the effective exercise of the child’s procedural rights and communicating the child’s views within judicial proceedings. The study analyzes international and domestic legal frameworks, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and Georgian legislation, and demonstrates how the principle of the best interests of the child functions as a guiding standard in decision-making processes. A comparative perspective highlights differences in the application of this principle across legal systems, particularly regarding discretion and predictability. The article identifies key practical challenges, including the formalistic nature of representation, insufficient qualifications of representatives, and conflicts of interest between minors and their legal representatives. It also emphasizes the role of courts in ensuring that representation is not merely procedural, but genuinely effective. The findings suggest that effective representation depends not only on the existence of legal norms, but also on their proper implementation. Strengthening institutional mechanisms, improving professional training, and ensuring child-centered justice are essential for the effective protection of minors’ rights and the meaningful realization of the principle of the best interests of the child.
Downloads
References
2. Bala, N. (2015). Child representation in Alberta: Role and responsibilities of counsel for the child in family proceedings. Alberta Law Review.
3. Child Welfare Act (Norway).
4. Children Act (Norway).
5. Civil Code of Georgia. (1997).
6. Civil Procedure Code of Georgia. (1995).
7. Code on the Rights of the Child of Georgia.
8. Constitution of Georgia. (1995).
9. Council of Europe. (2010). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. https://rm.coe.int/16804b2cf3
10. Elsholz v. Germany, No. 25735/94, European Court of Human Rights (2000).
11. Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (Austl.). https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A00275/latest/text
12. Haarberg, F. L. (2024). What do we know about children’s representation in child protection decisions? A scoping review. Children and Youth Services Review, 160. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924001609
13. Kiladze, S., & Turava, P. (2021). Commentary on the Code on the Rights of the Child.
14. Luhamaa, K., Krutzinna, J., & Skivenes, M. (2022). Child’s best interest in child protection legislation of 44 jurisdictions. Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism.
15. Mol, C. (2019). A comparative evaluation in light of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. https://brill.com/view/journals/chil/27/1/article-p66_66.xml
16. Reinder, I., & Huijer, J. (2024). The legal representation of parents and children during placement procedures in the light of Article 8 ECHR. Utrecht Law Review, 20(2), 40–53. https://utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.36633/ulr.938
17. Skivenes, M., & Sørsdal, L. M. (2018). The child’s best interest principle across child protection jurisdictions. In Human rights in child protection: Implications for professional practice and policy (pp. 63–64).
18. Sloth-Nielsen, J. (2008). Realising children’s rights to legal representation and to be heard in judicial proceedings: An update. South African Journal on Human Rights, 24(3), 497–498.
19. Supreme Court of Georgia. (2017, October 27). Decision No. AS-85-81-2017.
20. Supreme Court of Georgia. (2022, March 29). Decision No. AS-733-2020.
21. Supreme Court of Georgia. (2022, June 23). Decision No. AS-716-2021.
22. Supreme Court of Georgia. (2024, March 7). Decision No. AS-1639-2023.
23. Supreme Court of Georgia. (2024, October 11). Decision No. AS-997-2024.
24. T.K. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom, No. 28945/95, European Court of Human Rights (2001).
25. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child.
26. University of Pretoria. (2016). Guidelines for legal representatives of children in civil matters. https://www.pulp.up.ac.za/other-publications/guidelines-for-legal-representatives-of-children-in-civil-matters/120-guidelines-for-legal-representatives-of-children-in-civil-matters/viewdocument/120
Copyright (c) 2026 Mariam Saneblidze
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
