Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Natural Tooth Color Distribution Across Three Dental Shade Guide Systems: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Julija Zarkova Atanasova Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
  • Katerina Zlatanovska Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
  • Ljubica Proseva Pelivanova Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
  • Sandra Atanasova Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
  • Bruno Nikolovski Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
  • Natasha Longurova Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
  • Pavle Apostoloski Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, North Macedonia
Keywords: Tooth color; Spectrophotometry; Shade guides; Esthetic dentistry

Abstract

Accurate determination of tooth color is essential for achieving optimal esthetic outcomes in restorative dentistry. Spectrophotometry has emerged as a reliable method for objective color assessment, overcoming the limitations of visual shade selection. This study aimed to evaluate the distribution of natural tooth color using spectrophotometric measurements, to compare its representation across three dental shade guide systems, and to assess its variation according to gender and age. A total of 235 participants aged 18–69 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Tooth color of maxillary central incisors was measured using a non-contact spectrophotometer (ShadePilot). The obtained values were matched to VITA Classical, Ivoclar Chromascop, and VITA 3D-Master shade guides. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson Chi-square test (p < 0.05). Shades from Group A (VITA Classical), Group 100 (Chromascop), and Group 2 (VITA 3D-Master) were the most prevalent. Significant differences in shade distribution were observed across all three systems. Both gender and age showed statistically significant influence on tooth color (p < 0.05), with a clear trend toward darker shades in older age groups. Natural tooth color distribution varies depending on the shade guide system used and is significantly influenced by demographic factors. Spectrophotometric analysis provides a reliable approach for improving shade selection and enhancing esthetic outcomes in clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alvarado-Lorenzo, M., et al. (2025). Impact of vision defects on tooth shade selection. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(1), 293.
2. Ansari, L., et al. (2010). Evaluation of tooth color distribution. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects.
3. Chu, S. J., Trushkowsky, R. D., & Paravina, R. D. (2010). Dental color matching: Instruments and systems. Quintessence Publishing.
4. Crespo, P. C., et al. (2022). Variability in tooth color selection by different spectrophotometers: A systematic review. The Open Dentistry Journal, 16, e187421062211180.
5. Dozić, A., Kleverlaan, C. J., Aartman, I. H. A., & Feilzer, A. J. (2004). Relation in color of three regions of vital human incisors. Dental Materials, 20(9), 832–838.
6. Gasparik, C., Culic, B., Badea, M. E., & Dudea, D. (2025). The color of natural teeth: A scoping review. Dental Materials.
7. Hardan, L., Bourgi, R., Cuevas-Suárez, C. E., et al. (2022). Novel trends in dental color match using different shade selection methods. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(1), 123.
8. Hasegawa, A., Motonomi, A., Ikeda, I., & Kawaguchi, S. (2000). Color of natural tooth crown. Color Research and Application, 25(1), 43–48.
9. Hammad, I. A. (2003). Intrarater repeatability of shade selections. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(1), 50–53.
10. Hassel, A. J., et al. (2008). Influence of age and gender on tooth color. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 100(6), 439–445.
11. Herekar, M. G., Sethi, M., et al. (2018). Tooth shade selection: A clinical study. Journal of Prosthodontics.
12. Kupke, L., et al. (2025). In vivo reproducibility of tooth shade determination on intraoral scans compared to spectrophotometric methods. Clinical Oral Investigations.
13. Lee, J. H., Kim, M. J., Kim, S. H., et al. (2024). A comparative study of shade-matching performance using an intraoral scanner, spectrophotometer, and visual assessment. Scientific Reports, 14, 74354.
14. Odioso, L. L., Gibb, R. D., & Gerlach, R. W. (2000). Impact of demographic variables on tooth color perception. Journal of Dentistry.
15. Paravina, R. D., & Powers, J. M. (2004). Esthetic color training in dentistry. Elsevier Mosby.
16. Rodrigues, S., et al. (2012). Tooth color distribution and its relationship with age. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.
17. Yamamoto, M. (1992). Metal-ceramics: Principles and methods. Quintessence Publishing.
Published
2026-05-19
How to Cite
Zarkova Atanasova, J., Zlatanovska, K., Proseva Pelivanova, L., Atanasova, S., Nikolovski, B., Longurova, N., & Apostoloski, P. (2026). Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Natural Tooth Color Distribution Across Three Dental Shade Guide Systems: A Cross-Sectional Study. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 53, 756. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/21038
Issue
Vol 53 (2026): ESI Preprints
Section
ESI Preprints

Copyright (c) 2026 Julija Zarkova Atanasova, Katerina Zlatanovska, Ljubica Proseva Pelivanova, Sandra Atanasova, Bruno Nikolovski, Natasha Longurova, Pavle Apostoloski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.