Field Philosophy as a Disruptive Practice: Between Philosophical Legitimacy and Methodological Divergence
Abstract
Philosophy is increasingly confronted with demands for social relevance that challenge its traditional modes of intervention. This article critically examines field philosophy as a situated and dialogical practice developed with non-academic actors. Drawing on Frodeman, Vollaire, Despret, and Stengers, it argues that field philosophy is not merely an applied extension of philosophy nor a transposition of social science methods. Rather, it reconfigures philosophical practice at methodological and epistemic levels. While it shares an attention to concrete situations with empirical inquiry, it differs through its reflexive stance, its normative orientation, and its commitment to co-construction rather than explanation. By foregrounding post-research follow-up and the empowerment of actors, the article proposes recognizing field philosophy as a disruptive yet legitimate practice that reshapes the public and epistemic responsibilities of philosophy.
Downloads
PlumX Statistics
References
Bastian, M. (2018). Philosophy disturbed: Reflections on moving between field and philosophy. Parallax, 24(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1546723
Buchanan, B., Bastian, M., & Chrulew, M. (2018). Introduction: Field philosophy and other experiments. Parallax, 24(4), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1546715
Dekeuwer, C. (2019). Qu’est ce que la philosophie de terrain ? Éthique, politique et religions, 2(15), 9–15.
Dekeuwer, C., & Henry, J. (2019). Philosophie pratique de terrain. Quelle posture de recherche ? Éthique, politique et religions, 2(15), 131–145.
Despret, V. (2018). Out of the books: Field philosophy. Parallax, 24(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1546719
Dewey, J. (2005). Le public et ses problèmes (J. Zask, Trad.). Éditions Gallimard. (Ouvrage original publié en 1927)
Dewey, J. (2014). Reconstruction en philosophie (P. Di Mascio, Trad.). Éditions Gallimard. (Ouvrage original publié en 1920)
Frodeman, R. (2010). The dedisciplining of philosophy. The Philosopher's Magazine, (50), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm201050108
Frodeman, R., & Briggle, A. (2012). The dedisciplining of peer review. Minerva, 50(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9192-8
Frodeman, R., & Briggle, A. (2016). Socrates tenured: The institutions of 21st-century philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield.
Frodeman, R., Briggle, A., & Holbrook, J. B. (2012). Philosophy in the age of neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 26(3–4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2012.722701
Frodeman, R., & Brister, E. (2020). A guide to field philosophy: Case studies and practical strategies. Routledge.
Goubet, J. F. (2002). Fondement, principes et utilité de la connaissance. Archives de philosophie, 65(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.651.0081
Lacroix, A. (2014). Quand la philosophie doit s’appliquer. Hermann.
Lacroix, A., & Marchildon, A. (2020). La philosophie pratique comme enquête dans le monde. Dans A. Lacroix (dir.), La philosophie pratique pour penser la société (pp. 1–24). Presses de l’Université Laval.
Latour, B. (2007). L’espoir de Pandore : Pour une version réaliste de l’activité scientifique (D. Gille, Trad.). La Découverte. (Ouvrage original publié en 1999)
Marchildon, A. (2018, 19 juin). La philosophie de terrain : Simple méthode ou (autre) façon de faire de la philosophie ? [Communication]. Colloque international « La philosophie pratique », Longueuil, QC, Canada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwk3o0x114s
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Les émotions démocratiques : Comment former le citoyen du XXIe siècle ? (S. Chavel, Trad.). Flammarion. (Ouvrage original publié en 2010 sous le titre Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities)
Paltrinieri, L. (2020). Critique de la philosophie de terrain : Plaidoyer pour l’enquête philosophique. Lecture du livre de Christiane Vollaire, Pour une philosophie de terrain. Rue Descartes, 97(1), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdes.097.0174
Savransky, M. (2018). The ethical and political consequences of a paradoxical ecology of knowledge. Parallax, 24 (4), 392-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1546717
Stengers, I. (2013). Une autre science est possible ! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences. La Découverte.
Stengers, I. (2018). Aude sapere: Dare betray the testator’s demands. Parallax, 24(4), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1546718
Stengers, I., & Despret, V. (2014). Women who make a fuss: The unfaithful daughters of Virginia Woolf. University of Minnesota Press.
Ternier, C. (2018). « Faire du terrain » en philosophie politique. Dans M. Bessone (dir.), Méthodes en philosophie politique (pp. 227–257). Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Vollaire, C. (2017). Pour une philosophie de terrain. Éditions Créaphis.
Copyright (c) 2026 Adou Josias Nyamike
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
