AI-Enhanced Virtual Reality University Office Environments: An Empirical Study of Student Perceptions, Presence, and Adoption Intent
Abstract
Integrating artificial intelligence and virtual reality technologies will influence how we teach and learn at the university. Furthermore, very few studies examine students’ views of AI-driven virtual reality simulations of university office settings. We present a study at International Balkan University with 58 pre-session participants and 29 post-session observers, involved in a virtual reality simulation of the university office scenario using an AI-integrated assistant. This study evaluates five constructs (observation quality, presence and realism, artificial intelligence feature perception, usability and adoption intent, and future readiness) using validated Likert-scale questionnaires and open-ended qualitative responses. Our findings indicate high accuracy in perceiving artificial intelligence (M = 4.48/5), remarkably high clarity of observation (M = 4.39/5), and moderately high adoption intent (M = 4.12/5). In contrast, privacy concerns (M = 3.24/5) and trust calibration are still problematic areas. Pre-session findings reveal that most participants had no meaningful virtual reality exposure (M = 1.88/5); however, they were quite experienced with artificial intelligence tools (M = 4.26/5), defining a sharp technology asymmetry in the sample. Qualitative comments show that artificial intelligence meeting summarization and instant question/answering are the most favored features, while data privacy issues and academic over-reliance are the main concerns. This study introduces a new survey and mixed-methods approach to the growing scholarly discussion of the metaverse as an educational platform. At the same time, it reveals direct implications for the design of AI-powered virtual reality spaces for learning.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deeks, H. M., Walters, R. K., Hare, S. R., O’Connor, M. B., Mulholland, A. J., & Glowacki, D. R. (2020). Interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality for accurate flexible protein-ligand docking. PLOS ONE, 15(3), e0228461. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228461
Feta, A. A., & Kamberaj, H. (2025). Impact of Metaverse Technologies Integration on Biotechnological Innovation: A Literature Review. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 21(21), 1. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n21p1
Kaddoura, S., & Al Husseiny, F. (2023). The rising trend of Metaverse in education: challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1252. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1252
Kostick-Quenet, K., & Rahimzadeh, V. (2023). Ethical hazards of health data governance in the metaverse. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(5), 480–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00658-w
Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda.
McKinney, W. (2010). Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. 56–61. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a
Mosharraf, M. (2025). Data governance in metaverse: Addressing security threats and countermeasures across the data lifecycle. Technology in Society, 82, 102910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102910
Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031
Petrigna, L., & Musumeci, G. (2022). The Metaverse: A New Challenge for the Healthcare System: A Scoping Review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 7(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7030063
Rahimzadeh, V., Kostick-Quenet, K., Blumenthal Barby, J., & McGuire, A. L. (2023). Ethics Education for Healthcare Professionals in the Era of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models: Do We Still Need It? The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(10), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2233358
Riva, G., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2022). What the Metaverse Is (Really) and Why We Need to Know About It. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(6), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0124
Shah, P., Patel, C., Patel, J., Shah, A., Pandya, S., & Sojitra, B. (2024). Utilizing Blockchain Technology for Healthcare and Biomedical Research: A Review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72040
Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
Sparrow, R., & Flenady, G. (2025). Bullshit universities: the future of automated education. AI & SOCIETY, 40(7), 5285–5296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02340-8
Syed Abdul, S., Upadhyay, U., Salcedo, D., & Lin, C.-W. (2022). Virtual reality enhancing medical education and practice: Brief communication. DIGITAL HEALTH, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221143948
Taylor, S., & Soneji, S. (2022). Bioinformatics and the Metaverse: Are We Ready? Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2022.863676
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
Alblooshi, A. S., et al. (2026). The use of the extended reality technologies in simulation-based health professions education: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 13, 1787542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1787542
Bitloft Office. (2026, April 4). Workshop approval for VR university office demonstration study. International Balkan University.
Saren, F., Ghosh, C., Shit, S., & Paul, A. (2026). Metaverse in education: Opportunities, challenges, and future prospects. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.168
Violanti, R. J. (2026, April 22). Humanizing generative AI: Three ways to keep students at the center of your classroom. Faculty Focus.
Wei, Y., Li, Y., Hu, W., Kang, J., Han, Z., Zhen, M., & Wang, C. (2026). Artificial intelligence and immersive digital technologies in periodontal education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Oral Health, 7, 1741033. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2026.1741033
Copyright (c) 2026 Amra Abazi Feta, Hiqmet Kamberaj

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


