Grid Modernization Policies in California: Coherence of Policy Goals
Abstract
In grid modernization, California stands out. To that end, this research explores the role of policy coherence in the success story of California. It avers that policy coherence is only a contributive factor to California’s success in grid modernization, as other factors like political will, regulatory capacity, technology, and stakeholder collaboration played a more significant role than policy coherence did. The study demonstrates that for California to have had exceptional success amidst the overall low policy coherence, the other factors mattered more in the process. A large number of smart meters are found in California, which improve grid responsiveness and user engagement through precise collection of data on energy usage patterns. Besides, they increase the integration of renewable energy sources, and improve effective resource management. In conclusion, California contributes enormously to the overall reliability and resilience of grid modernization in the US. Stakeholders should collaboratively ensure increased policy coherence in grid modernization, and increased adoption, utilization, and sustenance of smart technologies and deliverables.
Downloads
References
Albert, M. J. (2020). Beyond continuationism: Climate change, economic growth, and the future of world (dis)order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1825334
Ansell, C., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: the search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3- 22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874
Behnke, N., Broschek, J., & Sonnicksen, J. (2019). Configurations, dynamics and mechanisms of multilevel governance: Comparative territorial politics. Springer International Publishing.
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26-31.
Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.
Bocquillon, P. (2018). (De-)Constructing coherence? Strategic entrepreneurs, policy frames and the integration of climate and energy policies in the European Union. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(5), 339-349.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1820
Brand, A., Furness, M., & Keijzer, N. (2021). Promoting policy coherence within the 2030 agenda framework: Externalities, trade-offs and politics. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 108-118.
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608
Briassoulis, H. (2004). Policy integration for complex policy problems: What, why and how. Greening of Policies: Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin, 3-4.
Cairney, P. (2019). Understanding public policy: theories and issues. Bloomsbury Publishing.
California Energy Storage Alliance. (2026). “Policy work.” https://storagealliance.org/policy- work
California ISO. (2019). Energy storage - Perspectives from California and Europe. Discussion Paper - October 2019. Renewables Grid Initiative.
https://www.caiso.com/documents/energystorage-perspectivesfromcalifornia-europe.pdf
California Public Utilities Commission. (2018). Resolution E-4949. https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/publisheddocs/published/g000/m240/k050/240050937.pdf
California Public Utilities Commission. (2021). Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP). Retrieved from [website].
Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211-231. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2018). Policy integration in the EU governance of global food security. Food Security, 10(1), 195-209. doi:10.1007/s12571-017-0752-5
CESA. (2024, June 18). California state assembly passes energy storage bill AB 2514-Landmark energy storage legislation now heads to senate. https://storagealliance.org/news/state-assembly-passes-energy-storage-bill
Dai, A., Cui, X., & Gordon, J. (2025, Aug.). Financing battery storage in China: Insights from California’s practices. UC Berkeley California-China Climate Institute.
Duffy, R. J., & Cook, J. J. (2019). Overcoming bureaucratic silos? Environmental policy integration in the Obama administration. Environmental Politics, 28(7), 1192-1213.
doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1511074
Duraiappah, A. K., & Bhardwaj, A. (2007). Measuring policy coherence among the MEAs and MDGs. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Elizalde, D. (2024, May 20). What’s complicating the delivery of reliable and resilient power? Bipartisan Policy Center.
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/whats-complicating-the- delivery-of-reliable-and-resilient-power/?campaignid=18598281593&adgroupid=166681407551&keyword=renewable%20energy&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=18598281593&gclid=CjwKCAjw0dPRBhAPEiwAE5vTTuDZo3kx2vnZGAF1bN7o_yxEEKa3wd9XJLsanTwojzVs6XEGi29hUBoCXI8QAvD_BwE
Estoque, R. C. (2023). Complexity and diversity of nexuses: a review of the nexus approach in the sustainability context. Science of the Total Environment, 854 (January), 158612.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158612.
European Commission. (2019). Communication from the commission. The European Green Deal.
ExxonMobil. (2026). “Low carbon solutions.” Accessed from
https://lowcarbon.exxonmobil.com/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_camp aign=1ELC_GAD_TRAF_OT_Non-Brand_EX%2BBR_Low+Carbon+Solutions_P3C34CM&utm_content=OT_Non-Brand_Energy+Transition&utm_term=sustainable+energy+technology&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22507880566&gclid=CjwKCAjw0dPRBhAPEiwAE5vTTli3HFme4d9sHauHG-bp9_gCFQfRDnH3KD9pvBaAUZl_pMIxzGOZTxoCBbMQAvD_BwE
Giest, S. (2020). Making energy personal: policy coordination challenges in UK smart meter implementation. Journal of Public Policy, 40(4), 553-572. doi:10.1017/S0143814X19000163
Gottenhuber, S. (2026, Feb.). Policy coherence in process and outcome: Solving sustainability goal conflicts? Linköping University/LiU Tryck (LiU-tryck). ISBN: 978-91-8118-489-1
DOI: 10.3384/9789181184907.
Grandi, S., &Martellozzo, F. (2024). The environmental and sustainable development perspective. In N. F. Dotti, I. Musiałkowska, S. De Gregorio Hurtado, & J. Walczyk (eds.), EU cohesion policy: a multidisciplinary approach (193–212). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73-89.
Howlett, M., & K. Saguin (2018). Policy Capacity for Policy Integration: Implications for the sustainable development goals. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’.
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147-158.
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: a state-of-the-art review. Environmental policy and governance, 20(3), 147-158.
Kosow, H., Weimer-Jehle, W., León, C. D., Minn, F. (2022). Designing synergetic and sustainable policy mixes - a methodology to address conflictive environmental issues. Environmental Science & Policy, 130, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.007. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901122000132).
Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005
Monticone, F., & Samoggia, A. (2023). Food policy coherence and integration: a review of adopted methodologies. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (Rivista di Economia Agraria), 78(3), 35–49.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/rea/article/view/14439
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Kovacic, Z., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll-Bosch, R. (2021). Food, energy or biomaterials? Policy coherence across agro-food and bioeconomy policy domains in the EU, Environmental Science & Policy, 123, 21-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.001.
Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D. et al. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustain Sci 13, 1489–1503.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., & McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector– environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589.
OECD. (2023). Driving policy coherence for sustainable development (1st ed.).
OECD. (2024). Unleashing policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: an assessment of governance mechanisms. https://doi.org/10.1787/a1c8dbf8-en
Owaineh, A., Leach, M., Guest, P., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2015). Policy, niches and diffusion in UK Smart Grid Innovation. Centre for Environmental Strategy.
Platjouw, F. M., Friedrich, L., Trubbach, S., Sander, G., Boteler, B., Passarello, C. C., Soininen, N., de Oliveira, C. S., Kyrönviita, J., Belinskij, A., Puharinen, S.-T., & Albrecht, E. (2024, Feb.). The CrossGov policy coherence evaluation framework-A methodological framework to assess policy coherence and cross-compliance with the European Green Deal. Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) in conjunction with RIFS, UEF, and ACTeon.
Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2017). Conceptual and empirical advances in analyzing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
Rossi, P. (2024). Conflicts in public policy implementation. In Encyclopedia of Public Policy (pp. 1-4). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_103-1
Sachs, J. D. (2025). Sustainable development report 2025: Financing sustainable development to 2030 and mid-century includes the SDG Index and Dashboards (10th ed.). Dublin University Press.
Scobie, M. (2016). Policy coherence in climate governance: A case study of Trinidad and Tobago. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.008
The European Commission. (2018). Evaluation of the impact of the CAP on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553-570.
Doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
U.S. Department of Energy. (2021). Building technologies office: energy efficiency and renewable energy data privacy.
https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/energy-efficiency-and-renewable-energy-data-privacy)
von Lüpke, H., & Well, M. (2020). Analyzing climate and energy policy integration: the case of the Mexican energy transition. Climate Policy, 20(7), 832-845. Doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1648236
Copyright (c) 2026 Josephine Amponsem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
