Independent Evaluation of Four SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests Against qRT-PCR in Niger

  • Fatimata Hassane Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Moussa Issa Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Issifi Kollo Abdoulkader Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Wilfried Hounkanrin Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Hadiza Ousmane Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Bintou Kiari Kairo Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Balki Aoula Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Santou Mamadou Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Hama Hamidou Issa Niamey National Hospital, Niamey, Niger
  • Bassira Issaka Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Emeline Capo Chichi Gamkalle Clinic, Niamey, Niger
  • Ronan Jambou Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
  • Adamou Lagare Center for Medical and Health Research (CERMES), Niamey, Niger
Keywords: COVID-19 ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Rapid diagnostic test ; Sensitivity ; Specificity ; Niger

Abstract

Background: Reliable, decentralised SARS-CoV-2 testing was a major challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in low and middle-income countries where molecular capacity was limited. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) offered a practical alternative, but their field performance varied and locally generated data were needed to guide policy.

Objectives: We indepently evaluated four commercial Ag-RDTs, including an African manufactured test, under routine conditions in Niger to inform the national COVID-19 testing algorithm.

Methods: Between July 2021 and September 2023, four independent prospective evaluations were conducted among symptomatic patients (symptom onset ≤7 days) at two health facilities in Niamey. Each test namely STANDARD Q nasopharyngeal, Panbio nasopharyngeal and nasal and SAYTU nasal was assessed against qRT-PCR. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Across the four evaluations, 956 patients were tested and 422 (44.1%) were qRT-PCR positive. Sensitivity was 85.7% for the Panbio nasopharyngeal test, 80.1% for the SAYTU nasal test, 76.3% for the Panbio nasal test and 75.0% for the STANDARD Q nasopharyngeal test; specificity exceeded 95% for all four. Sensitivity was highest in high-viral-load specimens.

Conclusion: Only the Panbio nasopharyngeal test met both WHO criteria of sensitivity ≥80% and specificity ≥ 97%. However, the other three tests, including the Africa-manufactured SAYTU assay, may support screening where molecular capacity is limited, provided that negative results in symptomatic patients are confirmed by qRT-PCR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agulló, V., Fernández-González, M., Ortiz de la Tabla, V., Gonzalo-Jiménez, N., García, J. A., Masiá, M., & Gutiérrez, F. (2021). Evaluation of the rapid antigen test Panbio COVID-19 in saliva and nasal swabs in a population-based point-of-care study. Journal of Infection, 82(5), 186–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.12.007

Al-Alawi, S., Al-Hinai, H., Al-Kindi, N., Al-Rashidi, M., Al-Kindi, H., Al-Shukri, I., Al-Rashdi, A., Jose, S., & Al-Jardani, A. (2021). Evaluation of four rapid antigen tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Oman Medical Journal, 36(5), Article e297.

Albert, E., Torres, I., Bueno, F., Huntley, D., Molla, E., Fernández-Fuentes, M. Á., Martínez, M., Poujois, S., Forqué, L., Valdivia, A., Solano de la Asunción, C., Ferrer, J., Colomina, J., & Navarro, D. (2021). Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 27(3), 472.e7–472.e10.

Chaimayo, C., Kaewnaphan, B., Tanlieng, N., Athipanyasilp, N., Sirijatuphat, R., Chayakulkeeree, M., Angkasekwinai, N., Sutthent, R., Puangpunngam, N., Tharmviboonsri, T., Pongraweewan, O., Chuthapisith, S., Sirivatanauksorn, Y., Kantakamalakul, W., & Horthongkham, N. (2020). Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand. Virology Journal, 17(1), Article 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5

Corman, V. M., Landt, O., Kaiser, M., Molenkamp, R., Meijer, A., Chu, D. K., Bleicker, T., Brünink, S., Schneider, J., Schmidt, M. L., Mulders, D. G., Haagmans, B. L., van der Veer, B., van den Brink, S., Wijsman, L., Goderski, G., Romette, J.-L., Ellis, J., Zambon, M., … Drosten, C. (2020). Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Eurosurveillance, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomedica, 91(1), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397

Dessalegn, D., Tola, E. K., Tamiru, A., & Zerfu, B. (2022). Evaluation of the performance of Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in suspected patients in Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121221110079

Dutta, D., Naiyer, S., Mansuri, S., Soni, N., Singh, V., Bhat, K. H., Singh, N., Arora, G., & Mansuri, M. S. (2022). (2022). COVID-19 diagnosis: A comprehensive review of the RT-qPCR method for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Diagnostics, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061503

Faico-Filho, K. S., Ferreira Junior, F. E., Moreira, L. V. L., Lins, P. R. G., Justo, A. F. O., & Bellei, N. (2022). Evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test at an emergency room in a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102349

Farfour, E., Amiel, C., Jolly, E., Zia-Chahabi, S., Mazaux, L., Simonin, P., Berkane, I., Cornily, M., Pascreau, T., & SARS-CoV-, M (2021). The Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test: Which performances are for COVID-19 diagnosis? Clinical Laboratory, 67(11). https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210304

Goodall, B. L., LeBlanc, J. J., Hatchette, T. F., Barrett, L., & Patriquin, G. (2022). Investigating the sensitivity of nasal or throat swabs: Combination of both swabs increases the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests. Microbiology Spectrum, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00217-22

Kim, H. W., Park, M., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Clinical evaluation of the rapid STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag test for the screening of SARS-CoV-2. Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 42(1), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.100

Linares, M., Pérez-Tanoira, R., Carrero, A., . (2020). Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms. Journal of Clinical Virology, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659

Lindner, A. K., Nikolai, O., Rohardt, C., S., Hülso, C., Bölke, A., Gertler, M., Krüger, L. J., Gaeddert, M., Tobian, F., Lainati, F., Seybold, J., Jones, T. C., Hofmann, J., Sacks, J. A., Mockenhaupt, F. P., & Denkinger, C. M. (2021). Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with professional-collected nasal versus nasopharyngeal swab. European Respiratory Journal, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.04430-2020

Merino, P., Guinea, J., Muñoz-Gallego, I., González-Donapetry, P., Galán, J. C., Antona, N., Cilla, G., Hernáez-Crespo, S., Díaz-de Tuesta, J. L., Gual-de Torrella, A., González-Romo, F., Escribano, P., Sánchez-Castellano, M. Á., Sota-Busselo, M., Delgado-Iribarren, A., García, J., Cantón, R., Muñoz, P., Folgueira, M. D., … Oteo-Iglesias, J. (2021). Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.001

Oh, S. M., Lee, J. S., Jo, H. J., Kim, D., Park, D., Hwang, Y. H., Choi, Y., Lee, C. M., Lee, S., Chang, E., Lee, E., Kim, T. S., Seong, M.-W., Choe, P. G., & Kim, N. J. (2022). Clinical application of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test device and SSf-COVID19 kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), Article 357. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06226-6

Patriquin, G., LeBlanc, J. J., Williams, C., Hatchette, T. F., Ross, J., Barrett, L., & Davidson, R.. (2022). Comparison between nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection in an asymptomatic population. Microbiology Spectrum, 10(1), Article e0245521. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02455-21

Père, H., Podglajen, I., Wack, M., Flamarion, E., Mirault, T., Goudot, G., Hauw-Berlemont, C., Le, L., Caudron, E., Carrabin, S., Rodary, J., Ribeyre, T., Bélec, L., & Veyer, D. (2020). Nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2: A convenient alternative in times of nasopharyngeal swab shortage. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 58(6). https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00721-20

Ristic, M., Nikolic, N., Cabarkapa, V., Turkulov, V., & Petrovic, V. (2021). Validation of the STANDARD Q COVID-19 antigen test in Vojvodina, Serbia. PLOS ONE, 16(2), Article e0247606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247606

Rothan, H. A., & Byrareddy, S. N. (2020). The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Journal of Autoimmunity, 109, Article 102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433

Safiabadi Tali, S. H., LeBlanc, J. J., Sadiq, Z., Oyewunmi, O. D., Camargo, C., Nikpour, B., Armanfard, N., Sagan, S. M., & Jahanshahi-Anbuhi, S. (2021). Tools and techniques for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 detection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00228-20

Scohy, A., Anantharajah, A., Bodeus, M., Kabamba-Mukadi, B., Verroken, A., & Rodriguez-Villalobos, H. (2020). Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Virology, 129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455

Singh, B., Datta, B., Ashish, A., & Dutta, G. (2021). A comprehensive review on current COVID-19 detection methods. Sensors International, 2, Article 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100119

Sitoe, N., Sambo, J., Mabunda, N., Nguenha, N., Chilaúle, J., Rafael, J., Macicame, A., Chelene, I., Mudenyanga, C., Sacks, J., Viegas, S., Loquiha, O., & Jani, I.. (2022). Clinical performance of self-collected nasal swabs and antigen rapid tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection in resource-poor settings. Biomedicines, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092327

Sule, W. F., & Oluwayelu, D. O. (2020). Real-time RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis: Challenges and prospects. Pan African Medical Journal, 35(Suppl 2), Article 121. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.24258

Valencia, D. N. (2020). Brief review on COVID-19: The 2020 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Cureus, 12(3), Article e7386. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7386

Wölfl-Duchek, M., Bergmann, F., Jorda, A., Weber, M., Müller, M., Seitz, T., Zoufaly, A., Strassl, R., Zeitlinger, M., Herkner, H., Schnidar, H., Anderle, K., & Derhaschnig, U. (2022). Sensitivity and specificity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests using oral, anterior nasal, and nasopharyngeal swabs: A diagnostic accuracy study. Microbiology Spectrum, 10(1), Article e0202921. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02029-21

World Health Organization. (2022). Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) situation report. Geneva: WHO; 2022.

Xu, J., Kerr, L., Jiang, Y., Suo, W., Zhang, L., Lao, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Rapid antigen diagnostics as frontline testing in the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Science, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202200009

Yamayoshi, S., Sakai-Tagawa, Y., Koga, M., Akasaka, O., Nakachi, I., Koh, H., Maeda, K., Adachi, E., Saito, M., Nagai, H., Ikeuchi, K., Ogura, T., Baba, R., Fujita, K., Fukui, T., Ito, F., Hattori, S., Yamamoto, K., Nakamoto, T., … Kawaoka, Y. (2020). Comparison of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19. Viruses, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/v12121420

Younes, N., Al-Sadeq, D. W., Al-Jighefee, H., Younes, S., Al-Jamal, O., Daas, H. I., Yassine, Hadi. M., & Nasrallah, G. K. (2020). Challenges in laboratory diagnosis of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Viruses, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060582

Published
2026-09-16
How to Cite
Hassane, F., Issa, M., Abdoulkader, I. K., Hounkanrin, W., Ousmane, H., Kairo, B. K., Aoula, B., Mamadou, S., Issa, H. H., Issaka, B., Chichi, E. C., Jambou, R., & Lagare, A. (2026). Independent Evaluation of Four SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests Against qRT-PCR in Niger. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 57, 609. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/21533
Section
ESI Preprints