An Investigation of Language Assessment Literacy and Classroom-Based Language Testing Practices among EFL Teachers in Saudi Arabia

  • Rami Mubarak Department of Foreign Languages, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Keywords: Language assessment literacy; classroom-based language testing; applied linguistics; EFL teachers; Saudi Arabia; language measurement

Abstract

Language Assessment Literacy (LAL) refers to teachers' knowledge, skills, and principles of language assessment. It is especially relevant when teachers are responsible for creating and conducting language assessments in the classroom in an EFL setting. The purpose of this study was to explore the link between Language Assessment Literacy and classroom-based language testing practices of EFL teachers in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. The data were collected from 130 EFL teachers of six secondary schools and four universities using a quantitative correlational design. Two questionnaires, developed by the researchers, were used to collect data: the Language Assessment Literacy Questionnaire (25 items) and the Classroom-Based Language Testing Practices Scale (20 items). The results showed that the Language Assessment Literacy (M = 3.62, SD = 0.47) and classroom-based testing practices (M = 3.57, SD = 0.44) were moderate. Assessment validity, ethics, and fairness were the strongest LAL dimensions, with comparatively lower scores for feedback-related score use and for test design and scoring. Pearson correlation analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between LAL and reported classroom-based language testing practices, r(128) = .63, p < .001. The regression model accounted for 39.7% of the variance in reported testing practices. The results indicated that assessment literacy is related to more principled classroom-based language testing practices. Nevertheless, the results of this study are based on self-reported measures and a cross-sectional design; therefore, the results show association and not causation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

References

Almossa, S. Y., & Alzahrani, S. M. (2022). Assessment approaches of English language teachers in the Saudi higher education context. Language Testing in Asia, 12, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00160-x

Bravo, M. M., & Paceño, R. D. (2025). Classroom-based assessment practices and challenges of primary teachers: Basis for a proposed upskilling program. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 6(2), 553–573. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393284359_Classroom-Based_Assessment_Practices_and_Challenges_of_Primary_Teachers_Basis_for_A_Proposed_Upskilling_Program

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041

Gal, C., & Ryder, C. H. (2025). Unlocking potential: Comparing collaborative and traditional learning methods for students with learning disabilities in special education classrooms. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101521

Gareis, C. R., & Grant, L. W. (2015). Assessment Literacy for Teacher Candidates: A Focused Approach. Teacher Educators’ Journal, 2015, 4–21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085699.pdf

Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre‐sessional language courses. Assessment in Education, 14(1), 75–97. https://englishforbeachpurposes.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/green-2013.pdf

Gupta, K. (2023). Validity and reliability of students’ assessment: case for recognition as a unified concept of valid reliability. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 13(3), 129–132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10666833/#sec1

Koloi-Keaikitse, S., & Traynor, A. (2023). Discrepancies between teachers’ self-reported perceived skills and use of classroom assessment practices: The case of Botswana. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2234065. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372291463_Discrepancies_between_teachers’_self-reported_perceived_skills_and_use_of_classroom_assessment_practices_The_case_of_Botswana

Latif, M. W., & Wasim, A. (2024). Investigating EFL instructors' approaches to classroom-based assessment culture: An explanatory sequential mixed-method approach. Language Testing in Asia, 14, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00332-x

Levi, T., & Inbar-Lourie, O. (2020). Assessment literacy or language assessment literacy: Learning from the teachers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1692347

Mahar, H. A., & Khoso, A. R. (2025). VALIDITY IN LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT: ENSURING AUTHENTICITY, FAIRNESS, AND EFFECTIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(4), 959–968. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399140779_VALIDITY_IN_LANGUAGE_ASSESSMENT_ENSURING_AUTHENTICITY_FAIRNESS_AND_EFFECTIVE_LEARNING_OUTCOMES

Phakiti, A., & Steinhoff, A. (2023). Five Golden Rules for Successful Classroom Assessment Based on What We Have Learnt from JD Brown. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 37, 76–90. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1409155.pdf

Prastikawati, E. F., Curle, S., & Vivekanantharasa, R. (2025). Assessment in the crosshairs: How contextual factors shape English teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Proceedings of English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation, 14, 719–730. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398031529_Assessment_in_the_Crosshairs_How_Contextual_Factors_Shape_English_Teachers’_Conceptions_of_Assessment

Shafii, R. A., & Berger, J. L. (2025). Teacher assessment literacy, formative assessment practices, and their perceived efficacy in Tanzania: A scoping review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, 101496. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000537

Sheikh, M. A., Bajwa, F., Aslam, M. J., & Mir, B. (2024). Survey research: Descriptive and analytical power, types and usages. International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), 3(III), 231–239. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385828054_Survey_Research_Descriptive_and_Analytical_Power_Types_and_Usages

Sujianti, N. P. I. P., Sanjiyasa, I. B. M., Mesa, J., Saingo, M., & Bili, P. (2025). EVALUATING LEARNING OUTCOMES STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS IN THE CLASSROOM. International Journal of Education and Social Science Studies, 1(2), 69–76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393590341_EVALUATING_LEARNING_OUTCOMES_STRATEGIES_FOR_ENHANCING_TEACHING_EFFECTIVENESS_IN_THE_CLASSROOM

Tewachew, A. (2025). EFL Teachers’ Conceptions of Designing Classroom-Based Tests. GIST–Education and Learning Research Journal, 30(30). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1479400.pdf

Tsagari, D., & Rousoulioti, T. (2025). Enhancing assessment literacy for teachers of less commonly taught languages: Insights from Greek as a second language. Trends in Higher Education, 4(1), 12. https://www.mdpi.com/2813-4346/4/1/12

Umer, M., Zakaria, M., & Alshara, M. (2018). Investigating Saudi university EFL teachers' assessment literacy: Theory and practice. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n3p345

Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046

Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010

Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
Mubarak, R. (2026). An Investigation of Language Assessment Literacy and Classroom-Based Language Testing Practices among EFL Teachers in Saudi Arabia. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 22(26), 14. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2026.v22n26p14
Section
ESJ Humanities