The Temporal Welfare Trade-off Framework: A Decision-Support Tool for Animal Behavior Modification and Related Welfare-Relevant Procedures

  • Roberto Barata Human-Animal Science, Denmark
Keywords: Animal welfare, harm-benefit analysis, temporal discounting, Five Domains Model, applied ethics, welfare audit, behavior modification

Abstract

Applied ethology and animal training lack a shared analytical procedure for evaluating procedures that impose short-term welfare costs to achieve longer-term welfare or survival outcomes. Existing instruments address parts of the problem, leaving intensity, duration, probability, and temporal discounting uncombined. The Temporal Welfare Trade-off Framework proposed here draws on cumulative welfare assessment in ethology, delay discounting in comparative psychology, and harm-benefit analysis in research ethics. A candidate procedure is expressed as a benefit-cost ratio: the hyperbolically discounted present value of an expected long-term outcome over a cost function combining intensity, duration, frequency, and reversibility. Its equations are a provisional scoring convention adopted for auditability. Since the inputs are ordinal and the combination rules are modeling choices, the output carries no interval or ratio-scale meaning. Three categorical thresholds bound the arithmetic: an intensity ceiling, a reversibility floor, and an alternative-exhaustion requirement, while an epistemic flag records where evidence is too thin for a confident verdict in either direction. The framework evaluates a procedure's welfare structure, setting its methodological label aside. Three worked cases, drawn from conservation translocation, working-dog management and companion-animal husbandry, run the framework on illustrative values throughout. Reliability testing, parameter calibration, and break-even ratio calibration remain outstanding, so the framework currently ranks candidate procedures against one another.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

References

Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge University Press.

Bateson, M. (2016). Cumulative stress in research animals: Telomere attrition as a biomarker in a welfare context? BioEssays, 38(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500127

Bateson, M., & Poirier, C. (2019). Can biomarkers of biological age be used to assess cumulative lifetime experience? Animal Welfare, 28(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.041

Beauchamp, T. L., & DeGrazia, D. (2020). Principles of animal research ethics. Oxford University Press.

Beausoleil, N. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2015). Advantages and limitations of the Five Domains Model for assessing welfare impacts associated with vertebrate pest control. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.956832

Beausoleil, N. J., Mellor, D. J., Baker, L., Baker, S. E., Bellio, M., Clarke, A. S., Dale, A., Garlick, S., Jones, B., Harvey, A., Pitcher, B. J., Sherwen, S., Stockin, K. A., & Zito, S. (2018). "Feelings and fitness" not "feelings or fitness": The raison d'être of conservation welfare, which aligns conservation and animal welfare objectives. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, Article 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00296

Bethell, E. J. (2015). A "how-to" guide for designing judgment bias studies to assess captive animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18(Suppl. 1), S18-S42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2015.1075833

Block, C. H., Siegel, A., & Edinger, H. (1980). Effects of amygdaloid stimulation upon trigeminal sensory fields of the lip that are established during hypothalamically elicited quiet biting attack in the cat. Brain Research, 197(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(80)90433-3

Brønstad, A., Newcomer, C. E., Decelle, T., Everitt, J. I., Guillen, J., & Laber, K. (2016). Current concepts of harm-benefit analysis of animal experiments: Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1. Laboratory Animals, 50(1, Suppl.), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216642398

Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal welfare: Concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science, 69(10), 4167-4175. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69104167x

Broseghini, A., Lõoke, M., Guérineau, C., Marinelli, L., & Mongillo, P. (2024). Ethogram of the predatory sequence of dogs (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 279, Article 106402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106402

Browning, H. (2022). Assessing measures of animal welfare. Biology and Philosophy, 37(4), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09862-1

China, L., Mills, D. S., & Cooper, J. J. (2020). Efficacy of dog training with and without remote electronic collars vs. a focus on positive reinforcement. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, Article 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00508

Christiansen, F. O., Bakken, M., & Braastad, B. O. (2001). Behavioural changes and aversive conditioning in hunting dogs by the second-year confrontation with domestic sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00203-3

Chung, S. H., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1967). Choice and delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67

Cobb, M. L., Iskandarani, K., Chinchilli, V. M., & Dreschel, N. A. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of salivary cortisol measurement in domestic canines. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 57, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.04.003

Cobb, M. L., Jiménez, A. G., & Dreschel, N. A. (2025). Beyond Cortisol! Physiological Indicators of Welfare for Dogs: Deficits, Misunderstandings and Opportunities. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2572616

Cooper, J. J., Cracknell, N., Hardiman, J., Wright, H., & Mills, D. (2014). The welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward-based training. PLOS ONE, 9(9), Article e102722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102722

Coppinger, R., & Coppinger, L. (2001). Dogs: A startling new understanding of canine origin, behavior, and evolution. Scribner.

Dyson, S., Berger, J., Ellis, A. D., & Mullard, J. (2018). Development of an ethogram for a pain scoring system in ridden horses and its application to determine the presence of musculoskeletal pain. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 23, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.10.008

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union, L 276, 33-79.

Farm Animal Welfare Council. (2009). Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present and future. Farm Animal Welfare Council.

Fernandez, E. J. (2024). The least inhibitive, functionally effective (LIFE) model: A new framework for ethical animal training practices. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 71, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2023.12.001

Franklin, T. B. (2019). Recent advancements surrounding the role of the periaqueductal gray in predators and prey. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00060

Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Milligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6(3), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600019795

Friedman, S. G. (2009). What's wrong with this picture? Effectiveness is not enough. Good Bird Magazine, 4(4), 12-18.

Gregg, T. R., & Siegel, A. (2001). Brain structures and neurotransmitters regulating aggression in cats: Implications for human aggression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 25(1), 91-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5846(00)00150-0

Greggor, A. L., Berger-Tal, O., & Blumstein, D. T. (2020). The rules of attraction: The necessary role of animal cognition in explaining conservation failures and successes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 51, 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-103212

Griffin, A. S., Blumstein, D. T., & Evans, C. S. (2000). Training captive-bred or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conservation Biology, 14(5), 1317-1326. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99326.x

Grimm, H., Olsson, I. A. S., & Sandøe, P. (2019). Harm-benefit analysis: What is the added value? A review of alternative strategies for weighing harms and benefits as part of the assessment of animal research. Laboratory Animals, 53(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677218783004

Han, W., Tellez, L. A., Rangel, M. J., Jr., Motta, S. C., Zhang, X., Perez, I. O., Canteras, N. S., Shammah-Lagnado, S. J., van den Pol, A. N., & de Araujo, I. E. (2017). Integrated control of predatory hunting by the central nucleus of the amygdala. Cell, 168(1-2), 311-324.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.027

Honess, P., & Wolfensohn, S. (2010). The extended welfare assessment grid: A matrix for the assessment of welfare and cumulative suffering in experimental animals. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 38(3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291003800304

Huang, M., Li, D., Cheng, X., Pei, Q., Xie, Z., Gu, H., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Liu, A., Wang, Y., Sun, F., Li, Y., Zhang, J., He, M., Xie, Y., Zhang, F., Qi, X., Shang, C., & Cao, P. (2021). The tectonigral pathway regulates appetitive locomotion in predatory hunting in mice. Nature Communications, 12, Article 4409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24696-3

Hunter, T., van Rooy, D., McArthur, M., Bennett, S., Tuke, J., & Hazel, S. (2020). Mental health disease or preventable problem? Australian dog trainers' opinions about canine separation anxiety differ with training style. Animals, 10(8), Article 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081393

Johnson, A. C., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2024). Comparison of the efficacy and welfare of different training methods in stopping chasing behavior in dogs. Animals, 14(18), Article 2632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182632

Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Hintze, S., & Forkman, B. (2021). Towards a positive welfare protocol for cattle: A critical review of indicators and suggestion of how we might proceed. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2, Article 753080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.753080

Krueger, J. C., Boecker, M., Gauggel, S., Bleich, A., & Tolba, R. H. (2023). Using photographs for rating severity degrees of clinical appearance in research mice enables valid discrimination of extreme but not mild and moderate conditions: A pilot study. PLOS ONE, 18(11), Article e0287965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287965

Laber, K., Newcomer, C. E., Decelle, T., Everitt, J. I., Guillen, J., & Brønstad, A. (2016). Recommendations for addressing harm-benefit analysis and implementation in ethical evaluation: Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2. Laboratory Animals, 50(1, Suppl.), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216642397

Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443-478. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155

Leonardi, R. J., Vick, S.-J., & Dufour, V. (2012). Waiting for more: The performance of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on exchange tasks. Animal Cognition, 15(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0437-y

Li, Y., Zeng, J., Zhang, J., Yue, C., Zhong, W., Liu, Z., Feng, Q., & Luo, M. (2018). Hypothalamic circuits for predation and evasion. Neuron, 97(4), 911-924.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.005

Lindsay, S. R. (2005). Handbook of applied dog behavior and training, volume three: Procedures and protocols. Blackwell Publishing.

Marschark, E. D., & Baenninger, R. (2002). Modification of instinctive herding dog behavior using reinforcement and punishment. Anthrozoös, 15(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279302786992685

Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55-73). Erlbaum.

McLean, A. N., & McGreevy, P. D. (2010). Ethical equitation: Capping the price horses pay for human glory. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 5(4), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.003

Mellor, D. J. (2016). Updating animal welfare thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living." Animals, 6(3), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021

Mellor, D. J., Beausoleil, N. J., Littlewood, K. E., McLean, A. N., McGreevy, P. D., Jones, B., & Wilkins, C. (2020). The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals, 10(10), Article 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870

Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., Parker, R. M. A., & Paul, E. S. (2009). Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(3-4), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023

Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., & Paul, E. S. (2010). An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1696), 2895-2904. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0303

Moberg, G. P. (2000). Biological response to stress: Implications for animal welfare. In G. P. Moberg & J. A. Mench (Eds.), The biology of animal stress: Basic principles and implications for animal welfare (pp. 1-21). CABI Publishing.

Moseby, K. E., Cameron, A., & Crisp, H. A. (2012). Can predator avoidance training improve reintroduction outcomes for the greater bilby in arid Australia? Animal Behaviour, 83(4), 1011-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.023

Nelson, R. J., & Trainor, B. C. (2007). Neural mechanisms of aggression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 536-546. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2174

Paul, E. S., Sher, S., Tamietto, M., Winkielman, P., & Mendl, M. T. (2020). Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 749-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.014

Quirk, G. J., & Mueller, D. (2008). Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301555

Rodríguez, W., Bouzas, A., & Orduña, V. (2018). Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats. Learning and Behavior, 46(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-017-0279-9

Rossier, D., La Franca, V., Salemi, T., Natale, S., & Gross, C. T. (2021). A neural circuit for competing approach and defense underlying prey capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), Article e2013411118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013411118

Salgirli, Y., Schalke, E., Boehm, I., & Hackbarth, H. (2012). Comparison of learning effects and stress between 3 different training methods (electronic training collar, pinch collar and quitting signal) in Belgian Malinois police dogs. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire, 163(11), 530-535.

Sargisson, R. J., & McLean, I. G. (2021). Commentary: Efficacy of dog training with and without remote electronic collars vs. a focus on positive reinforcement. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, Article 629746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.629746

Schuck-Paim, C., & Alonso, W. J. (2025). Welfare Footprint Framework: Methodological foundations and quantitative assessment guidelines. OSF. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/94bxs

Shang, C., Liu, A., Li, D., Xie, Z., Chen, Z., Huang, M., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Shen, W. L., & Cao, P. (2019). A subcortical excitatory circuit for sensory-triggered predatory hunting in mice. Nature Neuroscience, 22(6), 909-920. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0405-4

Shier, D. M., & Owings, D. H. (2006). Effects of predator training on behavior and post-release survival of captive prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Biological Conservation, 132(1), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.020

Tetzlaff, S. J., Sperry, J. H., & DeGregorio, B. A. (2019). Effects of antipredator training, environmental enrichment, and soft release on wildlife translocations: A review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 236, 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.054

Vanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L., & Green, L. (2016). Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human - Does it matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000097

Vieira de Castro, A. C., Fuchs, D., Morello, G. M., Pastur, S., de Sousa, L., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2020). Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare. PLOS ONE, 15(12), Article e0225023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225023

Wang, W., Zhong, Y., Tan, R., Wang, M., Liu, J., Wang, D., Wang, H., Li, Y., Li, G., Yang, J., Wang, P., Wu, J., Zhang, J.-X., Wang, C.-Z., Shi, H., Ma, M., Yu, Y., & Zhang, Y.-F. (2025). A midbrain-to-ventral-striatum dopaminergic pathway orchestrates odor-guided insect predation in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(41), Article e2514847122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2514847122

Weary, D. M., & Robbins, J. A. (2019). Understanding the multiple conceptions of animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 28(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.033

West, R., Letnic, M., Blumstein, D. T., & Moseby, K. E. (2018). Predator exposure improves anti-predator responses in a threatened mammal. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12947

Wolfensohn, S., Sharpe, S., Hall, I., Lawrence, S., Kitchen, S., & Dennis, M. (2015). Refinement of welfare through development of a quantitative system for assessment of lifetime experience. Animal Welfare, 24(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.2.139

Würbel, H. (2017). More than 3Rs: The importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research. Lab Animal, 46(4), 164-166. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1220

Yeates, J. W. (2011). Is "a life worth living" a concept worth having? Animal Welfare, 20(3), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600002955

Yeates, J. W. (2012). Quality time: Temporal and other aspects of ethical principles based on a "life worth living." Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(4), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9317-3

Yi, R., Gatchalian, K. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2006). Discounting of past outcomes. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 14(3), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.311

Yu, H., Xiang, X., Chen, Z., Wang, X., Dai, J., Wang, X., Huang, P., Zhao, Z.-D., Shen, W. L., & Li, H. (2021). Periaqueductal gray neurons encode the sequential motor program in hunting behavior of mice. Nature Communications, 12, Article 6523. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26852-1

Zhao, Z.-D., Chen, Z., Xiang, X., Hu, M., Xie, H., Jia, X., Cai, F., Cui, Y., Chen, Z., Qian, L., Liu, J., Shang, C., Yang, Y., Ni, X., Sun, W., Hu, J., Cao, P., Li, H., & Shen, W. L. (2019). Zona incerta GABAergic neurons integrate prey-related sensory signals and induce an appetitive drive to promote hunting. Nature Neuroscience, 22(6), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0404-5

Zhao, Z.-D., Zhang, L., Xiang, X., Kim, D., Li, H., Cao, P., & Shen, W. L. (2023). Neurocircuitry of predatory hunting. Neuroscience Bulletin, 39(5), 817-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-01018-1

Ziv, G. (2017). The effects of using aversive training methods in dogs: A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 19, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.02.004

Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
Barata, R. (2026). The Temporal Welfare Trade-off Framework: A Decision-Support Tool for Animal Behavior Modification and Related Welfare-Relevant Procedures. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 22(27), 1. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2026.v22n27p1
Section
ESJ Natural/Life/Medical Sciences