Women's Labour In Turkey: A Comparasıon Wıth Selected Oecd Countrıes 49

  • Ebubekir Karacayir Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Economy Department, Turkey
  • Sinem Yapar Sacik Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Economy Department, Turkey

Abstract

Gender inequality that exists in every area of a society is experienced at an intense level in employment area in Turkey. This inequality, though has been decreasing, goes on in every aspect of employment such as female labor force participation rate, unemployment rate, underemployment rate, informal employment, salaries etc., and slows down the process of enhancement of women’s position in the society. Evaluating Turkey with regards to the United Nations Millennium Development Goals 2015, it is clearly observed that no significant progress could be achieved in reduction of social gender inequality. One of the important goals in the development process in the world is to enhance welfare in countries by increasing woman employment. As a consequence of expansion in services sectors in the last two decades, female labor force participation has approached to but it is still lower than that of males labor force. It is of necessity to present women’s labour through a comparison of data from various countries in order to shed light to the problem of gender-based inequality women live through in Turkey. Therefore, in this study, women’s labour has been evaluated through a comparative analysis of Turkey and preselected OECD countries. The findings of the study have reached several different features of Turkey and have defined similarities between Turkey and these countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

Published
2016-03-30
How to Cite
Karacayir, E., & Sacik, S. Y. (2016). Women’s Labour In Turkey: A Comparasıon Wıth Selected Oecd Countrıes 49. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(8), 142. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n8p142