Exploring the Lived Experiences of Inclusive Education Teachers Handling Students With Intellectual Disability: A Mixed Method Approach

  • Soren R. Sanchez University of Cebu – Main Campus, Philippines
  • Liza Chua University of Cebu – Main Campus, Philippines
  • Rogaciano B. Melgar University of Cebu – Main Campus, Philippines
Keywords: Inclusive education, lived experiences, stressors, coping mechanisms, fulfilling experiences and opportunities

Abstract

This paper focuses on exploring the lived experiences of inclusive education teachers handling students with intellectual disability in terms of their stressors, coping mechanisms, fulfilling experiences, and opportunities. A mixed method using questionnaire and one-on-one interview were employed in gathering the needed quantitative and qualitative data from the 13 purposively chosen respondents. Frequency and simple weighted mean were used in interpreting the quantitative data, while the Groenewald’s process of phenomenological analysis was employed to extract themes from the qualitative data. Results revealed that the students’ behavioral issues were the only potential stressors of the inclusive teachers. They coped via using cognitive, social, and physical coping resources. Students’ positive transformations, understanding the child through team teaching, and road to salary augmentation were the themes generated as their fulfilling experiences and opportunities. It is recommended that schools offering inclusive education should equip their teachers with pedagogical knowledge in handling the behavioral issues of students with special needs through providing relevant trainings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
Sanchez, S. R., Chua, L., & Melgar, R. B. (2021). Exploring the Lived Experiences of Inclusive Education Teachers Handling Students With Intellectual Disability: A Mixed Method Approach. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 17(12), 90. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n12p90
Section
ESJ Social Sciences