Is Narayan’s Bharati a Crocus of an Ideal Indian Woman?

  • Reshma Tabassum Assistant Professor, Department of English PGDAV College, Delhi University, New Delhi, India
Keywords: Complex Identity, Emancipation, Ideal, Assertion, Morality

Abstract

India is a land with deep-rooted value system. Exhibiting the trends associated with being a ‘true Indian’, R.K. Narayan, who is celebrated as a pure and simple writer, affirms the values of life and reposes faith in moral order in his novels. At the time when he started writing, Indian society underwent a sea change. Social reformers and intellectuals were busy in redefining the image of an Indian woman. Narayan also felt the pressure of the prevalent ideology and put forward the idea of what it is to be an ideal Indian woman and created a female character named Bharati in his novel Waiting for the Mahatma (1955). The novel is seen as a ‘liberation fable’ with Bharati as the central character who is viewed as a crocus of an ideal Indian woman. Her view of life is considered viable and authentic. Critics opine that Bharati, who is bold, self-dependent, and strong is an example of Narayan’s true vision of women’s empowerment. Although when her character is studied closely, it becomes apparent that Bharati internalizes myths and accepts roles that afford her no real choices and no real values. She perfectly resembles traditional women who possess neither agency nor any will of their own and spend their energy in the service of patriarchy. Even though Bharati radiates through the novel and finds a space, her attributes as a volitional force reserved for Sriram suggest that she is the subject of the novel who lacks artistic expression and self-assertion. Narayan, despite his awareness about the predicament of an Indian woman and his sincere effort to be judicious towards woman, fails to transcend the forces of history that allows him to look at women with stereotypical vision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Batliwala, S. (1996). ‘The Meaning of Women’s Empowerment: New Conceps from Action’, in G. Sen, A. Germain and L.C.Chen (eds), Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights, Harvard Centre for Population and Development Studies, Boston, MA.
2. Batliwala, S. (1993). Empowerment of Women in South Asia: Concepts and Practices, Asian-South Pacific Bureau of Adult Education, Mumbai.
3. Beauvoir, Simone de. (1952). The Second Sex. trans. H.M. Parshley, New York: Vintage.
4. Ellmann, M. (1968). Thinking about Women, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, p. 93-94.
5. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. Sheridan, Vintage Books, New York, p.200-1.
6. Ghadially, R. ed. (1988). Women in Indian Society: A Reader, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
7. Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex which is not One, translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke, Cornell University Press, New York, p. 81.
8. Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex which is not One, translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke, Cornell University Press, New York, p. 25.
9. Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex which is not One, translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke, Cornell University Press, New York, p. 25.
10. Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought, Verso, London.
11. Kumar, S. P. (ed). (2015). Cultural Diversity Linguistic plurality and Literary Traditions in India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, p.60.
12. Malgudi Women (1984). Triveni, July-September, p. 41.
13. Miller, J. A. (1987).‘Jeremy Bentham’s Panoptic Device’, trans. Richard Miller, October, 41 (Summer).
14. Moore, M. (2001). ‘Empowerment at Last? Journal of International Development, Vol.13, No.3, p. 321-9.
15. Narayan, R.K. (2001). My Days: A Memoir, London: Picador, p. 119.
16. Narayan, R.K. (2001). My Days: A Memoir. London: Picador, p. 119.
17. Rao, R. (2003). Kanthapura, Orient Paperbacks, Delhi, p.369.
18. Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras, Oxfam Publishing, Oxford.
19. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, Penguin Books, London, p.20.
20. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, Penguin Books, London, p.23.
21. Vivekananda, S. (1900). Women of India, Madras: Ramakrishna Math, p. 10.
22. Waiting for the Mahatma (2003). Chennai: Sudarsan Graphics.
23. Wollstonecraft, M. (1983). A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Excerpted in Women, the Family, and Freedom: The Debate in Documents, VOL- I: 1750-1880, eds. Susan Groag Bell and Karen M.Offen. Stanford University Press.
24. Woolf, V. A. (2016). Room of One’s Own, Fingerprint Classics, New Delhi, p.41.
25. Woolf, V. A. (2016). Room of One’s Own, Fingerprint Classics, New Delhi, p.54.
26. Woolf, V. A. (2016). Room of One’s Own, Fingerprint Classics, New Delhi, p. 88.
Published
2022-08-31
How to Cite
Tabassum, R. (2022). Is Narayan’s Bharati a Crocus of an Ideal Indian Woman?. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 18(26), 34. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n26p34
Section
ESJ Humanities