Institutionalising Urban Climate Action: Recent Recognitions
Abstract
With in-depth knowledge of the urban climate governance literature, studies of this nature have yet to be fully explored in the context of institutionalisation. Knowing which aspects are well-researched and where in contrast, research gaps lie, this paper systematically reviews the relevant literature to understand how urban climate governance has been institutionalised in cities and municipalities by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and analysing English language journal articles published between 1990 and 2020 in the Web of Science database. As the concept of institutions is becoming more prominent in urban climate change literature, the findings indicate that urban adaptation was mentioned more frequently than mitigation, among other topics. Moreover, the research gaps encompass several institutional challenges associated with urban climate governance. Therefore, one essential step is to focus on new institutional arrangements for advancing climate goals across multiple localities.
Downloads
Metrics
PlumX Statistics
References
2. Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017
3. Aylett, A. (2013). The Socio-institutional Dynamics of Urban Climate Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Innovation and Change in Durban (KZN, South Africa) and Portland (OR, USA). Urban Studies, 50(7), 1386–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013480968
4. Aylett, A. (2015). Institutionalizing the urban governance of climate change adaptation: Results of an international survey. Urban Climate, 14, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.005
5. Berrang-Ford, L., Pearce, T., & Ford, J. D. (2015). Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research. Regional Environmental Change, 15(5), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0708-7
6. Bettini, Y., Brown, R., & de Haan, F. J. (2013). Water scarcity and institutional change: Lessons in adaptive governance from the drought experience of Perth, Western Australia. Water Science and Technology, 67(10), 2160–2168. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.127
7. Bettini, Y., Brown, R. R., & de Haan, F. J. (2015). Exploring institutional adaptive capacity in practice: Examining water governance adaptation in Australia. Ecology and Society, 20(1), art47. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07291-200147
8. Brown, R. R., & Farrelly, M. A. (2009). Challenges ahead: Social and institutional factors influencing sustainable urban stormwater management in Australia. Water Science and Technology, 59(4), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.022
9. Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747
10. Burch, S. (2010). Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
11. Câmpeanu, C. N., & Fazey, I. (2014). Adaptation and pathways of change and response: A case study from Eastern Europe. Global Environmental Change, 28, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.010
12. Carter, J. G., Cavan, G., Connelly, A., Guy, S., Handley, J., & Kazmierczak, A. (2015). Climate change and the city: Building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in Planning, 95, 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
13. Castán Broto, V., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
14. Cousins, J. J. (2017). Infrastructure and institutions: Stakeholder perspectives of stormwater governance in Chicago. Cities, 66, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.005
15. Francesch-Huidobro, M. (2012). Institutional deficit and lack of legitimacy: The challenges of climate change governance in Hong Kong. Environmental Politics, 21(5), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.686221
16. Frick-Trzebitzky, F. (2017). Crafting Adaptive Capacity: Institutional Bricolage in Adaptation to Urban Flooding in Greater Accra. 10(2), 23.
17. Fünfgeld, H. (2010). Institutional challenges to climate risk management in cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.07.001
18. Göpfert, C., Wamsler, C., & Lang, W. (2019a). A framework for the joint institutionalization of climate change mitigation and adaptation in city administrations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9789-9
19. Göpfert, C., Wamsler, C., & Lang, W. (2019b). Institutionalising climate change mitigation and adaptation through city advisory committees: Lessons learned and policy futures. City and Environment Interactions, 1, 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2019.100004
20. Guyadeen, D., Thistlethwaite, J., & Henstra, D. (2019a). Evaluating the quality of municipal climate change plans in Canada. Climatic Change, 152(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2312-1
21. Guyadeen, D., Thistlethwaite, J., & Henstra, D. (2019b). Evaluating the quality of municipal climate change plans in Canada. Climatic Change, 152(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2312-1
22. Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., & Loorbach, D. (2019). Capacities for urban transformations governance and the case of New York City. Cities, 94, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.037
23. Horne, R., & Moloney, S. (2019). Urban low carbon transitions: Institution-building and prospects for interventions in social practice. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1472745
24. Hovik, S., Naustdalslid, J., Reitan, M., & Muthanna, T. (2015). Adaptation to Climate Change: Professional Networks and Reinforcing Institutional Environments. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1230h
25. Huck, A., Monstadt, J., & Driessen, P. (2020). Building urban and infrastructure resilience through connectivity: An institutional perspective on disaster risk management in Christchurch, New Zealand. Cities, 98, 102573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102573
26. Hughes, S., & Romero-Lankao, P. (2014). Science and institution building in urban climate-change policymaking. Environmental Politics, 23(6), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.921459
27. Hunter, N., North, M., Roberts, D., & Slotow, R. (2020). A systematic map of responses to climate impacts in urban Africa. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 103005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9d00
28. Lassa, J. A. (2019). Negotiating Institutional Pathways for Sustaining Climate Change Resilience and Risk Governance in Indonesia. Climate, 7(8), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7080095
29. López-Martínez, F., Pérez-Morales, A., & Illán-Fernández, E. J. (2020). Are local administrations really in charge of flood risk management governance? The Spanish Mediterranean coastline and its institutional vulnerability issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1577551
30. Marsden, G., & Groer, S. (2016). Do institutional structures matter? A comparative analysis of urban carbon management policies in the UK and Germany. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.002
31. Monstadt, J. (2007). Urban Governance and the Transition of Energy Systems: Institutional Change and Shifting Energy and Climate Policies in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00725.x
32. Munaretto, S., Vellinga, P., & Tobi, H. (2012). Flood Protection in Venice under Conditions of Sea-Level Rise: An Analysis of Institutional and Technical Measures. Coastal Management, 40(4), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2012.692311
33. Olazabal, M., & Ruiz De Gopegui, M. (2021). Adaptation planning in large cities is unlikely to be effective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 206, 103974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103974
34. Olazabal, M., Ruiz de Gopegui, M., Tompkins, E. L., Venner, K., & Smith, R. (2019). A cross-scale worldwide analysis of coastal adaptation planning. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5532
35. Pasquini, L. (n.d.). Municipalities, politics, and climate change: An example of the process of institutionalizing an environmental agenda within local government. 29.
36. Pasquini, L., & Shearing, C. (2014). Municipalities, Politics, and Climate Change: An Example of the Process of Institutionalizing an Environmental Agenda Within Local Government. The Journal of Environment & Development, 23(2), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496514525406
37. Patterson, J. J. (2021). More than planning: Diversity and drivers of institutional adaptation under climate change in 96 major cities. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102279
38. Patterson, J. J., & Huitema, D. (2019). Institutional innovation in urban governance: The case of climate change adaptation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(3), 374–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1510767
39. Patterson, J., Voogt, D. L., & Sapiains, R. (2019). Beyond inputs and outputs: Process‐oriented explanation of institutional change in climate adaptation governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(5), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1865
40. Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., De Gregorio-Hurtado, S., D’Alonzo, V., Foley, A., Simoes, S. G., Krkoška Lorencová, E., Orru, H., Orru, K., Wejs, A., Flacke, J., Olazabal, M., Geneletti, D., Feliu, E., Vasilie, S., Nador, C., … Dawson, R. (2018a). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
41. Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., De Gregorio-Hurtado, S., D’Alonzo, V., Foley, A., Simoes, S. G., Krkoška Lorencová, E., Orru, H., Orru, K., Wejs, A., Flacke, J., Olazabal, M., Geneletti, D., Feliu, E., Vasilie, S., Nador, C., … Dawson, R. (2018b). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
42. Roelich, K., Bale, C. S. E., Turner, B., & Neall, R. (2018). Institutional pathways to municipal energy companies in the UK: Realising co-benefits to mitigate climate change in cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.002
43. Roggero, M. (2015). Adapting institutions: Exploring climate adaptation through institutional economics and set relations. Ecological Economics, 118, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.022
44. Roggero, M., Bisaro, A., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2018). Institutions in the climate adaptation literature: A systematic literature review through the lens of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(3), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000376
45. Romero-Lankao, P., Hughes, S., Rosas-Huerta, A., Borquez, R., & Gnatz, D. M. (2013). Institutional Capacity for Climate Change Responses: An Examination of Construction and Pathways in Mexico City and Santiago. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12173
46. Taylor, A. (2016). Institutional inertia in a changing climate: Climate adaptation planning in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2014-0033
47. Tennekes, J., Driessen, P. P. J., van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & van Bree, L. (2014). Out of the Comfort Zone: Institutional Context and the Scope for Legitimate Climate Adaptation Policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.836961
48. Tingey, M., & Webb, J. (2020). Governance institutions and prospects for local energy innovation: Laggards and leaders among UK local authorities. Energy Policy, 138, 111211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111211
49. van der Heijden, J. (2019). Studying urban climate governance: Where to begin, what to look for, and how to make a meaningful contribution to scholarship and practice. Earth System Governance, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005
50. Wamsler, C., & Lawson, N. (2012). Complementing institutional with localised strategies for climate change adaptation: A South-North comparison. Disasters, 36(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01248.x
51. Wei, Q. (2021). Do urban carbon reduction practices under China’s institutional arrangement go beyond “low-hanging fruits”? Empirical evidence from Guangzhou. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(6), 978–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1796606
52. Wejs, A. (2014). Integrating Climate Change into Governance at the Municipal Scale: An Institutional Perspective on Practices in Denmark. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(6), 1017–1035. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1215
53. Zaidi, R. Z., & Pelling, M. (2015). Institutionally configured risk: Assessing urban resilience and disaster risk reduction to heat wave risk in London. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1218–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013510957
Copyright (c) 2023 Ama Kissiwah Boateng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.